- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:1
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:0
|
|
|
2015, br. 4, str. 193-204
|
|
Tehnologija u službi prava - primer tehničkih mera zaštite autorskih prava u Evropskoj uniji
Technology in the service of law: Example of technological protection measures in the European Union's copyright law
Megatrend Univerzitet, Fakultet za pravo, javnu upravu i bezbednost - FDUA, Beograd, Srbija
e-adresa: urke2626@yahoo.fr
Sažetak
U savremenom informacionom društvu, brojni su primeri kršenja autorskih prava uz pomoć različitih tehnoloških sredstava. Ova pojava je raširena u toj meri da u pojedinim evropskim državama piraterija i tzv. koncept 'slobodnog softvera' figurišu u programima nekih političkih partija koje učestvuju na izborima. Međutim, cilj ovog rada je upravo obratan: namera je da se pokaže da tehnologija takođe može biti u službi prava, tim pre imajući u vidu da je stvaranje Evropske (zajednice) unije, sui generis međunarodne organizacije, pre svega zbog postojanja različitih vidova slobode kretanja na zajedničkom/unutrašnjem tržištu, dodatno pojačalo potrebu iznalaženja zajedničkog evropskog koncepta zaštite autorskih prava. Najbitniji akt usvojen u ovoj oblasti je Direktiva 2001/29 Evropskog parlamenta i Saveta o usklađivanju određenih aspekata autorskih i srodnih prava u informacionom društvu. Namera ovog članka je da predstavi i analizira prednosti i slabosti sistema zaštite autorskih prava putem tehničkih mera predviđenih u ovom aktu.
Abstract
In the information society, examples of copyright violation by the unlawful use of technology are so numerous, that in some European countries piracy issues and the concept of free software have become an integral part of official programs of certain political parties taking part in elections. The objective of this paper is just the opposite: to demonstrate that technology can also be in the service of law, especially since the development of the European Union law greatly accentuated - mainly because of the freedoms of movement in the Internal Market - the need for a European response to the challenges of copyright protection. The most important act the EU adopted in this field is the Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonization of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, while the national legislation in the Member States, as well as the legal doctrine, often have divergent approaches. Based on a jurisprudential analysis and focused literature review, this paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of the EU law harmonization related to the technological protection measures.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
|
*** CCCCoE's explanatory report to the convention on cybercrime. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Reports/Html/185.htm, 22.06.2015
|
|
|
*** (2001) Official Journal of the European Communities, of 22 June 2001, L 167, 10-19, hereinafter referred to as Directive
|
|
|
*** (2009) Communication of the Commission of 19 October 2009. COM 532 final, http://ec.europa. eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/copyright-infso/20091019_532_en.pdf, 21.06.2015
|
|
|
*** Consolidated version of the Treaty Establishing the European Community. Official Journal of the European Communities, C 325, 33-184
|
|
|
*** The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works was signed on September 9, 1886
|
|
|
Dirrig, E. Limites tenant à la nature des directives et cohérence de l'ordre juridique communautaire: Un noeud gordien?. Revue trimestrielle de droit européen, commentaire de l'arrêt de la CJCE du 3 mars 2005 Procédure pénale c/ Silvio Berlusconi (aff. jt. C-387/02, C-391/02, C-403/02) 4-2005, 921-957
|
|
|
European Commission Press release database. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-01-528_en.htm, 09.07.2015
|
|
|
Gavison, R. (1999) Privacy and the Limits of Law. Harvard University Press, 327
|
|
|
Herubel, M., Tarrier, F. (2003) Mesures techniques de protection des oeuvres et DRMS. Ministère français de culture et de communication, première partie: un état des lieux, janvier, Rapport n° 2003-02-(I) du, étude établie par Philippe Chantepie, Chargé de mission à l'Inspection Générale de l'Administration des Affaires Culturelles, 47
|
|
|
Hua, J.J. (2014) Toward a More Balanced Approach: Rethinking and Readjusting Copyright Systems in the Digital Network Era. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg
|
|
4
|
Lisbon European Council Presidency conclusions. points 8-11, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm, 29.06.2015
|
|
|
Maillard, T. (2004) La réception des mesures techniques de protection des oeuvres en droit français: Commentaire du projet de loi relatif au droit d'auteur et aux droits voisins dans la société de l'information. Légipresse, n°208, II, 8-15
|
|
|
Mazziotti, G. (2008) EU Digital Copyright Law and the End-User. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg
|
|
|
Soufron, J.B. (2002) Les limites de la protection technique des données numériques: La directive 2001/29/CE du Parlement Européen et du Conseil du 22 mai 2001 sur l'harmonisation de certains aspects du droit d'auteur dans la société de l'information. University of Strasbourg, 1
|
|
|
Vivant, M., Maffre-Baugé, A. (2002) Internet et propriété intellectuelle: Le droit, l'information et les réseaux. Paris: Institut français des relations internationales, 51-58
|
|
|
|
|