2012, vol. 46, br. 3, str. 107-120
|
|
O oročavanju radnji suda u parničnom postupku
On the time limiting of the court acts in Civil Procedure
Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Pravni fakultet, Srbija
Sažetak
Efikasnost pravne zaštite u parničnom postupku prestavlja jedan od osnovnih razloga za opravdanje veoma čestih promena parnične regulative. U tom cilju, pored postojećih, uveden je niz novih rešenja. Navedeni značaj ima i nova regulativa kojom se teži ograničiti trajanje postupka. Uvodi se obaveza određivanja vremenskog okvira za sprovođenje postupka a u nizu procesnih situacija preduzimanje procesnih radnji suda ograničava određivanjem rokova. Nepoštovanje navedenih vremenskih ograničenja ostaje procesno nesankcinisano ali je osnov za utvrđivanje disciplinske odgovornosti postupajućeg sudije. Rešenje je usvojeno u cilju povećanja efikasnosti pravne zaštite i ostvarivanja suđenja u razumnom roku čemu može poslužiti ali samo pod uslovom stvaranja realnih preduslova za uspešno funkcionisanje sudske vlasti. U suprotnom pretvoriće se samo u još jedno sredstvo pritiska na sudstvo i postupajuće sudije.
Abstract
The efficiency of the legal protection in litigation presents one of the main reasons for the quite frequent legislature changes of the Civil Procedure. To achieve this goal a number of new provisions was introduced. Given meaning has a new regulation which tends to limit the duration of the litigation as well. Litigation timeframe is in that sense introduced, and on the other hand in number of situations court management acts are time limited. The non complying of the time limits remains non sanctioned in procedural sense, but it represents a cause for a disciplinary responsibility of the judge. This mechanism was introduced to speed up litigation and to fulfill parties' right for a judgment in reasonable time and it could achieve these goals, but only with creating real prerequisites for successful functioning of the courts. If not it will transform itself in just another mean of the pressure on the judges.
|