Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:[8]
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:4
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:3

Contents

article: 8 from 19  
Back back to result list
2014, vol. 42, iss. 1, pp. 127-147
Analysis of the sustainability reporting initiatives of electric utilities in Brazil
aUniversity of Campinas, Department of Energy, Campinas, Brazil + International Energy Initiative, Campinas, Brazil
bUniversity of Campinas, School of Applied Sciences, Campinas, Brazil

emailmariana@iei-la.org
Abstract
In an effort to attend to the growing concern about the social and environmental impact of organizational activities, several companies have begun to publish corporate sustainability reports. Brazilian power sector, following a worldwide trend, has the great majority of its companies using the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) framework as a model for sustainability reporting. A different model of Corporate Social Report is also required, by law, by the Brazilian National Agency of Electric Energy (ANEEL). In this context, the objective of this paper was to assess how Brazilian electricity utilities are using GRI guidelines and the effect of legislation on the content of this report. For this, an exploratory and comparative study was carried out on the sustainability reports of 12 electric utilities. The indicators used and the content of the 2010 reports were analyzed and compared, in order to verify the presence of a pattern in which the distributors use the guidelines and its indicators. The first findings show that the adopted sustainability concept, the adequacy to the GRI principles, the choice of indicators and the quality of the information reported are quite variable among different companies. The influence of ANEEL on the content of GRI report became quite clear. It is possible to conclude that GRI model is not, in a general way, well used by Brazilian electricity companies, showing there is much to be done to advance sustainability reporting in this sector, especially in relation to transparency and quality of the reports.
References
*** (2012) ISE – Índice Bovespa de Sustentabilidade. http://www.bmfbovespa.com.br/indices/ResumoIndice.aspx?Indice=ISE&Opcao=0&idioma=pt-br (2012-02-27)
*** (1980) World conservation strategy: Living resource conservation for sustainable development. Gland: International union for conservation of nature and natural resources
*** (2011) The millennium developement goals report. New York: UN, http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals (2011-08-15)
*** (2011) United Nations Global Compact. http://www.unglobalcompact.org (2011-08-12)
*** (2012) Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes. http://www.sustainability-indexes.com/ (2012-06-24)
ANEEL (2011) Manual de Elaboração do Relatório Anual de Responsabilidade Socioambiental das Empresas de Energia Elétrica. (2006), http://www.aneel.gov.br/aplicacoes/leitura_arquivo/default.cfm?idaplicacao=212 (2011-06-11)
Braga, C. (2011) Fatores determinantes do nível de divulgação ambiental no setor de energia elétrica no Brasil. Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting, 4(2): 230
Brown,, i dr. (2009) Building institutions based on information disclosure: lessons from GRI's sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(4): 571
Calixto, L. (2008) Responsabilidade Socioambiental: Pública ou Privada?. Revista Contabilidade Vista e Revista, 19(3): 123
Elkington, J. (1998) Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Stony Creek, CT: New Society Publishers
EPE – Empresa de Pesquisa Energética (2011) Balanço Energético Nacional 2011: Ano base 2010. Rio de Janeiro
Global Reporting Initiative (2006) Sustainability Reporting Guidelines: Version 3.0 GRI. Amsterdam
Grasbois, D. (2012) Corporate social responsibility reporting by the global hotel industry: Commitment, initiatives and performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31: 896
Gray, R. (2010) Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability… and how would we know?, An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35: 47-6
Guthrie, J., Farneti, F. (2008) GRI sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organizations. Public Money and Management, 28(6): 361
Hedberg, C., von Malmborg, F. (2003) The Global Reporting Initiative and corporate sustainability reporting in Swedish companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 10(3): 153-164
International Institute for Sustainable Development (1992) Business Strategies for Sustainable Development. Winnipeg, Canada: IISD
Juholin, E. (2004) For business or the good of all? A Finnish approach to corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance, 4(3): 20-31
Kolk, A. (2010) Trajectories of sustainability reporting by MNCs. Journal of World Business, 45(4): 367
Lamberton, G. (2005) Sustainability accounting-a brief history and conceptual framework. Accounting Forum, 29: 7-26
Lozano, R., Huisingh, D. (2011) Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19: 99-1
Marcondes, D. (2012) Relatórios de Insustentabilidade. http://www.cartacapital.com.br/carta-verde/relatorios-de-insustentabilidade/ (2012-04-04)
Moneva,, i dr. (2006) GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability. Accounting Forum, 30: 121
Pereira,, i dr. (2010) Rural electrification and energy poverty: Empirical evidences from Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(4): 122
Roca, L.C., Searcy, C. (2012) An analysis of indicators disclosed in corporate sustainability reports. Journal of Cleaner Production, 20: 103
Skouloudis,, i dr. (2010) Assessing non-financial reports according to the Global Reporting Initiative guidelines: evidence from Greece. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18: 426
Yongvanich, K., Guthrie, J. (2006) An extended performance reporting framework for social and environmental accounting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(5): 309-321
 

About

article language: English
document type: Original Scientific Paper
DOI: 10.5937/industrija42-5131
published in SCIndeks: 14/04/2014
peer review method: double-blind