Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:30
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:20

Contents

article: 3 from 11  
Back back to result list
2019, vol. 10, iss. 1, pp. 69-86
Ultima ratio in the light of criminal offence Construction without a building permit (Art. 219a CC)
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law

emailjovanabanovicc@gmail.com
Project:
Penal reaction in Serbia as a key element of rule of law (MESTD - 179051)

Keywords: construction; building permit; ultima ratio (last resort); crimes; restitution claim
Abstract
In this Article, the author explained one of the basic principles of Criminal law - their ultima ratio character as a part of the legitimacy policy. The last resort has been presented as an important method in the law-making process, as well as in its application. Thus, both the parliament and judicial authorities should start from the main purpose of Criminal law, avoiding extensive usage of punitive mechanisms in general and not allowing the prevalling influence of "punitive populism". These theoretical postulates are presented as a fundament for the analysis of the criminal offence Construction without a building permit which is prescribed by the article 219a of the Criminal Code of Serbia. The author showed some imperfections of positive provision such as "the attack on lex certa" as a part of legal principle through the shortcomings of the legislative technical regulation; potential misunderstanding of the "building permit" meaning; restitution claim non-use, despite it can bring some economic benefits. Also, it was emphasized that the same conduct from the Art. 219a CC is (at the most) prescribed by secondary law (Planning and Construction Law) as a commercial offence, which can have proceeding impact onne bis in idem principle. The protected object is vague because "the property" is a little bit far away of administrative procedure which is substantially contained in the following provisions. Also, we point to praxis which is created by public authorities.The potential problem with this incrimination can be non efficiency influence on those to whom is addressed. In the future, the legislator may think about decriminalization of this offence through transforming it in commercial offence or misdemeanor. If it is a "big step" from the sociopolitical aspect, the space for improving current norm will be still opened in a legislative technical way.
References
*** (2005-2016) Krivični zakonik Republike Srbije - KZ. Sl. glasnik RS, br. 85/2005, 88/2005 -ispr., 107/2005 -ispr., 72/2009, 111/2009, 121/2012, 104/2013, 108/2014 i 94/2016
*** (2003-2018) Krivični zakonik Republike Crne Gore. Sl. list RCG, br. 70/2003, 13/2004 -ispr. i 47/2006 i 'Sl. list CG', br. 40/2008, 25/2010, 32/2011, 64/2011 -dr. zakon, 40/2013, 56/2013 - ispr., 14/2015, 42/2015, 58/2015 -dr. zakon, 44/2017 i 49/2018
*** Krivični zakonik Turske / Penal Code of Turkey. Legislationline https://www.legislationline. org/.../Turkey_CC_2004_am2016_, 25. novembar 2018
*** Krivični zakonik Rumunije. https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminalcodes/country/8/Romania/show, 25. novembar 2018
*** (2015-2017) Pravilnik o postupku sprovođenja objedinjene procedure elektronskim putem. Sl. glasnik RS, br. 113/2015, 96/2016 i 120/2017
*** (1990) Town and Country Planning Act 1990: Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. https:// www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/8/contents, 8. mart 2019
*** (2011-2014) Zakonik o krivičnom postupku - ZKP. Sl. glasnik RS, br. 72/2011, 101/2011, 121/2012, 32/2013, 45/2013 i 55/2014
*** Zakon o izmenama i dopunama Krivičnog zakonika. http://www.zakoni.rs/zakon-o-izmenama-i-dopunama-krivicnog-zakonika.pdf, 25. novembar 2018. godine
*** (2008) Zakon o odgovornosti pravnih lica za krivična dela - ZOPLKD. Sl. glasnik RS, br. 97
*** (1977/2005) Zakon o privrednim prestupima - ZPP. Sl. list SFRJ + Sl. list SRJ+ Sl. glasnik RS, br. 4/77, 36/77 -ispr., 14/85, 10/86 (prečišćen tekst), 74/87, 57/89 i 3/90 i, br. 27/92, 16/93, 31/93, 41/93, 50/93, 24/94, 28/96 i 64/2001 i br. 101/2005 -dr. zakon
*** (2009-2017) Zakon o sprečavanju pranja novca i finansiranja terorizma - ZSPNFT. Sl. Glasnik RS, br. 20/2009, 72/2009 i 91/2010 i,,Sl. Glasnik RS', br.113/2017
*** (2006) Ustav Republike Srbije. Sl. glasnik RS, 98
*** (2018) Nacionalna strategija Vlade RSprocena rizika od pranja novca i procena rizika od finansiranja terorizma
*** Smernice za sprečavanje pranja novca. http://www.apml.gov.rs/cyr48/dir/%D0%A1%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B 8%D1%86%D0%B5.html, 30. novembar 2018
*** Documento Unico di Programmazione 2016-2018: Comune di Capri: Permessi di costruire (oneri urbanizzazione). http://ww2.gazzettaamministrativa.it/opencms/export/sites/default/_gazzetta_amministrativa/amministrazione_trasparente/_campania/_capri/130_ bila/010_bil_pre_con/2016/0002_Documenti_1453128681206/1453
*** Gazzeta Ufficiale Della Repubblica Italiana: Serie generale, n°81. http://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/gu/2018/04/07/81/sg/pdf, 8. mart 2019
*** (2018) Odluka Prvog osnovnog javnog tužilaštva u Beogradu. A. br. 352/18 od 28.08
Ashworth, A., Horder, J. (2013) Criminalization. in: Principles of Criminal Law, Oxford University Press, 7th edn, Chapter 2
Bajović, V. (2016) Slučaj Milenković -Ne bis in idem u krivičnom i prekršajnom postupku. in: Đ. Ignjatović [ed.] Kaznena reakcija u Srbiji, VI deo
Begović, B. (2010) Ekonomska teorija generalne prevencije - osnovna pitanja. Crimen, n°1
Cohen, M.R. (1940) Moral Aspects of the Criminal Law. Yale Law Journal, 49(6): 987-987
Delić, N. (2014) Nova rešenja u posebnom delu Krivičnog zakonika Srbije. Beograd
Delić, N. (2015) Criminalisation versus Decriminalisation: The status and perspectives of the Special part of the Serbian Criminal Legislation. in: Đ. Ignjatović [ed.] Kaznena reakcija u Srbiji, V deo
Feinberg, J. (1986) Harm to Self: The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. New York
Husak, D. (2005) Applying Ultima Ratio: A Skeptical Assessment. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 2: 535-535
Husak, D. (2008) Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law. New York: Oxford University Press
Ignjatović, Đ. (2017) Kazneni populizam. in: Đ. Ignjatovi [ed.] Kaznena reakcija u Srbiji, VII deo
Ilić, G.P. (2017) Načelo ne bis in idem u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. Strani pravni život, br. 3, str. 21-34
Jareborg, N. (2005) Criminalization as Last Resort (Ultima ratio). Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 2: 521
Kokolj, M., Marković, M. (2009) Privredno prestupno pravo. Novi Sad
Kuhn, A., Solcà, M. (2018) Recourt-on de manière excessive au système pénal en Suisse?. Revue Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique et Scientifique, Vol. LXXI, nº1
Lasslett, K. (2017) Uncovering the Crimes of Urbanisation: Researching Corruption, Violence and Urban Conflict: Summary and Contents. https://www.routledge.com/Uncovering-the-Crimes-of-Urbanisation-Researching-Corruption-Violence/Lasslett/p/ book/9781138120327, 13. januar 2019. godine
Perović, S., Stojanović, D., Eds (1980) Komentar zakona o obligacionim odnosima. Kragujevac-Novi Sad
Radbruch, G.L. (1936) Jurisprudence in the Criminal Law. Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, Vol. 18, n° 4
Rodriguez, R.C. (2014) Derecho Penal como ultima ratio. Hacia una politica criminal racional. Revista Ius et Praxis, 12-año 14, n°1
Schonsheck, J. (1994) On Criminalization: An Essay in the Philosophy of the Criminal Law. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media
Stojanović, Z. (2016) Krivično pravo - opšti deo. Beograd
Stojanović, Z. (2016) Politika suzbijanja kriminaliteta. Beograd
Stojanović, Z. (2016) Garantivna funkcija krivičnog prava. in: Đ. Ignjatović [ed.] Kaznena reakcija u Srbiji, VI deo
Stojanović, Z. (2018) Komentar Krivičnog zakonika. Beograd
Stojanović, Z. (2013) Da li je Srbiji potrebna reforma krivičnog zakonodavstva?. Crimen, vol. 4, br. 2, str. 119-143
Škulić, M. (2017) Pravna priroda i krivičnopravni - materijalni i procesni - efekat zastarelosti krivičnog gonjenja - II deo. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, vol. 65, br. 1, str. 25-58
Vuković, I. (2015) O opravdanosti tzv. svojeručnih krivičnih dela. in: Đ. Ignjatović [ed.] Kaznena reakcija u Srbiji
 

About

article language: Serbian
document type: Original Scientific Paper
DOI: 10.5937/crimen1901069B
published in SCIndeks: 04/07/2019
Creative Commons License 4.0

Related records