Irony, deception and theory of mind in people with intellectual disabilities and dual diagnoses

Đorđević, Mirjana; Glumbić, Nenad; Brojčin, Branislav

doi:10.2298/VSP180214142D

Akcije

dodaj u Moj izbor [0]

kako citirati ovaj članak
prikaži na oba jezika
podeli ovaj članak

Direktan link

Metrika

citati u SCIndeksu: [2]
citati u CrossRef-u:0
citati u Google Scholaru:[]
posete u poslednjih 30 dana:22
preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:6

Sadržaj

članak: 9 od 51

povratak na rezultate

Vojnosanitetski pregled

2020, vol. 77, br. 6, str. 620-630

Ironija, prevara i teorija uma kod osoba sa intelektualnom ometenošću i dualnim dijagnozama

Đorđević Mirjana

, Glumbić Nenad

, Brojčin Branislav

Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju, Srbija

e-adresa: nenadglumbic@gmail.com

Projekat:

Socijalna participacija osoba sa intelektualnom ometenošću (MPNTR - 179017)

Ključne reči: intelektualna ometenost; dijagnoze, dualne (psihijatrija); mentalni procesi; prevara; teorija uma; komorbiditet

Sažetak

Uvod/Cilj. Sposobnost razumevanja i produkcije ironije i prevare je retko izučavana u populaciji osoba sa intelektualnom ometenošću (IO) ili dualnim dijagnozama (DD). Sposobnost razumevanja ironije i prevare se dovodi u vezu sa mnogim kognitivnim veštinama, ali neki autori ističu da je upravo teorija uma jedan od najznačajnijih faktora za ovu sposobnost. Ovo istraživanje je sprovedeno radi utvrđivanja lingvističke sposobnosti razumevanja i produkcije ironije i prevare odraslih osoba sa IO i DD, kao i utvrđivanja odnosa između ovih sposobnosti i teorije uma. Metode. Uzorak je činilo 120 osoba sa IO starosne dobi između 20 i 56 godina. Polovinu uzorka činile su osobe sa DD. Za procenu ispitanikovih sposobnosti produkcije i razumevanja ironije i prevare korišćene su četiri supskale iz Baterije za procenu komunikacije. Za procenu teorije uma korišćeni su zadaci lažnog verovanja iz kategorije "izgled-realnost". Nivo intelektualnog funkcionisanja proveravan je Ravenovim progresivnim matricama, dok je sposobnost razumevanja govora procenjivana Peabody Picture Vocabulary testom. Rezultati. Rezultati pokazuju da ispitanici sa IO i DD bolje razumeju i produkuju lažne nego ironične iskaze. Ispitanici sa IO su uspešniji u zadacima produkovanja, nego u zadacima razumevanja, kako lažnih, tako i ironičnih iskaza, dok za ispitanike sa DD ovo važi samo za ironične tvrdnje. U zadacima razumevanja ironije, ispitanici sa IO su bili značajno uspešniji od ispitanika sa DD. Kod ispitanika sa IO teorija uma prvog reda ostvarila je značajne korelacije samo sa sposobnošću produkcije ironije, a teorija uma drugog reda sa produkcijom ironije i produkcijom prevare. U grupi ispitanika sa DD nisu ustanovljene značajne korelacije između teorije uma i produkcije i razumevanja ironije i prevare. Zaključak. Između dve grupe ispitanika pronađene su razlike u nekim aspektima ispitivanih sposobnosti, ali ipak dominiraju sličnosti u profilu ovih sposobosti. Varijabilnost rezultata više objašnjava razlike u sposobnosti razumevanja govora, nego razlike u neverbalnom intelektualnom funkcionisanju ili usvojenosti teorije uma. Narednim istraživanjima trebalo bi proveriti uticaj drugih kognitivnih faktora.

Abstract

Background/Aim. The ability to comprehend and produce irony and deception is rarely explored in people with intellectual disability (ID) or dual diagnoses (DD). The ability to understand irony and deception appears to be related to many cognitive skills, but some authors point out that the theory of mind is one of the most important factors for this ability. This research was conducted to determine the linguistic aspects of production and comprehension of irony and deception in adults with ID and DD, as well as the relationship of these abilities with theory of mind. Methods. The sample consisted of 120 people with ID aged between 20 and 56. Half of the sample comprised people with DD. Four subscales from the Assessment Battery for Communication were used to assess the participants' abilities to produce and comprehend irony and deception. False-belief tasks from "appearance-reality" category were used in theory of mind assessment. The level of intellectual functioning was measured by the Raven's progressive matrices, while the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test was used to assess speech comprehension ability. Results. The results show that participants with DD and ID comprehend and produce false statements better than ironic ones. Participants with ID were more successful in production than in comprehension tasks of both false and ironic statements, while the same was true for participants with DD only for ironic statements. Participants with ID were significantly more successful than participants with DD in irony comprehension tasks. In participants with ID, first-order theory of mind significantly correlated only with the ability to produce irony, and second-order theory of mind significantly correlated with producing irony and deception. There were no significant correlations between theory of mind and producing and comprehending irony and deception in participants with DD. Conclusion. Although differences in some aspects of assessed abilities were found between the two groups of participants, the similarities in the profile of these abilities were dominant. Results of variability can be explained by differences in speech comprehension ability more than by differences in nonverbal intellectual functioning or theory of mind acquisition. Future studies should assess the influence of other cognitive factors.

	Reference
	Airenti, G., Bara, B.G., Colombetti, M. (1993) Conversation and Behavior Games in the Pragmatics of Dialogue. Cognitive Science, 17(2): 197-256
1	American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD) (2010) Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of supports. Washington, DC, 11th ed
1	American Psychiatric Association (2013) The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-5. Arlington VA, 5th ed
	Angeleri, R., Airenti, G. (2014) The development of joke and irony understanding: A study with 3-to 6-year-old children. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 68(2): 133-146
	Angell, M.E., Bailey, R.L., Larson, L. (2008) Systematic instruction for social-pragmatic language skills in lunchroom settings. Educ Train Dev Disabil, 43(3): 342-59
	Bakken, T.L., Friis, S.V., Lovoll, S.V., Smeby, N.A., Martinsen, H. (2007) Behavioral disorganization as an indicator of psychosis in adults with intellectual disability and autism. Ment Health Aspect Dev Disabil, 10(2): 37-47
	Bakken, T.L., Eilertsen, D.E., Smeby, N.A., Martinsen, H. (2008) Effective Communication Related to Psychotic Disorganised Behaviour in Adults with Intellectual Disability and Autism. Nordic Journal of Nursing Research, 28(2): 9-13
	Bara, B. (2011) Cognitive pragmatics: The mental processes of communication. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(3): 443-85
	Bara, B.G., Bosco, F.M., Bucciarelli, M. (1999) Developmental Pragmatics in Normal and Abnormal Children. Brain and Language, 68(3): 507-528
1	Baron-Cohen, S. (2000) Theory of mind and autism: A fifteen year review. u: Baron-Cohen S., Tager-Flusberg H., Cohen D.J. [ur.] Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3-20
	Bell, E.M., Langdon, R., Siegert, R.J., Ellis, P.E. (2010) Schizophrenia and social functioning: The role of impaired metacognition. u: Dimaggio G., Lysaker P. [ur.] Metacognition and severe adult mental disorders: From research to treatment, London, UK: Routledge, 121-166
2	Bora, E., Yucel, M., Pantelis, C. (2009) Theory of mind impairment in schizophrenia: Meta-analysis. Schizophrenia Research, 109(1-3): 1-9
	Bosco, F.M., Gabbatore, I., Angeleri, R., Zettin, M., Parola, A. (2018) Do executive function and theory of mind predict pragmatic abilities following traumatic brain injury? An analysis of sincere, deceitful and ironic communicative acts. Journal of Communication Disorders, 75: 102-117
	Bosco, F.M., Vallana, M., Bucciarelli, M. (2009) Comprehension of communicative intentions: The case of figurative language. J Cogn Sci, 10(2): 245-77
	Bosco, F.M., Angeleri, R., Colle, L., Sacco, K., Bara, B.G. (2013) Communicative abilities in children: An assessment through different phenomena and expressive means. Journal of Child Language, 40(4): 741-778
	Bosco, F.M., Angeleri, R., Sacco, K., Bara, B.G. (2015) Explaining pragmatic performance in traumatic brain injury: A process perspective on communicative errors. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 50(1): 63-83
	Bosco, F.M., Bucciarelli, M. (2008) Simple and complex deceits and ironies. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(4): 583-607
	Bosco, F.M., Bono, A., Bara, B.G. (2012) Recognition and repair of communicative failures: The interaction between Theory of Mind and cognitive complexity in schizophrenic patients. Journal of Communication Disorders, 45(3): 181-197
	Bosco, F.M., Gabbatore, I. (2017) Theory of mind in recognizing and recovering communicative failures. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(1): 57-88
	Bosco, F.M., Parola, A., Valentini, M.C., Morese, R. (2017) Neural correlates underlying the comprehension of deceitful and ironic communicative intentions. Cortex, 94: 73-86
2	Brüne, M. (2005) 'Theory of mind' in schizophrenia: A review of the literature. Schizophrenia bulletin, 31(1): 21-42
	Caillies, S., Hody, A., Calmus, A. (2012) Theory of mind and irony comprehension in children with cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(5): 1380-1388
	Caillies, S., Bertot, V., Motte, J., Raynaud, C., Abely, M. (2014) Social cognition in ADHD: Irony understanding and recursive theory of mind. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(11): 3191-3198
1	Charman, T., Campbell, A., Edwards, L.S. (1998) Theory of mind performance in children, adolescents, and adults with a mental handicap. Cognitive Development, 13(3): 307-322
	Cherry, K.E., Penn, D., Matson, J.L., Bamburg, J.W. (2000) Characteristics of Schizophrenia Among Persons with Severe or Profound Mental Retardation. Psychiatric Services, 51(7): 922-924
	Colle, L., Angeleri, R., Vallana, M., Sacco, K., Bara, B.G., Bosco, F.M. (2013) Understanding the communicative impairments in schizophrenia: A preliminary study. Journal of Communication Disorders, 46(3): 294-308
	Cooper, S.A., Smiley, E., Morrison, J., Williamson, A., Allan, L. (2007) Mental ill-health in adults with intellectual disabilities: Prevalence and associated factors. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(1): 27-35
1	Corcoran, R., Mercer, G., Frith, C.D. (1995) Schizophrenia, symptomatology and social inference: Investigating 'theory of mind' in people with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 17(1): 5-13
	Cormack, K.F.M., Brown, A.C., Hastings, R.P. (2000) Behavioural and emotional difficulties in students attending schools for children and adolescents with severe intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 44(2): 124-129
	Dekker, M.C., Koot, H.M. (2003) DSM-IV Disorders in Children with Borderline to Moderate Intellectual Disability: Prevalence and Impact. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, I, 42(8): 915-922
	Dennis, M., Purvis, K., Barnes, M.A., Wilkinson, M., Winner, E. (2001) Understanding of Literal Truth, Ironic Criticism, and Deceptive Praise Following Childhood Head Injury. Brain and Language, 78(1): 1-16
	Dunn, L.M., Dunn, D.M. (2007) PPVT-4: Peabody picture vocabulary test. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments, 4 th ed
	Einfeld, S.L., Tonge, B.J. (1996) Population prevalence of psychopathology in children and adolescents with intellectual disability: Rationale and methods. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, I, 40(2): 91-98
2	Einfeld, S.L., Ellis, L.A., Emerson, E. (2011) Comorbidity of intellectual disability and mental disorder in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 36(2): 137-143
5	Emerson, E. (2003) Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents with and without intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47(1): 51-58
	Farrar, J.M., Maag, L. (2002) Early language development and the emergence of a theory of mind. First Language, 22(2): 197-213
	Filippova, E., Astington, J.W. (2008) Further Development in Social Reasoning Revealed in Discourse Irony Understanding. Child Development, 79(1): 126-138
	Fisher, N., Happe, F., Dunn, J. (2005) The relationship between vocabulary, grammar, and false belief task performance in children with autistic spectrum disorders and children with moderate learning difficulties. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(4): 409-419
2	Giaouri, S., Alevriadou, A., Tsakiridou, E. (2010) Theory of mind abilities in children with Down syndrome and non-specific intellectual disabilities: An empirical study with some educational implications. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2): 3883-3887
	Glumbić, N.P. (2005) Quality of social participation of children suffering from moderate mental retardation. Socijalna misao, vol. 12, br. 2-3, str. 143-154
	Godbee, K., Porter, M. (2013) Comprehension of sarcasm, metaphor and simile in Williams syndrome. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48(6): 651-665
	Hancock, J.T. (2004) Verbal Irony Use in Face-To-Face and Computer-Mediated Conversations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(4): 447-463
	Hancock, J.T., Dunham, P.J., Purdy, K. (2000) Children's Comprehension of Critical and Complimentary Forms of Verbal Irony. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1(2): 227-248
	Hansen, M.B., Markman, E.M. (2005) Appearance questions can be misleading: A discourse-based account of the appearance-reality problem. Cognitive Psychology, 50(3): 233-263
1	Happé, F.G. (1993) Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48(2): 101-119
	Horovitz, M., Matson, J.L., Sipes, M., Shoemaker, M., Belva, B., Bamburg, J.W. (2011) Incidence and trends in psychopathology symptoms over time in adults with severe to profound intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(2): 685-692
	Ibáñez, G.J.M., Ristol, G.J.E. (2011) Theory of mind and language comprehension in schizophrenia: Poor mindreading affects figurative language comprehension beyond intelligence deficits. J Neurolinguistics, 24(1): 54-69
1	Kravetz, S., Katz, S., Alfa-Roller, I., Yehoshua, S. (2003) Aspects of a theory of mind and self-reports of quality of life by persons with mental retardation. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 15(2): 165-183
	Kreuz, R.J. (2000) The Production and Processing of Verbal Irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1): 99-107
1	Lo, S.T., Siemensma, E., Collin, P., Hokken-Koelega, A. (2013) Impaired theory of mind and symptoms of Autism Spectrum Disorder in children with Prader-Willi syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(9): 2764-2773
	Lovullo, S.V., Matson, J.L. (2009) Comorbid psychopathology in adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders and intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30(6): 1288-1296
	Massaro, D., Valle, A., Marchetti, A. (2013) Irony and second-order false belief in children: What changes when mothers rather than siblings speak?. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10(3): 301-317
	Matson, J.L., Terlonge, C., Gonzalez, M., Rivet, T. (2006) An evaluation of social and adaptive skills in adults with bipolar disorder and severe/profound intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27(6): 681-687
	Matson, J.L., Anderson, S.J., Bamburg, J.W. (2000) The Relationship of Social Skills to Psychopathology for Individuals with Mild and Moderate Mental Retardation. British Journal of Development Disabilities, 46(90): 15-22
	Milosky, L.M., Ford, J.A. (1997) The role of prosody in children's inferences of ironic intent. Discourse Processes, 23(1): 47-61
	Mitchley, N.J., Barber, J., Gray, J.M., Brooks, N.D., Livingston, M.G. (1998) Comprehension of irony in Schizophrenia. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 3(2): 127-138
1	Mo, S., Su, Y., Chan, R.C.K., Liu, J. (2008) Comprehension of metaphor and irony in schizophrenia during remission: The role of theory of mind and IQ. Psychiatry Research, 157(1-3): 21-29
	Molteno, G., Molteno, C.D., Finchilescu, G., Dawes, A.R.L. (2001) Behavioural and emotional problems in children with intellectual disability attending special schools in Cape Town, South Africa. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45(6): 515-520
	Monetta, L., Grindrod, C.M., Pell, M.D. (2009) Irony comprehension and theory of mind deficits in patients with Parkinson's disease. Cortex, 45(8): 972-981
	Norbury, C.F. (2005) The relationship between theory of mind and metaphor: Evidence from children with language impairment and autistic spectrum disorder. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23(3): 383-399
1	Raven, J., Raven, J.C., Court, J.H. (1998) Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press
	Recchia, H.E., Howe, N., Ross, H.S., Alexander, S. (2010) Children's understanding and production of verbal irony in family conversations. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28(2): 255-274
	Sacco, K., Angeleri, R., Bosco, F.M., Colle, L., Mate, D., Bara, B.G. (2008) Assessment Battery for Communication - ABaCo: A new instrument for the evaluation of pragmatic abilities. J Cogn Sci, 9(2): 111-57
	Sperber, D., Wilson, D. (2002) Pragmatics, Modularity and Mind-reading. Mind & Language, 17(1-2): 3-23
	Sprong, M., Schothorst, P., Vos, E., Hox, J., van Engeland, H. (2007) Theory of mind in schizophrenia: Meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 191(1): 5-13
1	Sullivan, K., Winner, E., Tager-Flusberg, H. (2003) Can Adolescents with Williams Syndrome Tell the Difference Between Lies and Jokes?. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23(1-2): 85-103
	Vance, M., Wells, B. (1994) The wrong end of the stick: Language-impaired children's understanding of non-literal language. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 10(1): 23-46
	Wang, A., Lee, S.S., Sigman, M., Dapretto, M. (2006) Neural basis of irony comprehension in children with autism: The role of prosody and context. Brain, 129(4): 932-943
	Zhou, L., Burgoon, J.K., Zhang, D., Nunamaker, J.F. (2004) Language dominance in interpersonal deception in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(3): 381-402

O članku

jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: izvorni naučni članak
DOI: 10.2298/VSP180214142D
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 14.07.2020.
metod recenzije: dvostruko anoniman

Povezani članci

Nema povezanih članaka