Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:20
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:13

Contents

article: 1 from 19  
Back back to result list
2021, vol. 3, iss. 1, pp. 147-164
The role of ex aequo et bono in ICSID arbitration
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law

emailmarko.jovanovic@ius.bg.ac.rs
Keywords: investment arbitration; ICSID Centre; applicable law; ex aequo et bono; annulment
Abstract
This article examines the role of the principle of ex aequo et bono in arbitration before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). At the outset, the author remarks that the cases in which the application of ex aequo et bono was agreed upon by the parties are very scarce. Nevertheless, despite that scarcity, it is possible to draw some conclusions on the way in which equity was invoked by the parties and applied by the ICSID tribunals. Two scenarios are analyzed in particular: the use of ex aequo et bono as the applicable framework for dispute settlement and the reliance on ex aequo et bono in an attempt to nullify the award before an ad hoc Committee. The author concludes that the reluctance of the parties to agree on ex aequo et bono may be explained by the lack of predictability of outcomes that is inherent to this source of law. On the contrary, it might be expected that the parties will continue trying to come up with creative arguments aimed at proving the unauthorized application of ex aequo et bono by the tribunals in their attempts to annul the awards on the basis of excess of powers.
References
Amerasinghe, C.F. (1974) Submissions to the Jurisdiction of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, No. 2
Bonnan, R. (2015) Different Conceptions of Amiable Composition in International Commercial Arbitration: A Comparison in Space and Time. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, No. 3
Broggini, G. (1991) Réflexions sur l'Équité dans l'arbitrage international. ASA Bulletin, No. 2
Lazić, M., Palermo, G., Dragićević, S. (2020) Ex Aequo et Bono in International Arbitration / Ex aequo et bono u međunarodnoj arbitraži. Revija Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava, vol. 2, br. 1, str. 47-66
Mustill, M. (1989) Contemporary Problems in International Commercial Arbitration: A Response. International Business Lawyer, No. 4
Park, W. (2014) The Predictability Paradox Arbitrators and Applicable Law. in: Bortolotti Fabio, Mayer Pierre [ed.] The Application of Substantive Law by International Arbitrators, Kluwer Law International
Peter, W. (1995) Arbitration Under International Investment Agreements. Kluwer Law International
Schreuer, C. (1996) Decisions Ex Aequo et Bono Under the ICSID Convention. ICSID Review: Foreign Investment Law Journal, 11(1): 37-63
Schreuer, C.H., Malintoppi, L., Reinisch, A., Sinclair, A. (2009) The ICSID Convention: A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2 nd edition
Teramura, N. (2020) Ex Aequo et Bono as a Response to the 'Over-Judicalisation' of International Commercial Arbitration. Kluwer Law International
Wälde, T., Sabahi, B. (2008) Compensation, Damages and Valuation. in: Muchlinski Peter, Ortino Federico, Schreuer Christoph [ed.] The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Yu, H.L. (2000) Amiable Composition: A Learning Curve. Journal of International Arbitration, (1)
 

About

article language: English
document type: Original Scientific Paper
DOI: 10.5937/RKSPP2101147J
received: 04/05/2021
accepted: 18/05/2021
published in SCIndeks: 12/06/2021

Related records