CM - časopis za upravljanje komuniciranjem
kako citirati ovaj članak
podeli ovaj članak


  • citati u SCIndeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:2
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:2


članak: 3 od 8  
Back povratak na rezultate
2013, vol. 8, br. 27, str. 5-33
Difficulties for eGovernment promotion in Serbia: The analysis of eUprava portal
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
University of Szeged, National University of Public Service, Szeged, Hungary

Ključne reči: eAdministration; eGovernment; eUprava; good governance; DEG; communication plan
(ne postoji na srpskom)
We want to make clear there are no recipes for good communication of eGovernment. Good solutions, brave attempts to involve the public in eGovernment are the only examples what we can follow in this specific area of government. We will introduce theories and analysis of eGovernment environment in this article, which may be useful in designing a promotion and communication plan for the portal eUprava as a central site of Serbian eGovernment. After the general characteristics of society and communication in the world of eAdministration, we will introduce a dilemma, which strains between the good government and good governance. One section will be about a theory on good governance, the Digital Era Governance (DEG) and one on the barriers of the communication. The last section will analyze and discuss the eUprava portal. We will use PEST and SWOT analysis to detect the most urgent problems for the possible promotion of the portal.
*** (2012) E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People. New York: United Nations
Barber, B. (1984) Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
Borras, J. (2012) The OASIS Transformational Government Framework. European Journal of ePractice, (15): 26-51
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., Tinkler, J. (2006) Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State and E-Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H. (2010) The second wave of digital era governance. u: paper presented at American Political Science Association Conference, Washington, (4)
E.C. - European Commission (2009) Ministerial declaration on e-government Malmö. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/sites/digital-agenda/files/ministerial-declaration-on-egovernment-malmo.pdf
European Commission (2010) The European e-government action plan 2011-2015: Harnessing ICT to promote smart, sustainable & innovative government. Brussels, https://ec.europa.eu/digitalagenda/en/european-egovernment-action-plan-2011-2015
Georgiou, M., Haddon, L., Helsper, E., Wang, Y. (2010) Existential field 8: Special focus pieces. u: Family Platform Project, London: LSE
Ha, H., Coghill, K. (2008) E-Government in Singapore - A SWOT and PEST Analysis. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 6(2), 103-130
Helsper, E.J. (2012) A Corresponding Fields Model for the Links Between Social and Digital Exclusion. Communication Theory, 22(4): 403-426
Karabulut, A., Braet, D., Lindstrom, D., Niederhauser, D. (2009) Student level of commitment and engagement with Ning as a learning management system. u: Maddux C.D. [ur.] Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education 2009, Chesapeake: SITE, 125-132
Livingstone, S., Helsper, E. (2010) Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers' use of the internet: the role of online skills and internet self-efficacy. New Media & Society, 12(2): 309-329
Merkovity, N. (2011) A New Public Managmenttől a Digital Era Governanceig: Kormányzás paradigmák a nyolcvanas évektől a millenniumi évekig [From New Public Management to Digital Era Governance: Governance paradigms from the eighties until the Millennium years]. De Iurisp. Jogés Politikatudományi Folyuirat, 5(3): 100-120
Mominу, J.M., Meneses, J. (2007) Digital inequalities in children and young people: A technological matter?. u: 2nd International Convention on New Millennium Learners: Schools, ICT and Learning, Florence, Italy
Mumtaz, S. (2001) Children's enjoyment and perception of computer use in the home and the school. Computers & Education, 36(4): 347-362
Pew Internet (2012) Digital differences. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Digital-differences.aspx
Prieto-Martín, P., de Marcos, L., Martínez, J.J. (2012) The E-(R)evolution will not be Funded. European Journal of ePractice, (15): 62-89
Schlosser, A.E., Shavitt, S., Kanfer, A. (1999) Survey of Internet users' attitudes toward Internet advertising. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 13, 34-54
Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (2011) Usage of information: Communication technologies in the Republic of Serbia. http://webrzs.stat.gov.rs/WebSite/public/PublicationView.aspx?pKey=41&pLevel=1&pubType=2&pubKey=728
Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (2012) Usage of information: Communication technologies in the Republic of Serbia. http://webrzs.stat.gov.rs/WebSite/repository/documents/00/00/78/89/Saopstenje_2012_engl.pdf
Szittner, K. (2011) e-Ügyintézés Magyarországon [e-Administration in Hungary]. Budapest: e-Government Alapítvány
van Dijk, J.A.G.M. (2005) The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications
Witte, J.C., Mannon, S.E. (2010) The internet and social inequalities. New York: Routledge
Zillien, N., Hargittai, E. (2009) Digital Distinction: Status-Specific Types of Internet Usage. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2): 274-291

O članku

jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: neklasifikovan
DOI: 10.5937/comman1327005M
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 25.11.2013.

Povezani članci