Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:3
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:1

Contents

article: 2 from 44  
Back back to result list
2022, vol. 70, iss. 2, pp. 469-495
Desirability of regulative function of judicial power
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law

emailgorand@ius.bg.ac.rs
Keywords: Predictability; Equality; Judicial power; Regulative function; Precedent
Abstract
The article presents the follow-up to a previous article which expounds the thesis that in all developed legal systems court judgments can be sources of general rules and standards that will constraint the courts, as decisionmakers, and then, consequently, other legal subjects, even if they are not formally recognized as sources of law. In this article, the normative reasons in favor of performing the regulative function of the judiciary are first presented, with the most important ones being predictability and equ ality. It is then shown in which direction the regulative function could be performed by the judicial power of a typical continental system, if the judiciary, as a whole, accepts to perform it.
References
Alexander, L., Sherwin, E. (2001) The Rule of Rules: Morality, Rules, and the Dilemmas of Law. Durham-London: Duke University Press
Alexander, L., Sherwin, E. (2004) Judges as Rulemakers. University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper, Series 15
Bulygin, E. (2015) Essays in Legal Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Claus, L. (2005) Montesquieu's Mistakes and the True Meaning of Separation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 25(3): 419-451
Dajović, G. (2010) Rule of Recognition and Written Constitution. Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade: Belgrade Law Review, 58: 248-264
Dajović, G., Spaić, B. (2016) Pravo na obrazloženu presudu: Praksa Evropskog suda za ljudska prava / Right to a Reasoned Trial: Practice of The European Court of Human Rights. Podgorica: Centar za demokratsku tranziciju
Dajović, G. (2022) Mogućnost regulativne funkcije sudske vlasti. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, vol. 70, br. 1, str. 225-269
Duxbury, N. (2013) Elements of legislation. Cambridge: Cabridge University Press
Ervin, S.J. (1970) Separation of Powers: Judicial Independence. Law and Contemporary Problems, 35: 108-127
Feteris, E.T. (1999) Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation. Dordrecht: Springer Science
Green, L. (1990) The Authority of the State. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Hart, H. (1955) Are There Any Natural Rights?. Philosophical Review, 64(2): 175-191
Hart, H. (1982) Essays on Bentham. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Hart, H. (1994) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, Second Edition with Postscrip
Hart, H.L.A. (1958) Positivism and the separation of law and morals. Harvard Law Review, 71, 4/593-629
Hasnas, J. (2005) Hayek, the Common Law, and Fluid Drive. New York University Journal of Law & Liberty, 1: 79-110
Jovanović, M. (2020) Predgovor - O sudstvu kao vlasti. in: Jovanović Miodrag; Zdravković Ana [ed.] Sudstvo kao vlast, Beograd: Cepris, 7-8
Košutić, B.P. (1973) Sudska presuda kao izvor prava. Beograd: Savremena administracija
Kronman, A.T. (1990) Precedent and Tradition. Yale Law Journal, 99: 1029-1068
Kutz, C. (2001) The Judicial Community. Philosophical Issues, 11: 442-469
Lamond, G. (2005) Do Precedents Create Rules?. Legal Theory, 11: 1-26
Lee, T. (1999) Stare Decisis in Historical Perspective: From the Founding Era to the Rehnquist Court. Vanderbilt Law Review, 52: 647-735
Liebwald, D. (2013) Law's Capacity for Vagueness. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 26: 391-423
Lindquist, S.A., Cross, F.B. (2005) Empirically Testing Dworkin's Chain Novel Theory: Studying the Path of Precedent. New York University Law Review, 80: 1156-1206
Maccormick, N. (1994) Legal reasoning and legal theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Merrill, T.W. (1993) Judicial Opinions as Binding Law and as Explanations for Judgments. Cardozo Law Review, 15: 43-79
Perry, S.R. (1987) Judicial Obligation, Precedent and the Common Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 7: 215-257
Popović, D. (2008) Evropski sud za ljudska prava. Beograd: Službeni glasnik
Popović, D. (2021) Inconsistent adjudication: A violation of the right to fair trial under the European Convention on human rights. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, vol. 69, br. 2, str. 297-320
Postema, G. (1987) The Normativity of Law. in: Gavison Ruth [ed.] Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy: The Influence of H.L.A. Hart, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 81-104
Raz, J. (1979) The Authority of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Raz, J. (1986) Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Raz, J. (1999) Practical Reason and Norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Schauer, F. (2005) Rule-based decision-making in the development of legal institutions in political environments. Hague, http://www.icc-cpi.int/library/organs/otp/Schauer_presentation.pdf, poslednji pristup 29. novembar 2021
Schauer, F. (2012) Precedent. in: Marmor Andrei [ed.] The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law, New York-London: Routledge, 123-136
Sherwin, E. (1999) A Defense of Analogical Reasoning in Law. University of Chicago Law Review, 66: 1179-1197
Solan, L.M. (2016) Precedent in Statutory Interpretation. North Carolina Law Review, 94: 1165-1234
Spaić, B. (2018) The Authority of Precedents in Civil Law Systems. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, XXVII: 27-44
Sunstein, C. (1996) Legal reasoning and political conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Troper, M., Grzegorczyk, C. (1997) Precedent in France. in: MacCormick Neil; Neil Robert [ed.] Interpreting statutes: A comparative study, Aldershot: Ashgate -Dartmouth, 103-140
Waldron, J. (2007) Law. in: Jackson Frank; Smith Michael [ed.] The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy, New York: Oxford University Press, 182-208
Wendell, H.O.Jr. (1897) The Path of the Law. Harvard Law Review, 10: 457-478
Wendell, H.O. (1920) Collected Legal Papers. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Co
 

About

article language: Serbian
document type: Paper
DOI: 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22204A
received: 29/11/2021
accepted: 07/02/2022
published in SCIndeks: 01/07/2022
Creative Commons License 4.0

Related records

No related records