Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:11
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:7

Sadržaj

članak: 2 od 37  
Back povratak na rezultate
2020, vol. 59, br. 87, str. 145-164
Značaj inata u ekonomskoj analizi parnice
Univerzitet u Nišu, Pravni fakultet

e-adresamojasevic@prafak.ni.ac.rs, bradulovic@ius.bg.ac.rs
Projekat:
Rad je rezultat istraživanja na projektu "Usklađivanje prava Srbije sa pravom Evropske unije", koji finansira Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Nišu, u periodu od 2013-2020. godine

Ključne reči: inat; parnica; poravnanje; ekonomska analiza
Sažetak
Predmet ovog rada jeste inat, kao pojam i posebna društvena preferencija i inadžijsko ponašanje. Rad razmatra značaj inata i njegove implikacije u analizi parničnog postupka i izbora između suđenja i poravnanja. Inat i inadžijsko ponašanje se posmatraju iz ugla različitih disciplina ekonomske nauke (biheviorističke i eksperimentalne ekonomije, ekonomske analize prava), kao i psihologije i evolucione biologije. Primat se daje definiciji inata iz biheviorističko-ekonomskog aspekta, kao spremnosti na nanošenje štete drugom po cenu snošenja sopstvenih troškova. U radu se prikazuju statistički podaci o broju parničnih postupaka u Srbiji, zajedno sa uporednim podacima, i pritom se raspravljaju moguće implikacije inata, odnosno inadžijskog ponašanja na broj parničnih postupaka. Rad postavlja konceptualni okvir za dalja empirijska istraživanja inata i njegovog značaja u donošenju odluke o pokretanju parničnog postupka i/ili izbora između suđenja i poravnanja kako bi se dobio odgovor na pitanje da li građani Srbije vole da se parniče i koja je uloga inata u tome.
Reference
*** Godišnji izveštaji Vrhovnog kasacionog suda o radu sudova. https://www.vk.sud.rs/sr-lat/godi%C5%A1nji-izve%C5%A1taj-o-radu-sudova
Almakias, S., Weiss, A. (2012) Ultimatum Game behavior in light of attachment theory. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(3), 515-526
Andreoni, J. (1989) Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447-1458
Andreoni, J., Miller, J. (2002) Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica, 70(2), 737-753
Begović, B., Labus, M., Jovanović, A. (2013) Ekonomija za pravnike. Pravni fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu
Bolton, G.E., Ockenfels, A. (2000) ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90(1), 166-193
Cooter, R., Marks, S., Mnookin, R. (1982) Bargaining in the shadow of the law: A testable model of strategic behavior. Journal of Legal Studies, 11(2), 225-251
Cross, F. (2000) In praise of irrational plaintiffs. Cornell Law Review, 86(1), 1-32
Cullis, J., Jones, P., Soliman, A. (2012) 'Spite effects' in tax evasion experiments. Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(4), 418-423
Dufwenberg, M., Kirchsteiger, G. (2004) A theory of sequential reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 47(2), 268-298
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) (2018) European judicial systems efficiency and quality of justice. Cepej Studies, (26)
Falk, A., Fischbacher, U. (2005) Modeling strong reciprocity. u: Gintis H., Bowles S., Boyd R., Fehr E. [ur.] Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life, Cambridge: The mit Press, 193-214
Falk, A., Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U. (2005) Driving forces behind informal sanctions. Econometrica, 73(6), 2017-2030
Falk, A., Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U. (2008) Testing theories of fairness-Intentions matter. Games and Economic Behavior, 62(1), 287-303
Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U. (2005) The economics of strong reciprocity. u: Gintis H., Bowles S., Boyd R., Fehr E. [ur.] Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life, Cambridge: The mit Press, 151-192
Fehr, E., Schmidt, K.M. (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817-868
Fehr, E., Schmidt, K.M. (2006) The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism: Experimental evidence and new theories. u: Kolm S.-K., Ythier J.M. [ur.] Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity, Elsevier, 1, 1-886
Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U. (2002) Why social preferences matter: The impact of non-selfish motives on competition, cooperation and incentives. Economic Journal, 112(478), C1-C33
Gardner, A., West, S.A. (2004) Spite and the scale of competition. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17(6), 1195-1203
Gintis, H. (2000) Strong reciprocity and human sociality. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 206(2), 169-179
Guth, W., van Damme, E. (1998) Information, strategic behavior, and fairness in ultimatum bargaining: An experimental study. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 42(2-3), 227-247
Hamburger, H. (1979) Games as models of social phenomena. San Francisco: W H Freeman & Co
Hamilton, W.D. (1970) Selfish and spiteful behaviour in an evolutionary model. Nature, 228(5277), 1218-1220
Harrison, J.L. (2018) Spite: Legal and social implications. Lewis & Clark Law Review, 22(3), 991-1026
Jolls, C., Sunstein, C.R., Thaler, R. (1998) A behavioral approach to law and economics. Stanford Law Review, 50(5), 1471-1550
Jovanović, B. (2008) Psihologija inata. Polja - časopis za književnost i teoriju, 2008(454), 116-122
Jovanović, B. (2008) Prkos i inat - etnopsihološke studije. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike
Kirchsteiger, G. (1994) The role of envy in ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 25(1994), 373-389
Klajn,, Šipka, M. (2008) Veliki rečnik stranih reči i izraza. Novi Sad: Prometej
Lehmann, L., Bargum, K., Reuter, M. (2006) An evolutionary analysis of the relationship between spite and altruism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 19(5), 1507-1516
Levine, D. (1998) Modeling altruism and spitefulness in experiments. Review of Economic Dynamics, 1(3), 593-622
Marcus, D.K., Norris, A.L. (2016) Spite. u: Zeigler-Hill V., Marcus D.K. [ur.] The Dark Side of Personality, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Marcus, D.K., Zeigler-Hill, V., Mercer, S.H., Norris, A.L. (2014) The psychology of spite and the measurement of spitefulness. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 563-574
Offerman, T. (2002) Hurting hurts more than helping helps. European Economic Review, 46(8), 1423-1437
Orr, H.A. (2009) Fitness and its role in evolutionary genetics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10(8), 531-539
Paulhus, D.L., Williams, K.M. (2002) The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556-563
Pillutla, M.M., Murnighan, K.J. (1996) Unfairness, anger, and spite: Emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(3), 208-224
Rabin, M. (1993) Incorporating fairness into economics and game theory. American Economic Review, 83(5), 1281-1302
Ramseyer, J.M., Rasmusen, E.B. (2013) Are Americans more litigious?: Some quantitative evidence. u: Buckley F.H. [ur.] The American Illness: Essays on the Rule of Law. New Haven and London, New Haven - London: Yale University Press
Rot, N. (2010) Osnovi socijalne psihologije. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike
Roth, A.E., Prasnikar, V., Okuno-Fujiwara, M., Zamir, M.S. (1991) Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An experimental study. American Economic Review, 81(5), 1068-1095
Shabad, P. (2000) Giving the devil his due: Spite and the struggle for individual dignity. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 17(4), 690-705
Trebješanin, Ž. (2001) Rečnik psihologije. Beograd: Stubovi kulture
West, S.A., Griffin, A.S., Gardner, A. (2007) Social semantics: Altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20(2), 415-432
Wilson, E.O. (1975) Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press
Zamir, E., Teichman, D. (2008) Behavioral law and economics. New York: Oxford University Press
Žunić-Pavlović, V., Kovačević-Lepojević, M. (2011) Prevalencija i razvoj poremećaja ponašanja u detinjstvu. Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija, vol. 10, br. 4, str. 725-742
 

O članku

jezik rada: srpski
vrsta rada: pregledni članak
DOI: 10.5937/zrpfn0-25767
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 02.09.2020.
metod recenzije: dvostruko anoniman
Creative Commons License 4.0

Povezani članci