- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:19
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:6
|
|
|
2021, vol. 93, br. 2, str. 479-493
|
|
Zaštita poverljive komunikacije između advokata i klijenta u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava
The protection of confidential communication between a lawyer and a client in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights
Sažetak
Poverljivost komunikacije predstavlja jedno veoma važno ljudsko pravo koje svoj još veći značaj dobija kada se komunikacija vrši između advokata i klijenta. Naime, da bi advokat mogao adekvatno da zastupa svog klijenta potrebno je da klijent bude siguran da informacije koje poveri advokatu neće doći do trećih lica, odnosno da će komunikacija ostati poverljiva. U tom smislu zaštita poverljivosti komunikacije između advokata i klijenta veoma je važna ne samo za zastupanje klijenta u svakom pojedinačnom slučaju, nego i za pravilno funkcionisanje pravnog sistema jedne države. Cilj ovoga rada je da se ustanovi kojim članovima Evropske konvencije se štiti pravo na poverljivu komunikaciju advokata i klijenta, odnosno na koji način se ova komunikacija štiti u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. Takođe, u radu je posebno razmatrano da li je moguće propisati meru kojom bi se jedno tako važno pravo kao što je pravo na privilegovanu i poverljivu komunikaciju između advokata i klijenta moglo ograničiti i, ako bi moglo, pod kojim uslovima.
Abstract
Confidentiality of communication is a very important human right that gains in importance when the communication is conducted between a lawyer and a client. Namely, for a lawyer to be able to adequately represent their client, the client must be sure that the information they entrust to the lawyer will not reach third parties, i.e. that the communication will remain confidential. In this sense, protecting the confidentiality of communication between a lawyer and a client is very important not only for representing the client in each case, but also for the proper functioning of the legal system. This paper aims to establish which articles of the European Convention protect the right to a confidential communication between a lawyer and a client and how this communication is protected in practice by the European Court of Human Rights. The paper also examines whether it is possible to prescribe a measure by which such an important right as the right to privileged and confidential communication between a lawyer and a client could be limited and if so under what conditions.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
|
*** (1945) Statute of the International Court of Justice, adopted together with UN Charter in San Francisco on June 26, 1945. Official Gazette of the DFY, no. 69/45
|
|
|
Björgvinsson, D.T. (2011) Lawyer-Client confidentiality. u: Case law of the ECHR, Madrid: FBE
|
|
|
CCBE (2016) Recommendations on the protection of client confidentiality within the context of surveillance activities. retrieved on 5. 9. 2020. Available at: http://uploads.ordineavvocatimessina.it/downloads/en-ccbe-recommendati1-1463743795.pdf
|
|
|
Council Of Europe (1950) European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Rome, Protocols Nos. 11 and 14
|
|
|
Cozzi, A., Sykiotou, A., Rajska, D., Krstić, I., Filatova, M., Katić, N., Bourgeois, S. (2016) Uporedni prikaz primene Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima na nacionalnom nivou. Belgrade: Council of Europe
|
|
2
|
Etinski, R., Đajić, S. (2012) Međunarodno javno pravo. Novi Sad: Futura (Faculty of Law in Novi Sad), 5th amended and enhanced edition
|
|
|
Gerven, D.V. (2013) Professional Secrecy of Lawyers in Europe. u: Professional Secrecy of Lawyers in Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Chapter I
|
|
|
Kilkelly, U. (2003) The right to respect for private and family life: A guide to the implementation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. retrieved on 31. 8. 2020. Available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/49f17e212.html
|
|
|
Korff, D. (2008) The Standard Approach under Articles 8-11 ECHR and Article 2 ECHR. London: London Metropolitan University
|
|
10
|
Krstić, I., Marinković, T. (2016) Evropsko pravo ljudskih prava. Belgrade: Council of Europe
|
|
4  
|
Letsas, G. (2010) Strasbourg's Interpretive Ethic: Lessons for the International Lawyer. European Journal of International Law, 21(3): 509-541
|
|
|
Mole, N., Harby, C. (2006) The right to a fair trial: A guide to the implementation of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. retrived on 31. 8. 2020. Available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/49f180362.html
|
|
1
|
Omejec, J. (2013) Konvencija za zaštitu ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda u praksi Europskog suda za ljudska prava. Zagreb: Novi informator
|
|
|
Spronken, T., Fermon, J. (2008) Protection of Attorney-Client Privilege in Europe. Penn State International Law Review, 27 (2), Article 9, 439-440
|
|
1
|
Šarin, D. (2015) Pravo na pristup sudu u praksi Europskog suda za ljudska prava. Pravni vjesnik: Journal of Law and Social Sciences of the Facuty of Law Josip Juraj Strossmayer, University of Osijek, 31 (3-4), 267-296
|
|
8
|
van Dijk, P., van Hoof, G.J.H. (1998) Theory and practice of the European Convention on Human Rights. Den Haag: Kluwer Law International, 3rd Edition
|
|
|
White, R.C.A., Ovey, C. (2010) The European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University press, fifth edition, 325-326
|
|
|
|
|