Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:15
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:11

Sadržaj

članak: 3 od 219  
Back povratak na rezultate
2021, br. 2, str. 249-265
Značaj slučaja Urgenda za razvoj klimatskih parnica na području Evrope
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet

e-adresaljubomir.tintor@yahoo.com
Ključne reči: klimatske promene; klimatske parnice; slučaj Urgenda; ljudska prava; Evropska konvencija o ljudskim pravima
Sažetak
U članku se na sveobuhvatan način analizira slučaj Urgenda protiv Holandije kao prva uspešna klimatska parnica u Evropi. U članku se analizira na osnovu kojih argumenata su holandski sudovi utvrdili odgovornost države za povrede ljudskih prava prouzrokovane propustom države u sprovođenju politike suzbijanja klimatskih promena. Ukazuje se na značaj ovog slučaja ne samo za holandsko već i za međunarodno pravo. U drugom delu članka biće prikazano na koji način je slučaj Urgenda uticao na klimatske parnice koje su se počele pojavljivati pred nacionalnim sudovima širom Evrope. Kroz uporednu analizu slučajeva biće ukazano da postoji neujednačena sudska praksa u klimatskim parnicama. Biće sagledano kako je slučaj Urgenda imao uticaja na pokretanje klimatskih parnica i pred Evropskim sudom za ljudska prava.
Reference
Novododat članak: provera, normiranje i linkovanje referenci u toku.
Čučković, B. 2018. Zaštita životne sredine u međunarodnom pravu ljudskih prava. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu -Pravni fakultet i Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje
De Graaf, K J. & Janssen, H. J. 2015. The Urgenda Decision: Netherlands Liable for Role in Causing Dangerous Global Climate Change. Journal of Environmental Law, 27(3), pp. 517-527
Drenovak-Ivanović, M. 2020. Standing In Environmental Law After Urgenda, Juliana and COVID-19 Crises. EU and comparative law issues and challenges series (ECLIC), 4, pp. 3-20
Gupta, S. & Tirpak, A. D. 2007. Cambridge. Policies, Instruments and Co-operative Arrangements. In: Metz, B., Davidson, O.R., Bosch, P.R., Dave, R. & Meyer, L.A. (eds), Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 746-807
Mayer, B. 2019. The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation: Ruling of the Court of Appeal of The Hague (9 October 2018). Transnational Environmental Law, 8(1), pp. 167-192
Minnerop, P. 2019. Integrating the 'duty of care' under the European Convention on Human Rights and the science and law of climate change: the decision of The Hague Court of Appeal in the Urgenda case. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 37(2), pp. 149-179
Spier, J. 2020. The 'Strongest' Climate Ruling Yet': The Dutch Supreme Courts Urgenda Judgment. Netherlands International Law Review, 67, pp. 319-391
Stein, E. & Castermans, A.G. 2017. Case Comment -Urgenda v. The State of the Netherlands: The "Reflex Effect" -Climate Change, Human Rights, and the Expanding Definitions of the Duty of Care. McGill Journal of Sustainable Development Law, 13, pp. 303-324
Verschuuren, J. 2019.The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation: The Hague Court of Appeal upholds judgment requiring the Netherlands to further reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 28(1), pp. 94-98
Watts, N. et al. 2018. The 2018 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: shaping the health of nations for centuries to come. Lancet, 392(10163). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32594-7
Wegener, L. 2020. Can the Paris Agreement Help Climate Change Litigation and Vice Versa?. Transnational Environmental Law, 9(1), pp. 17-36
Clark, P., Liston, G. & Kalpouzos, I. 2020. Climate change and the European Court of Human Rights: The Portuguese Youth Case. Dostupno na: https://www.ejiltalk. org/climate-change-and-the-european-court-of-human-rights-the-portugueseyouth-case/, (4. 2. 2021)
Climate & Development Knowledge Network. 2012. FEATURE: Climate change litigation -a rising tide?. Dostupno na: https://cdkn.org/2012/05/postcard-from-londonrising-tide-of-climate-change-litigation/?loclang=en_gb, (7. 2. 2021)
Gossement, A. 2021. Affaire du siècle (climat -responsabilité de l'Etat): ce qu'il faut savoir avant de lire le jugement du tribunal administratif de Paris. Dostupno na: http:// www.arnaudgossement.com/archive/2021/01/31/affaire-du-siecle-ce-qu-il-fautsavoir-avant-de-lire-le-juge-6294397.html, (7. 2. 2021)
Heri, C. 2020. The ECtHR's Pending Climate Change Case: What's Ill-Treatment Got To Do With It?. Dostupno na: https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-ecthrs-pending-climatechange-case-whats-ill-treatment-got-to-do-with-it/, (4. 1. 2021)
IPCC. 2007. Summary for Policymakers. In: Metz, B, et al. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-22. Dostupno na: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ ar4-wg3-spm-1.pdf
Kusmer, A. 2020. Activists took the Irish govt to court over its national climate plan -and won. Dostupno na: https://www.pri.org/stories/2020-08-13/activists-took-irishgovt-court-over-its-national-climate-plan-and-won, (23. 1. 2021)
McLoughlin, J. 2019. Environmental Human Rights Litigation in Ireland. Oxford Human Rights Hub. Dostupno na: http://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/environmental-human-rightslitigation-in-ireland/, (26. 12. 2020)
Nollkaemper, A. & Burgers, L. 2020. A New Classic in Climate Change Litigation: The Dutch Supreme Court Decision in the Urgenda Case. Dostupno na: https://www. ejiltalk.org/a-new-classic-in-climate-change-litigation-the-dutch-supreme-courtdecision-in-the-urgenda-case/, (2. 2. 2021)
Spijkers, O. 2020. Public Interest Litigation Before Domestic Courts in The Netherlands on the Basis of International Law: Article 3:305a Dutch Civil Code. Dostupno na: https://www.ejiltalk.org/public-interest-litigation-before-domestic-courts-in-thenetherlands-on-the-basis-of-international-law-article-3305a-dutch-civil-code/, (1. 2. 2021)
Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol, in Decision 1/CMP.8, 'Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol pursuant to its Article 3, para. 9 (the Doha Amendment)' (8 Dec. 2012), UN Doc. FCCC/KP/CMP/2012/13/Add.1, Annex
European Convention on Human Rights, Council of Europe, 4 November 1950
Paris Agreement 2015. Signed at the 21st session of the Conference of the Parties (COP 21) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
 

O članku

jezik rada: srpski
vrsta rada: pregledni članak
DOI: 10.5937/spz65-31054
primljen: 25.02.2021.
revidiran: 06.04.2021.
prihvaćen: 30.06.2021.
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 14.08.2021.
metod recenzije: dvostruko anoniman
Creative Commons License 4.0

Povezani članci

Nema povezanih članaka