Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:4
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:4

Contents

article: 2 from 2  
Back back to result list
2014, vol. 48, iss. 4, pp. 185-199
Labeling of genetically modified food and consumers' rights
University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Law
Keywords: genetically modified food; consumer; genetically modified food labeling regime; basic consumers' rights
Abstract
The legal regulation of genetically modified food directly affects consumers, since they are the ones who encounter genetically modified food on the shelves every day. At the beginning, authors indicate that there are huge differences between legal regulation of genetically modified food in the United States and in the European Union. These differences result in different labeling regimes in those two systems of genetically modified food regulation. Authors consider several factors from which depend efficiency of the labeling regime, and labels' influence on the actual realization of basic consumers' rights. Authors will analyze these factors in the paper, such as: label complexity, opting for positive or negative labeling regime, whether labeling regime is mandatory or voluntary, etc. In the conclusion authors give recommendations to the Serbian legislator, and propositions for changes in current domestic legal regulation, which would improve realization of basic consumers' rights in relation with genetically modified food.
References
*** (2014) Guidance for industry: Voluntary labeling indicating whether foods have or have not been developed using bioengineering. http://www.fda.gov/food/guidanceregulation/guidancedocumentsregulatoryinformation/labelingnutrition/ucm059098.htm, 11th October 2014
Carter, C., Guillaume, G. International approaches to the labeling of genetically modified foods. Davis: Agricultural Issues Center University of California, http://www.agmrc.org/media/cms/cartergruere_16D28F0207B6C.pdf, 24.10.2014
Federici, V. (2010) Genetically Modified Food and Informed Consumer Choice: Comparing U. S. and E. U. Labeling Laws. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 3, 515-516; 35
Lee, B., Lee, W. (2004) The effect of information overload on consumer choice quality in an on-line environment. Psychology and Marketing, 21(3): 159-183
Leibovitch, E. (2008) Food Safety Regulation in the European Union: Toward an Unavoidable Centralization of Regulatory Powers. Texas International Law Journal, 3, 434; 43
Mchughen, A. (2000) Pandora's picnic basket: The potential hazards of genetically modified foods. Oxford, itd: Oxford University Press
Mitchell, P. (2003) Europe angers US with strict GM labeling. Nature Biotechnology, 21(1): 6-6
Paarlberg, R. (2008) Starved for science: How biotechnology is being kept out of Africa. Cambridge, 23
Stanivuković, M. (2003) Ugovori sa potrošačima sa inostranim elementom. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, vol. 37, br. 3, str. 189-210
Sunstein, C.R. (2003) Beyond the Precautionary Principle. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151(3): 1003
Teisl, M., Caswell, J. (2003) Information policy and genetically modified food: Weighing the benefits and costs. in: Working Paper no. 2003-1, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Resource Economics, page 6, http://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1195&context=peri_workingpapers, 15.10.2014
Tubić, B. (2014) Načelo predostrožnosti u međunarodnom pravu životne sredine i međunarodnoj sudskoj praksi. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, vol. 48, br. 2, str. 367-384
United States Code Annotated Title 21, food and drugs
US Center for Science in the Public Interest (2012) Biotechnology project: Frequently-asked question. http://www.cspinet.org/biotech/faq.html, 11.09.2014
Vujisić, D., Mihajlović, B. (2014) Genetski modifikovana hrana - pravo potrošača na izbor i obaveštenost. Pravo i privreda, vol. 52, br. 7-9, str. 283-296
 

About

article language: English
document type: Original Scientific Paper
DOI: 10.5937/zrpfns48-7583
published in SCIndeks: 09/06/2015
peer review method: double-blind