- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:18
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:11
|
|
2022, vol. 3, br. 1, str. 61-74
|
Razvoj klimatske diplomatije i njen značaj za savremene države
Development of climate diplomacy and its significance for modern state
Sažetak
Klimatske promene su jedan od najvećih izazova s kojim se suočavaju moderne države i celo čovečanstvo. One imaju veliki uticaj na gotovo sve spoljnopolitičke izazove u HHI veku. Naučnici i stručnjaci postigli su saglasnost o njihovom značaju. Međutim, nedostaju politička saglasnost i formulisanje efikasnog političkog odgovora. Budući da se dešavaju globalno, politički odgovor na njih mora biti međunarodni, regionalni i lokalni. Da bi se efikasno odgovorilo na klimatske promene, one se moraju valjano razumeti, adekvatno analizirati i države moraju imati kapacitete da se u spoljnoj politici uspešno izbore s tim izazovom. Drugim rečima, države moraju da izgrade unutrašnje kapacitete za uspešno vođenje klimatske diplomatije, koja je od pojave ovog izazova u međunarodnoj agendi, početkom devedesetih godina prošlog veka, postala glavno spoljnopolitičko sredstvo u izgradnji međunarodnog klimatskog režima. Od prvog globalnog UN Samita u Riju (1992) do poslednjeg u Glazgovu (2021) klimatski režim je nastajao brže ili sporije u zavisnosti od većih ili manjih uspeha klimatske diplomatije. Danas, kada su posledice klimatskih promena sve uočljivije, a građani sve glasniji, države više ne mogu sebi da dozvole amaterizam u toj oblasti spoljnopolitičke aktivnosti. Izmenjeni koncept međunarodnih odnosa koji je doneo i izmenjen koncept bezbednosti ima širi pogled od isključive orijentacije na državu. Sve ovo uključuje i države Jugoistočne Evrope koje uspešnom klimatskom diplomatijom mogu dati stvarni međunarodni doprinos, ali i poboljšati međusobnu regionalnu saradnju i unaprediti svoj ekonomski razvoj.
Abstract
Climate change is one of the greatest challenges encountered by modern states and humanity on the whole. It has a huge impact on almost all foreign policy challenges in the 21st century. Scientists and experts have reached agreement about its significance. However, there is no political consent and formulation of an efficient political response. Since climate change occurs globally, the political response to it must be international, regional and local. In order to respond efficiently to climate change, it needs to be properly understood and adequately analyzed, and states must have the capacity to successfully deal with that challenge in their respective foreign policies. In other words, states must build internal capacities for successful conduct of climate diplomacy that, since the emergence of this challenge on the international agenda, at the beginning of the 1990sm has become the main foreign policy instrument in the development of the international climate regime. From the first global UN Summit in Rio (1992) to the most recent one in Glasgow (2021), the climate regime was developed more or less rapidly, depending on the major or minor successes of climate diplomacy. Nowadays, with the consequences of climate change being more evident and with citizens raising their voice, states cannot allow themselves to be amateurs in that area of foreign policy activity. The modified concept of international relations that has also brought along the modified concept of security has a broader view than the exclusive orientation to the state. All this also includes the countries of Southeast Europe which are able to make an actual contribution through successful climate diplomacy, as well as improve mutual regional cooperation and strengthen their economic development.
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
*** (2019) Berlin Climate and Security Conference Summary. Berlin: German Federal Foreign Office
|
|
Adriazola, P., Carius, A., Griestop, L., Ruthner, L., Tanzler, D., Thwaites, J., Wolters, S. (2014) New Paths for Climate Diplomacy. Berlin: Federal Foreign Office
|
|
Amanatidis, G., Urbina, T.G. (2018) Climate Diplomacy. Brussels: European Parliament
|
|
Boesche, R. (2002) The First Great Political Realist: Kautilya and His Arthashastra. Lanham: Lexington Books
|
|
Bojić, A. (2010) Energy Security of European Union. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka, [In Serbian]
|
|
Buzan, B., et al. (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers
|
2
|
Cvetković, V.M., Vučić, S.Z., Gačić, J. (2015) Climate change and national defense. Vojno delo, vol. 67, br. 5, str. 181-203
|
|
Federal Foreign Office (2019) Climate Diplomacy Report. Berlin
|
|
Group of authors (2020) 21. Century Diplomacy, Foreign Policy is Climate Policy. Berlin: Wilson Center
|
|
Hofmeister, W., Rueppel, P. (2014) Climate Change Diplomacy: The Way Forward for Asia and Europe. Brussels: Konrad-Adenauer Stiftung Ltd
|
|
Kegley, C.W. (2004) World politics: Trend and transformation / Svetska politika - trend i transformacija. Beograd: Centar za studije Jugoistočne Evrope, [In Serbian]
|
|
Mearsheimer, J.J. (2010) The Tragedy of the Politics of Great Powers. Beograd: Udruženje za studije SAD u Srbiji, [In Serbian]
|
|
Nadić, D. (2012) Experiments in Political Ecology. Beograd: Čigoja štampa, [In Serbian]
|
|
Nye, J. (1988) Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World Politics, 40(2): 235-251
|
3
|
Nye, J. (2004) Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs
|
|
Nye, J. (2006) Understanding International Conflicts. Beograd: Stubovi kulture, [In Serbian]
|
|
Purvis, N., Belenky, M., Lefton, R., Langley, C. (2016) Climate Diplomacy after Paris: Opportunities for U.S. leadership. Washington, DC: Climate Advisers
|
|
Sekulić, G., Dimović, D., Kalmar, Z., Todorović, N. (2012) Climate Change Resilient: Serbia. Beograd: WWF, [In Serbian]
|
|
Seyom, B. (1996) International Relations in a Changing Global System, Toward a Theory of the World Polity. New York: Westview Press
|
|
Simić, R.D. (2007) Modern Security Theories. Beograd: Centar za međunarodne i bezbednosne poslove, [In Serbian]
|
|
Simić, R.D. (2002) Security Science. Službeni list, Beograd, [In Serbian]
|
|
Vukadinović, R. (2005) Theory of International Politics. Zagreb: Politička kultura, [In Croatian]
|
|
Wang, H. (2020) 'Climate Superpowers?' Why the Cold War is the wrong analogy for our heating Planet. u: Carius A., Gordon N., Risi L. [ur.] 21st Century Diplomacy, Foreign Policy is Climate Policy, Berlin: Wilson Center, 6-9
|
|
|
|