Strategic Management
how to cite this article
share this article


  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:16
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:11


article: 1 from 363  
Back back to result list
Online First
Assessing sustainable economic development efficiency: A DEA approach
aSv. Kliment Ohridski University, Faculty of Economics, Bitola, Prilep, North Macedonia
bUniversity of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
cUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of Economy, Subotica, Serbia
Background: Widely used in efficiency analysis, data envelopment analysis (DEA) found its use in country efficiency measurement concerning the achievement of desired values of macroeconomic indicators, most often the goals from the category of economic growth. Purpose: The objective of the paper is to examine the possibility of DEA application in sustainable development research. Methodology: The analysis was conducted using a non-oriented DEA model with variable return-to-scale in a group of 26 EU countries and Serbia, as a membership candidate. Four variables were used as input variables: inflation rate, unemployment rate, poverty rate and ecological footprint per capita. Three variables were used on the outputs side: inequality-adjusted human development index, GDP per capita and ecological deficit or reserve per capita. The annual data was collected for the time period of eight years, form 2010 until 2017. Findings: Results show that Finland is the only country efficient throughout the entire period. Average efficiency close to maximum was achieved by the Netherlands. Significant efficiency was achieved by Luxembourg, Germany and Sweden among countries that were EU members before 1995. Among other EU countries, Slovenia and Hungary achieved efficiency on a nearly maximum level. Also, efficient in more than half of the observed years were Cyprus and Romania. The most inefficient countries were the three Baltic countries: Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia. Among the EU member countries before 1995, Italy and Portugal were the most inefficient. Concerning EU candidate Serbia, the efficiency achieved was generally close to average. Limitations: The performed analysis can answer the question of which country is the most efficient on the way to sustainability. However, the DEA method cannot show whether a country is developing absolutely sustainably or unsustainably, because DEA is a relative method and can only measure efficiency compared to the other units.
Article uploaded retrospectively: references checking, normalizing and linking in progress.
Acemoglu, D. (2012). Introduction to economic growth. Journal of economic theory, 147(2), 545-550.
Afonso, A. & St. Aubyn, M. (2013). Public and private inputs in aggregate production and growth -a crosscountry efficiency approach, Applied Economics, 45(32), 4487-4502.
Alkire, S., & Foster, J. E. (2010). Designing the inequalityadjusted human development index, OPHI working paper no. 37, University of Oxford.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
Bojović, V. (2011). Sustainable development -multiple meanings yet unambiguous necessity. Economic Themes, 2, 175-192.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2(6), 429-444.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1981). Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: an application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Management science 27(6), 668-697.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Golany, B., Seiford, L., & Stutz, J. (1985). Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of econometrics, 30(1-2), 91-107.
Cook, W. D., & Seiford, L. M. (2009). Data envelopment analysis (DEA) -thirty years on. European Journal of Operational Research 192(1), 1-17.
Farrell, M.J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 3, 253-290. DOI: 10.2307/2343100
Global Footprint Network. Open Data Platform, Retrieved January 24, 2022 from
Golany, B., & Thore, S. (1997). The economic and social performance of nations: efficiency and returns to scale. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 31(3), 191-204.
Halkos, G., Tzeremes N., & Kourtzidis, S. (2015). Measuring sustainable efficiency using a two-stage data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(5), 1159-1175.
He, J., Wan, Y., Feng, L., Ai, J., & Wang, Y. (2016). An integrated data envelopment analysis and energybased ecological footprint methodology in evaluating sustainable development, a case study of Jiangsu Province, China. Ecological Indicators, 70, 23-34.
Koišová, E., Grmanova, E., Škrovánková, K., & Kostrova, J. (2019). Competitiveness of regions in the Visegrád group countries. Engineering Economics, 30(2), 203-210.
Koopmans, T. C. (1951). Efficient allocation of resources. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 455-465.
Krivonozhko, V. E., Utkin, O. B., Volodin, A. V., Sablin, I. A., & Patrin, M. (2004). Constructions of economic functions and calculations of marginal rates in DEA using parametric optimization methods. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(10), 1049-1058.
Kubiszewski, I., Costanza, R., Franco, C., Lawn, P., Talberth, J., Jackson, T., & Aylmer, C. (2013). Beyond GDP: Measuring and achieving global genuine progress. Ecological economics, 93, 57-68.
Labaj, M., Luptacik, M., & Nezinsky, E. (2014). Data envelopment analysis for measuring economic growth in terms of welfare beyond GDP. Empirica, 41, 407-424.
Lin, D., Wackernagel, M., Galli, A., & Kelly, R. (2015). Ecological footprint: informative and evolving -a response to van den Bergh and Grazi (2014). Ecological indicators, 58, 464-468.
Marcikić Horvat, A., Radovanov, B., & Sedlak, O. (2021). Comparative efficiency analysis of economic growth using a nonparametric approach . Proceedings of The 2nd World Conference on Management, Business, and Economics, 2021, 15-17 October 2021, Budapest (Hungary), Diamond Scientific Publishing. ISBN: 978-609-485-232-9.
Mardani, A., Zavadskas, E., Streimikiene, D., Jusoh, A., & Khoshnoudi, M. (2017). A comprehensive review of data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach in energy efficiency. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70(1), 1298-1322.
Mardani, A., Streimikiene, D., Balezentis, T., Saman, M., Nor, K., & Khoshnava, S. (2018). Data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental economics: an overview of the state-of-the-art and recent development trends. Energies, 11(8), 2002.
Martić, M., Novaković, M., & Baggia, A. (2009). Data envelopment analysis-basic models and their utilization. Organizacija, 42(2), 37-43.
Matsumoto, K., Makridou, G., & Doumpos, M. (2020). Evaluating environmental performance using data envelopment analysis: the case of European countries. Journal of cleaner production, 272, 122637.
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. H., Randers, J., & Behrens III, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth: a report to the club of Rome (1972).
Petrov, V., Trivić, N., & Ćelić, Đ. (2018). Assessing sustainability of the Southeast European economies. Economics of Agriculture, 65(2), 519-529.
Portela, M. S., Thanassoulis, E., & Simpson, G. (2004). Negative data in DEA: a directional distance approach applied to bank branches. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(10), 1111-1121.
Rahmani S., Matin R.K., Khunsiavash M., & Moghadas Z. (2020). Cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis with stochastic data: a chance-constrained programming approach, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 54(2), 129-149.
Sachs, J. D., & McArthur, J. W. (2005). The millennium project: a plan for meeting the millennium development goals. The Lancet, 365(9456), 347-353.
Sachs, J. D. (2012). From millennium development goals to sustainable development goals. The Lancet, 379(9832), 2206-2211.
Sarkis, J. (2007). Preparing your data for DEA. In Modeling data irregularities and structural complexities in data envelopment analysis (pp. 305-320). Springer, Boston, MA.
Sarkodie, S. A. (2021). Environmental performance, biocapacity, carbon & ecological footprint of nations: drivers, trends and mitigation options. Science of the Total Environment, 751, 141912.
Škare, M., & Rabar, D. (2016). Measuring economic growth using data envelopment analysis. Amfiteatru Economic Journal, 18(42), 386-406. Available at:
Škare, M., & Rabar, D. (2017). Measuring sources of economic growth in OECD countries. Engineering Economics, 28(4), 386-400.
Sueyoshi, T., Yuan, Y., & Goto, M. (2017). A literate study for DEA applied to energy and environment. Energy Economics, 62(1), 104-124.
United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Data Centre, Retrieved January 24, 2022 from
United Nations Millennium Summit, & United Nations. (2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration. New York: United Nations, Dept. of Public Information.
Van den Bergh, J. C. (2009). The GDP paradox. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(2), 117-135.
Van den Bergh, J. C. (2022). A procedure for globally institutionalizing a 'beyond-GDP'metric. Ecological Economics, 192, 107257.
Wang, Z., & Feng, C. (2015). A performance evaluation of the energy, environmental, and economic efficiency and productivity in China: an application of global data envelopment analysis. Applied Energy, 147, 617-626. 1.108
Wang, S., Ren, H., Liang, L., Li, J., & Wang, Z. (2022). The effect of economic development on carbon intensity of human well-being: evidence from spatial econometric analyses. Journal of Cleaner Production, 364, 132632.
The World Bank. World Bank Open Data, Retrieved January 24, 2022 from


article language: English
document type: unclassified
DOI: 10.5937/StraMan2300039S
received: 28/09/2022
revised: 15/11/2022
revised: 21/12/2022
accepted: 23/12/2022
published online: 20/03/2023
published in SCIndeks: 17/03/2023

Related records

No related records