- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:4
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:4
|
|
|
2021, vol. 3, br. 1, str. 167-188
|
|
Uticaj istorije državnosti na ekonomsku razvijenost zemalja
The impact of the history of statehood on the economic development of countries
Projekat: Rizici finansijskih institucija i tržišta u Srbiji - mikroekonomski i makroekonomski pristup (MPNTR - 179005)
Ključne reči: istorija državnosti; efikasnost države; ekonomska razvijenost
Sažetak
U radu se istražuje uticaj istorije državnosti, kao dela istorijskog nasleđa, na sadašnji nivo ekonomske razvijenosti zemalja. Istorija državnosti utiče na efikasnost države u obavljanju funkcija koje su važne za funkcionisanje privrede i njen napredak, kao što su kvalitet institucija, ekonomska politika, obrazovanje, infrastruktura i dr. Empirijska istraživanja uglavnom potkrepljuju postojanje veze između dužine državnosti zemalja i njihovog nivoa ekonomske razvijenosti u obliku obrnutog slova U, što znači da najrazvijenije zemlje imaju "srednju" dužinu državnosti. Zemlje sa "srednjom" dužinom državnosti su mogle da uče na greškama starijih država, a imale su dovoljno vremena da izgrade državne kapacitete. Veza između istorije državnosti i nivoa ekonomske razvijenosti zemalja je snažnija ako se državnost meri na osnovu istorije državnosti populacije koja naseljava sadašnje zemlje, nego na osnovu istorije državnosti teritorije savremenih zemalja. Ovaj rezultat je u skladu sa empirijskim istraživanjima prema kojima su socijalne norme i oblici ponašanja koji su važni za funkcionisanje države relativno postojani tokom vremena.
Abstract
The paper investigates the impact of the history of statehood, as a part of historical heritage, on the current level of economic development of countries. The history of statehood affects the efficiency of the state in performing functions that are important for the functioning of the economy and its progress, such as the quality of institutions, economic policy, education, infrastructure, etc. Empirical research mainly supports the existence of a link between the length of statehood of countries and their level of economic development in the form of an inverted letter "U", which means that the most developed countries have "medium" length of statehood. Countries with "medium" length of statehood could learn from the mistakes of older states, and had enough time to build state capacities. The connection between the history of statehood and the level of economic development of countries is stronger if statehood is measured on the basis of the history of statehood of the population inhabiting present countries, rather than on the basis of the history of statehood in modern countries. This result is consistent with empirical research according to which social norms and forms of behavior that are important for the functioning of the state are relatively stable over time.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
| |
Novododat članak: provera, normiranje i linkovanje referenci u toku. |
|
|
Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Robinson J. A., "The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation", American Economic Review, No. 5, Vol. 91, 2001
|
|
|
Barro R., "Determinants of Economic Growth in a Panel of Countries", Annals of Economics and Finance, Issue 2, Vol. 4, 2003
|
|
|
Bockstette V., Chanda A., Putterman L., "States and markets: The advantage of an early start", Journal of Economic Growth, No. 4, Vol. 7, 2002
|
|
|
Borcan O., Olsson O., Putterman L., "State history and economic development: evidence from six millennia", Journal of Economic Growth, No. 1, Vol. 23, 2018
|
|
|
Gorodnichenko Y., Roland G., "Culture, institutions and the wealth of nations", Review Economic Statatistics, No. 3, Vol. 99, 2017
|
|
|
Iliev P., Putterman L., "Social capability, history and the economies of communist and postcommunist states", Studies in Comparative International Development, No. 1, Vol. 42, 2007
|
|
|
Lucas R., "On the Mechanics of Economic Development", Journal of Monetary Economy, Issue 1, Vol. 22, 1988
|
|
|
Nenadović M. Memoari, Narodna knjiga -Politika, Beograd, 2005
|
|
|
Olson, M. Uspon i sumrak naroda: ekonomski rast, stagflacija i društvena rigidnost, Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 2011
|
|
|
Rodrik D., Subramanian A., Trebbi F., "Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development", Journal of Economic Growth, No. 2, Vol. 9, 2004
|
|
|
Romer P. M., "Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth", Journal of Political Economy, No. 5, Vol. 94, 1986
|
|
|
Romer P. M., "Endogenous Technological Change", Journal of Political Economy, No. 5, Part 2, Vol. 98, 1990
|
|
|
Sachs J., "Institutions Don't Rule: Direct Effects of Geography on Per Capita Income", NBER Working Paper 9490, 2003
|
|
|
Spolaore E., Wacziarg R., "How Deep Are the Roots of Economic Development?", Journal of Economic Literature, No. 2, Vol. 51, 2013
|
|
|
Veber M., Protestantska etika i duh kapitalizma, Mediterran publishing, Novi Sad, 2011
|
|
|
|
|