Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:4
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:3

Sadržaj

članak: 1 od 52  
Back povratak na rezultate
2022, vol. 61, br. 96, str. 215-232
Početak izvršenja krivičnog djela u evrokontinentalnom i anglosaksonskom krivičnom pravu
Univerzitet u Banjoj Luci, Fakultet bezbjednosnih nauka, Republika Srpska, BiH

e-adresadragana.vasiljevic@fbn.unibl.org
Sažetak
Jasno i precizno određenje djelatnosti koja označava početak izvršenja krivičnog djela, kao granica između načelno nekažnjivog i kažnjivog stadijuma njegovog ostvarenja, od velikog je značaja za krivično pravo. Prilikom određivanja ove granice savremena krivična zakonodavstva i doktrina krivičnog prava se rukovode različitim kriterijumima. U evrokontinentalnom pravnom sistemu određenje pokušajne djelatnosti pronalazi se u teorijama, dok se krivična zakonodavstva u anglosaksonskom krivičnopravnom sistemu u svojoj kazuistici više oslanjaju na odgovarajuće testove. U članku se analiziraju teorijska i zakonodavna rješenja početka izvršenja krivičnog djela i njegovog razgraničenja od stadijuma pripremanja, koja su prisutna u ovim sistemima.
Reference
*** (2015) Criminal code of the Republic of Finland (1889, amended 2015). https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/1889/en18890039.pdf, 16.4.2018
*** Criminal Code of Swiss Confederation, of 21. December 1937, Amended 2017. Preuzeto 1. 2. 2022. https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/54/757_781_799/en
*** Penal Code of the French Republic, updated 12. 10. 2005. Preuzeto 3. 1. 2022. https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/3316/file/France_Criminal%20Code%20updated%20on%2012-10-2005.pdf
*** (1998) Rome Statute of the international criminal court. United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 2187, No. 38544. Preuzeto 11. 1. 2022. https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/RS-Eng.pdf
*** Model Penal Code. Preuzeto 18. 10. 2021. https://www.Pravo.unizg.hr
*** (2011-2019) Kazneni zakon Republike Hrvatske. Narodne novine RH, Br. 125/11, 144/12, 56/15, 61/15, 101/17, 118/18 i 126/19
Becker, C.L. (1974) Criminal Attempt and the Theory of the Law of Crimes. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 3(3): 262-294
Beulke, W. (2018) Klausurenkurs im Straafrecht III. Heidelberg: C.F.Müller
Bohlander, M. (2009) Principles of German criminal law. u: Studies in international and Comparative Criminal Law, Oregon-Oxford-Portland
Bowes, S.F. (1928) Criminal Attempts. Harvard Law Review, 41(7). 821-859
Cambell, C.M. (2013) Crossing the Rubicons An Argument for Adopting the Model Penal Code Formulation of Criminal Attempt in Massachusetts. New England Law Review, 47: 949-983
Clarkson, M.V.C. (2009) Attempt: The Conduct Requirement. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1): 25-41
Duff, R.A. (2012) Guiding Commitments and Criminal Liability for Attempts. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 6(3): 411-427
Duff, R.A. (2004) Criminal Attempts. Oxford: Clarendon Pres
Enker, N.A. (1977) Mens rea and Criminal Attempt. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 4. 845-879
Fishman, R.M. (2015) Defining Attempts: Mandujanos Eror. Duke Law Journal, 65: 346-384
Freund, G., Rostalski, F. (2019) Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer
Gropp, W. (2015) Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer
Hall, J. (1940) Criminal Attempt: A Study of Foundations of Criminal Liability. Yale Law Journal, 49(5): 789-840
Hamish, S. (2001) The Centrality of the Act Requirement for Criminal Attempts. University of Toronto Law Journal, 51: 399-424
Jakobs, G. (1991) Strafrecht, Allgemeiner Teil. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter
Jefferson, M. (2007) Criminal law. Harlow: Pearson education
Klotter, J., Pollock, J. (2006) Criminal Law. Anderson Publishing
Mathis, S. (2004) Criminal Attempts and the Subjectivism/Objectivism Debate. Ratio Juris, 17(3): 328-345
Maurach, R.G.K., Zipf, H., Dölling, H., Laue, D., Renzikowski, J.C. (2014) Strafrecht Allgemeinre Teil. Heidelberg: C. F. Müller
Milić, I.D. (2017) Da li je krivično delo uvek najteže kazneno delo? - II deo. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, vol. 51, br. 2, str. 405-415
Novoselec, P. (2008) Razgraničenje pripremnih radnji i pokušaja. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, 29(2): 721-759
Roxin, C. (2003) Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil (Band II Besondere Erscheiunungsformen der Straftat). München: Verlag C.H. Beck, 19-55
Safferling, J.M.C. (2006) Die Abgrenzung zwischen strafloser Vorbereitung und strafbarem Versuch im deutschen, europäischen und im Völkerstrafrecht. Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 118(3): 682-716
Schönke, A., Schröder, H. (2010) Strafgesetztbuch Kommentar. München: Verlag C.H. Beck
Shahar, O.B., Harel, A. (1996) The economics of the Law of Criminal Attempts: A Victim-centered perspective. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 145: 299-351
Sim, P.B.A. (1955) The Actus Reus in Criminal Attempts. Modern Law Review, 18(6). 620-623
Vuković, I. (2021) Krivično pravo - opšti deo. Beograd: Pravni fakultet
Wishart, H. (2013) Criminal Culpability, Criminal Attempts and the Erosion of the Choice Theory. Journal of Criminal Law, 77(1): 78-90
 

O članku

jezik rada: srpski
vrsta rada: pregledni članak
DOI: 10.5937/zrpfn1-40271
primljen: 21.09.2022.
prihvaćen: 04.11.2022.
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 24.12.2022.
metod recenzije: dvostruko anoniman
Creative Commons License 4.0

Povezani članci

Nema povezanih članaka