Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:10
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:7

Contents

article: 4 from 359  
Back back to result list
2021, vol. 60, iss. 90, pp. 97-118
Reasonable time frame in bankruptcy proceedings: Analysis of cases from the judicial practice of the Commercial Court in Niš
Univeristy of Niš, Faculty of Law
Project:
Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia (Institution: Univeristy of Niš, Faculty of Law) (MESTD - 451-03-68/2020-14/200120)

Abstract
The Act on the Protection of the Right to a Trial within a Reasonable Time, which took effect in 2016, has created the conditions in our legal system for the protection of the right to a trial within a reasonable time, as one of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia and related international documents. Although the legislator does not explicitly provide for the application of this Act in the context of bankruptcy proceedings, it has been used in judicial practice as a mean for the bankruptcy creditors to obtain just satisfaction in cases involving lengthy bankruptcy proceedings and a violation of the right to a fair trial within a reasonable time. The subject matter of analysis in this paper is the right to a trial within a reasonable time in bankruptcy cases. For that purpose, the authors examine the case law of the Commercial Court in Niš in the period from the beginning of 2016 to the end of 2019, particularly focusing on the bankruptcy cases in which complaints (objections) were filed for the protection of the right to a fair trial within a reasonable time. The aim of the research is to examine whether the objection, as an initial act, is a suitable instrument for increasing the efficiency of the bankruptcy proceeding, or whether it only serves to satisfy the interests of creditors. The authors have also examined whether this remedy affects the overall costs and duration of the bankruptcy proceeding. The main finding is that there is an increasing number of objections in the Commercial Court in Niš, which still does not affect the length and costs of bankruptcy. This trend is not only the result of inactivity of the court and the complexity of certain cases but also of numerous external factors, the most prominent of which is the work of some state bodies.
References
*** (2016) Ustav Republike Srbije. Službeni glasnik RS, Br. 98
*** (2015) Zakon o zaštiti prava na suđenje u razumnom roku. Službeni glasnik RS, Br. 40
*** (2007-2015) Zakon o ustavnom sudu. Službeni glasnik RS, Br. 109/2007, 99/2011, 18/13-Odluka US, 40/15 i 103/15
*** Predlog Zakona o zaštiti prava na suđenje u razumnom roku. Preuzeto 16.3.2020. http://www.parlament.gov.rs/upload/archive/files/lat/pdf/predlozi_zakona/926 15.%20lat.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2WSEkCiP6HbMTlof-Y1WQ_4B37 GWUyDD24P5zELypV5_3Kqv4ShzxbTWs
*** (1978-2020) Zakon o obligacionim odnosima. Službeni glasnik SFRJ + Službeni glasnik SRJ + Službeni glasnik SCG + Službeni glasnik RS, Br. 29/78, 39/85, 45/89 - odluka USJ i 57/89. Br. 31/93. Br. 1/2003 - Ustavna povelja. Br. 18
*** (2011-2020) Zakon o parničnom postupku. Službeni glasnik RS, Br. 72/2011, 49/2013 - odluka US, 74/2013 -odluka US, 55/2014, 87/2018 i 18/2020
*** (2009-2018) Zakon o stečaju. Službeni glasnik RS, Br. 104/2009, 99/2011 - dr. zakon, 71/2012 - odluka US, 83/2014, 113/2017, 44/2018 i 95/2018
*** (2008-2017) Zakon o sudijama. Službeni glasnik RS, Br. 116/2008, 58/2009 -odluka US, 104/2009, 101/2010, 8/2012 -odluka US, 121/2012, 124/2012 - odluka US, 101/2013, 111/2014 - odluka US, 117/2014, 40/2015, 63/2015 -odluka US, 106/2015, 63/2016 - odlu
*** (2008-2018) Zakon o uređenju sudova. Službeni glasnik RS, Br. 116/2008, 104/2009, 101/2010, 31/2011 - dr. zakon, 78/2011 - dr. zakon, 101/2011, 101/2013, 106/2015, 40/2015 - dr. zakon, 13/2016, 108/2016, 113/2017, 65/2018 - odluka US, 87/2018 i 88/2018 -odlu
*** (2007) Povelja o osnovnim pravima Evropske unije. Preuzeto 13.5.2020. http://www.vladars.net/sr-SP-Cyrl/Vlada/Ministarstva/meoi/Documents/Povelja%20o%20osnovim%20pravima%20EU%20%20Prevod_354037522.pdf
Agencija Za Licenciranje Stečajnih Upravnika Alsu (2021) Tabele prosečnog vremena trajanja stečajnih postupaka. Preuzeto: 24.1.2021. https://www.alsu.gov.rs/bap/upload/documents/statistika/prosecno_vreme_trajanja_stecajnih_postupaka.pdf
Andrejević, S. (2014) Pravo na pravično suđenje - razumni rok. in: Kriterijumi za ocenu povrede prava na suđenje u razumnom roku Evropskog suda za ljudska prava prema izveštaju SEREJ-a, [Elektronska verzija]. Preuzeto 4.4.2020. https://www.vk.sud.rs/sites/default/files/attachments/Kriterijumi%20za%20 ocenu%20povrede%20prava%20na%20sudjenje%20u%20razumnom%20 roku_0.pdf
Begović, B., Labus, M., Jovanović, A. (2013) Ekonomija za pravnike. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet
Klajn, I., Šipka, M. (2008) Veliki rečnik stranih reči i izraza. Novi Sad: Prometej
Lilić, S. (2007) Da li je ustavna žalba efikasni pravni lek za suđenje u razumnom roku?. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, vol. 55, br. 2, str. 67-85
Manojlović-Andrić, K., Milutinović, Lj., Andrejević, S., Rodić, V., Kršikapa, M., Bajić, M. (2018) Kriterijumi za ocenu povrede prava na suđenje u razumnom roku. Preuzeto 12.3.2020. https://rm.coe.int/kriterijumi-za-ocenu-povredeprava-na-sudjenje-u-razumnom-roku/16808c5848
Ministarstvo pravde Republike Srbije Obrazloženje Zakona o zaštiti prava na suđenje u razumnom roku. preuzeto 9. 9. 2020
Radović, M. (2020) Zaštita prava na suđenje u razumnom roku u stečajnom postupku. Preuzeto 16.3.2020.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338548856_ZASTITA_PRAVA_NA_SUDJENJE_U_RAZUMNOM_ROKU_U_STE-CAJNOM_POSTUPKU
Radulović, B., Radović, M. (2020) Bias and predictability in judicial decisions involving corporate restructuring: Evidence from Serbia. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade, vol. 68, br. 2, str. 80-99
Roagna, I. (2018) The right to trial within reasonable time under Article 6 ECHR: A practical handbook. Horizontal facility for Western Balkans and Turkey, Preuzeto 1.4.2020. https://rm.coe.int/the-right-to-trial-withinreasonable-time-eng/16808e712c
Savet Evrope Evropska konvencija o ljudskim pravima sa izmenama predviđenim Protokolima 11 i 14 i sa Protokolima 1, 4, 6, 7, 12, 13 i 16. Preuzeto 3.9.2020
Vrhovni kasacioni sud (2015) Zaštita prava na suđenje u razumnom roku u sudskom postupku. Preuzeto 20.5.2020. https://www.vk.sud.rs/sites/default/files/attachments/%D0%97%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%83_0.pdf
 

About

article language: Serbian
document type: Review Paper
DOI: 10.5937/zrpfn0-28624
received: 30/09/2020
accepted: 10/02/2021
published in SCIndeks: 23/07/2021
peer review method: double-blind
Creative Commons License 4.0

Related records

Anali Pravnog fak Beograd (2008)
Presumption of innocence and freedom of media
Bajović Vanja

Anali Pravnog fak Beograd (2009)
Enforcement procedure and right to a fair trial: European context and new Serbian legislation
Šobat Marija, et al.

Anali Pravnog fak Beograd (2012)
Theoretical and legal framework of constitutional complaint
Simović Darko

show all [42]