- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:11
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:8
|
|
|
2019, vol. 12, br. 2, str. 93-108
|
|
Modeli finansiranja poljoprivrednog savetodavstva - iskustva Evropske unije
Funding models for farm advisory services: The European Union experience
Sažetak
Koncept savremene i intenzivne poljoprivredne proizvodnje unapređenje konkurentnosti poljoprivrednih gazdinstava nameće kao jedan od imperativa. Stepen znanja i informisanosti poljoprivrednika jedan je od faktora koji ima presudan uticaj na rast njihove konkurentosti. Upravo zbog toga se u sistemu evropske poljoprivrede naglašava uloga i značaj poljoprivredne savetodavne službe, kao karike koja povezuje istraživački i institucionalni sektor sa poljoprivrednim proizvođačima. Značaj savetodavnog rada u savremenim uslovima opredelio je predmet istraživanja u ovom radu. Primenom istorijskog, deskriptivnog, kao i metoda analize i sinteze, analizirana je poljoprivredna savetodavna služba Evropske unije. Cilj istraživanja je da se analizom poljoprivrednog savetodavstva i načina njenog finansiranja utvrdi na koji način privatizacija i komercijalizacija utiču na kvalitet savetodavnih usluga. Na osnovu uočenih prednosti i ograničenja pojedinih modela finansiranja, u radu su date smernice za organizaciju poljoprivredne savetodavne službe u Republici Srbiji.
Abstract
The concept of modern-day and intensive agricultural production has imposed the improvement of competitiveness of agricultural households as one of the most significant issues. The level of knowledge and awareness of farmers is crucial for the growth of their competitiveness. This is the reason why the role and importance of farm advisory service, as a link connecting research and institutional sectors with farmers, has been underlined in the European agriculture system. The importance of advisory activities in contemporary circumstances has determined the research subject of this paper. The farm advisory service of the European Union has been analyzed using the historic, descriptive methods, as well as analysis and synthesis methods. The object of the research is to determine how privatization and commercialization influence the quality of advisory services by analyzing farm advisory services and their funding methods. Based on observed advantages and constraints of certain funding models, the paper has given guidelines for organization of the farm advisory service in the Republic of Serbia.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
  
|
Botha, N., Coutts, J., Roth, H. (2008) The Role of Agricultural Consultants in New Zealand in Environmental Extension. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 14(2): 125-138
|
|
|
Đurić, K., Prodanović, R., Jahić, M. (2017) Komparacija poljoprivrednog savetodavnog sistema Republike Srbije i Evropske unije. Evropsko zakonodavstvo, 60: 209-226
|
|
|
European Commission (2009) Report from the commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of the Farm Advisory System as defined in Article 12 and 13 of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009. Accessible at (11 Mart 2019): http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ
|
|
|
Kania, J., Vinohradnik, K., Tworzyk, A. (2014) Advisory services in agricultural system of knowledge and information in Poland. u: The 11th European IFSA Symposium, Berlin, Germany, Proceedings of, 123-133
|
|
|
Kelly, T., Brady, M., Bolger, P. (2013) Evolution of Advisory Services in Ireland. u: Knowledge Transfer Conference 2013 Future of Farm Advisory Services: Delivering Innovate Systems, Teagasc, Dublin, 16-18
|
|
|
Klerkx, L., Proctor, A. (2012) Beyond fragmentation and disconnect: Networks for knowledge sharing in the English land management advisory system. Land Use Policy, 30(1): 13-24
|
|
|
Labarthe, P., Moumouni, I. (2014) AKIS and advisory services in Belgium: Report for AKIS inventory (WP3) of the PRO AKIS project. Accessible at (13 Mart 2019): www.proakis.eu/publicationsandevents/pubs
|
|
|
Labarthe, P., Laurent, C. (2013) The Importance of the Back-office for Farm Advisory Services. EuroChoices, 12(1): 21-26
|
|
|
Laurent, C., Cerf, M., Labarthe, P. (2006) Agricultural Extension Services and Market Regulation: Learning from a Comparison of Six EU Countries. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 12(1): 5-16
|
|
2
|
Mcgehee, N.G. (2007) An Agritourism Systems Model: A Weberian Perspective. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 15(2): 111-124
|
|
|
Prager, K., Thomson, K. (2014) AKIS in the United Kingdom -an overview of Agricultural Knowledge Systems and farmer advisory services: Project Report for the EU project PRO AKIS. WP3, Accessible at (13 Mart 2019): http://www.proakis.eu/publicationsandevents/pubs
|
|
|
Prager, K., Labarthe, P., Caggiano, M., Lorenzo-Arribas, A. (2016) How does commercialisation impact on the provision of farm advisory services? Evidence from Belgium, Italy, Ireland and the UK. Land Use Policy, 52: 329-344
|
|
|
Prager, K., Creaney, R., Lorenzo-Arribas, A. (2017) Criteria for a system level evaluation of farm advisory services. Land Use Policy, 61: 86-98
|
|
|
Rivera, W.R. (2000) Confronting global market: Public sector agricultural extension reconsidered. Journal of Extension Systems, 16: 33-54
|
|
|
Sharma, N., Patterson, P.G. (1999) The impact of communication effectiveness and service quality on relationship commitment in consumer, professional services. Journal of Services Marketing, 13(2): 151-170
|
|
|
Sutherland, L.A., Madureira, L., Dirimanova, V., Bogusz, M., Kania, J., Vinohradnik, K., Creaney, R., Duckett, D., Koehnen, T., Knierim, A. (2017) New knowledge networks of small-scale farmers in Europe's periphery. Land Use Policy, 63: 428-439
|
|
|
Sutherland, L.A., Mills, J., Ingram, J., Burton, R.J.F., Dwyer, J., Blackstock, K. (2013) Considering the source: Commercialisation and trust in agri-environmental information and advisory services in England. Journal of Environmental Management, 118: 96-105
|
|
|
Swanson, B.E., Rajalahti, R. (2010) Strengthening agricultural extension and advisory system: Procedures for assessing, transforming and evaluating extension systems. Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper, World Bank, 45
|
|
|
|
|