Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:8
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:6

Sadržaj

članak: 1 od 39  
Back povratak na rezultate
Revija Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava
2021, vol. 3, br. 2, str. 25-58
Cilj privrednog društva sa osvrtom na aktuelnu pandemiju
Radović Vuk
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet, Srbija + LL.M. University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America

e-adresa: vuk@ius.bg.ac.rs
Projekat:
Rad se objavljuje u okviru projekta Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu pod nazivom "Epidemija. Pravo. Društvo" za 2021. godinu

Ključne reči: akcionar; stejkholder; akcionarsko društvo; COVID-19; Berle-Dodd debata; Fridmanova doktrina
Sažetak
Imaju li privredna društva jasno određen cilj? Da li je taj cilj jedinstven za sva privredna društva? Može li privredno društvo da formuliše svoj cilj i da postupa u skladu sa njim? Da li je ovo oblast u kojoj zakonodavac treba da interveniše, do koje mere i na koji način? Kakvu ulogu treba i može da ima samo privredno društvo prilikom određivanja sopstvenog cilja? Ovo su sámo neka od pitanja na koja autor u ovom radu pokušava da dâ odgovor, imajući u vidu brojne teorijske rasprave, kao i uporedna i domaća zakonodavna rešenja. Dilema između primene akcionarske teorije i multiinteresne (stejkholderske) teorije predstavlja jednu od najvećih kontroverzi savremenog kompanijskog prava. Aktuelna pandemija je samo dodatno apostrofirala osnovne probleme ovih teorija. Imajući u vidu da se konačni odgovori u ovoj oblasti ne mogu dati, autor sagledava domaća rešenja, kako bi dao preporuke za njihovo tumačenje.
Reference

Bainbridge, S.M. (1992) Interpreting Nonshareholder Constituency Statutes. Pepperdine Law Review, 19(3)

Berle, A. (1931) Corporate Powers as Powers in Trust. Harvard Law Journal, 44

Berle, J.A.A. (1954) The 20th Century Capitalist Revolution. New York

Berle, J.A.A., Means, G. (1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property

Cheffins, B.R. (2019) The Public Company Transformed. New York: Oxford University Press

Cheffins, B.R. (2020) Stop Blaming Milton Friedman!. European Corporate Governance Institute - Law Working Paper, 523/2020, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3552950, March 11

Chohan, A. (2012) Is Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 Capable of Delivering for All Stakeholders?. August 31, 2012, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2139528

Conac, P.-.H. (2019) The reform of articles 1833 on social interest and 1835 on the purpose of the company of the French Civil Code: recognition or revolution?. u: Festschrift fűr Karsten Schmidt zum 80. Geburtstag, C.H.Beck, Band I

Davies, P. (2010) Introduction to Company Law. Oxford, 2nd edition

6

Davies, P.L. (2008) Gower and Davies' Principles of Modern Company Law. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 8. ed

Dodd, J.E.M. (1932) For Whom are Corporate Managers Trustees?. Harvard Law Review, 45

3

Easterbrook, F.H., Fischel, D.R. (1996) The Economic Structure of Corporate Law. Harvard University Press

Ferrarini, G. (2020) Corporate Purpose and Sustainability. European Corporate Governance Institute - Law Working Paper, December 7, 559/2020, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3753594

Ferrarini, G., Zhu, S. (2021) Is There a Role for Benefit Corporations in the New Sustainable Governance Framework?. European Corporate Governance Institute - Law Working Paper, May 30, 588/2021, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3869696

Fleischer, H. (2018) Unternehmensinteresse und intérêt social: Schlűsselfiguren aktienrechtlichen Denkens in Deutschland und Frankreich. Zeitschrift für Unternehmensund Gesellschaftsrecht, 5

Fleischer, H. (2021) Corporate Purpose: A Management Concept and its Implications for Company Law. European Company and Financial Law Review, 2

Fleischer, J.A., Sussman, A.R. (2000) Takeover Defense. Aspen Law & Business

Forsinger, C.M. (2002) Takeover Law in the EU and the USA - A Comparative Analysis. Hag: Kluwer Law International

Friedman, M. (2002) Capitalism and Freedom. 40. ed, 1962

1

Friedman, M. (1970) The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. New York Times Sunday Magazine, 13.9.1970

Hansen, C. (1991) Other Constituency Statutes: A Search for Perspective. Business Lawyer, 46(4)

Hansmann, H., Kraakman, R.H. (2000) The End of History for Corporate Law. January 2000, dostupno na: https://ssrn.com/abstract=204528

Hart, O., Zingales, L. (2017) Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value. Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting, 2

Hazen, T.L. (2002) The Law of Securities Regulation. St. Paul, MN: West Group

Hazen, T.L., Ratner, D.L. (2003) Securities Regulation - Cases and Materials. St. Paul, MN: Thomson West

Hill, J.G. (2010) Then and Now: Professor Berle and the Unpredictable Shareholder. Seattle University Law Review, 33(4)

Holmstrom, B., Kaplan, S.N. (2003) The State of U.S. Corporate Governance: What's Right and What's Wrong?. Finance Working Paper, 23/2003, ssrn.com

Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.H. (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Ecnomics, 3

3

Jovanović, N., Radović, V., Radović, M. (2021) Kompanijsko pravo - pravo privrednih subjekata. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, 2. izdanje

Keay, A.R. (2010) Moving Towards Stakeholderism? Constituency Statutes, Enlightened Shareholder Value and All That: Much Ado About Little?. January 4, 2010, dostupno na: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1530990

Kershaw, D., Schuster, E.-.P. (2019) The Purposive Transformation of Company Law. LSE Legal Studies Working Paper, March 31, 4/2019, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3363267

3

Koevski, G. (2005) Komparativno korporativno upravuvanje. Skopje

3

Lepetić, J. (2015) Kompanijskopravni režim sukoba interesa - Dužnost lojalnosti. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu

Lipton, M. (2017) Corporate Governance: The New Paradigm. https://corpgov.law.harvard. edu/2017/01/11/corporate-governance-the-new-paradigm

Mayer, C. (2018) Prosperity: Better Business Makes the Greater Good. Oxford

Mayer, C. (2021) The Governance of Corporate Purpose. European Corporate Governance Institute - Law Working Paper, May 12, 609/2021, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3928613

1

Mihajlović, B. (2017) Cilj poslovanja privrednog društva - samo sticanje dobiti ili još nešto?. Pravo i privreda, vol. 55, br. 4-6, str. 140-157

1

Radović, V. (2008) Uticaj agencijskih problema na pravo akcionarskih društava i korporativno upravljanje. u: Vasiljević Mirko;Radović Vuk [ur.] Korporativno upravljanje - zbornik radova, Beograd

1

Radović, V. (2020) Nevoljni prestanak privrednog društva zbog blokade i ugnjetavanja manjine. Revija Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava, vol. 2, br. 1, str. 101-120

Rock, E.B. (2020) For Whom is the Corporation Managed in 2020?: The Debate over Corporate Purpose. European Corporate Governance Institute - Law Working Paper, May 1, 515/2020, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 20-16, NYU Law and Economics Research Paper, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3589951

Roe, M.J. (2001) The Shareholder Wealth Maximization Norm and Industrial Organization. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 149

Romano, R. (1987) The Political Economy of Takeover Statutes. Virginia Law Review, 73

Romano, R. (1984) Metapolitics and Corporate Law Reform. Stanford Law Review, 36

Ruder, D.S. (1965) Public Obligations of Private Corporations. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 114

Stout, L. (2012) The Shareholder Value Myth - How Putting Shareholders First Harms Investors, Corporations, and the Public. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc

Stout, L.A. (2002) Bad and Not-so-Bad Arguments for Shareholder Primacy. Southern California Law Review, 75

Thompson, J.S.C. (2001) Business Planning for Mergers and Acquisitions. Durham: Carolina Academic Press

1

Vasiljević, M.S. (2013) Korporativno upravljanje - Izabrane teme. Beograd: Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije

2

Vasiljević, M. (2009) Korporativno upravljanje i agencijski problemi. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, vol. 57, br. 1, str. 5-24

Vasiljević, M. (2021) Kompanijsko pravo dvadeset i prvog veka. Revija Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava, vol. 3, br. 1, str. 51-91

Weiner, J.L. (1964) The Berle-Dodd Dialogue on the Concept of the Corporation. Columbia Law Review, 64
   

O članku

jezik rada: srpski
vrsta rada: izvorni naučni članak
DOI: 10.5937/RKSPP2102025R
primljen: 10.10.2021.
prihvaćen: 25.10.2021.
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 10.12.2021.

Povezani članci

Nema povezanih članaka