2015, vol. 53, br. 4-6, str. 13-33
|
|
Privreda i novi Građanski zakonik Srbije
Economy and new Serbian Civil Code
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet, Srbija + Spoljnotrgovinska arbitraža pri Privrednoj komori Srbije
Sažetak
U ovom članku autor kritički analizira rešenja Nacrta Građanskog zakonika Srbije (GZS), kako u odnosu na postojeći Zakon o obligacionim odnosima (ZOO), tako i u odnosu na domete relevantne istovetne regulative u nekim referentnim zemljama, odnosno u međunarodnim ili regionalnim propisima. Kako odgovori na ova pitanja zahtevaju prethodni odgovor na pitanje opravdanosti svojevrsnog pokreta kodifikacije, kao i odgovor na pitanje dometa i značaja prvog građanskog zakonika moderne Srbije (1844), to autor najpre raspravlja ova pitanja i zauzima u osnovi pozitivan stav. Takođe, autor traži odgovor na pitanje da li je novi Građanski zakonik Srbije - potreba i/ili nužnost i odgovara potvrdno: i potreba i nužnost. Slede zatim kritička razmatranja: osnovnih postavki Nacrta GZS, postavki regulative ugovora u privredi - opšti i posebni deo, postavki regulative bankarskih poslova i postavki regulative hartija od vrednosti. Dajući u osnovi pozitivan sud o Nacrtu GZS, autor ipak kritikuje sam njegov prilaz regulativi bankarskih poslova i regulativi hartija od vrednosti, zalažući se za još restriktivniji pristup kod bankarskih poslova (posebno zbog čestih promena i primata autonomne međunarodne regulative) i koherentniji prilaz sistemu hartija od vrednosti (imajući u vidu takođe činjenicu da i ovde postoje brojni drugi domaći i međunarodni izvori).
Abstract
In this article the author critically analyzes the solutions of draft Serbian Civil code (SCC), in relation to existing Law on Contracts and Torts as well as in comparison to ranges of relevant identical regulations in certain reference countries, which is, in international or regional regulations. Since answers to these questions request previous answer to question of validity of certain codification movement, as well as answer to the question of range and importance of the first Civil code of modern Serbia (1844), the author firstly argues these questions and basically takes a positive stand. Also, the author seeks for answer to the question if the new Serbian Civil code is a need and/or necessity and answers positively: both, the need and the necessity. Further on, critical observations are made of basic postulates of Draft SCC, postulates of commercial contracts regulations - general and special part, postulates of banking contracts regulations and postulates of securities regulations. Giving basically positive judgment of Draft SCC, the author nevertheless criticizes its approach to the banking contracts regulations and securities regulations, advocating even more restrictive approach in banking contracts (especially because of frequent changes and the primary role of autonomous international regulations and more coherent approach to securities system (bearing in mind the fact that numerous other domestic and international sources exist also here).
|