- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:8
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:2
|
|
|
2019, vol. 58, br. 84, str. 281-306
|
|
Pravo na brisanje podataka o ličnosti dostupnih na internetu
The right to erasure of personal data available on the internet
Sažetak
U radu je prikazano pravo na brisanje podataka o ličnosti, koje će, u svom redefinisanom obliku, predstavljati jednu od novina Zakona o zaštiti podataka o ličnosti Republike Srbije iz 2018. godine. Po uzoru na Opštu uredbu o zaštiti podataka o ličnosti Evropske unije, Zakon o zaštiti podataka o ličnosti Republike Srbije nastoji da prilagodi sadržinu prava na brisanjeokolnostima široke dostupnosti ličnih podataka na globalnoj računarskoj mreži - internetu. Cilj rada je da se naučnoj i stručnoj javnosti približi ovo pravo imajući u vidu da njegova formulacija otvara brojna pitanja. U tu svrhu, najpre su predstavljene okolnosti koje su uslovile redefinisanje prava na brisanje. Zatim su konkretizovani sadržina i način njegove realizacije prema praksi Suda pravde Evropske unije sa ključnim argumentima pro et contra. Ukazano je na nepostojanje podudarnosti između sadržine prava na brisanje prema praksi Suda pravde Evropske unije, s jedne, i Opšte uredbe o zaštiti podataka o ličnosti Evropske unije, s druge strane. Na kraju su analizirani razlozi koji, prema važećim rešenjima prava Evropske unije i domaćeg prava, treba da dovedu do usvajanja zahteva za brisanje podataka o ličnosti, kao i izuzeci od prava na brisanje.
Abstract
The paper examines the right to erasure of personal data ("the right to be forgotten"), as a specific reflection of the right to privacy in the era of information technology. In line with the solutions of the General Data Protection Regulation of the European Union (GDPR), Serbia enacted the Act on the Protection of Personal Data of the Republic of Serbia (2018), which endevours to adapt the content of the right to erasure of data to the circumstances of wide availability of personal data on the global worldwide network - the Internet.The paper aims to present the right to erasure to the domestic scientific and professional audiences, bearing in mind that its wording leaves room for diverging interpretations. The author first briefly outlines the circumstances which have led to introducing the right to erasure of data. The content and the manner of exercising this right have been presented, with reference to the case law of the Court of the Justice of the European Union (CJEU), including the key pro and con arguments.Then, the author discusses the discrepancies in the substance of this right on served in the CJEU jurisprudence (on the one hand) and the substance of this right as envisaged in the GDPR (on the other hand). Finally, the author analyzes the conditions under which this right can be exercised provisions, under the GDPR and the Serbian Personal Data on the Protection Act (2018), particularly in terms of the reasons that may lead to granting the request for erasure of personal data as well as the exceptions from exercising this right in case of balancing interests.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
|
*** (2008-2012) Zakon o zaštiti podataka o ličnosti. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 97/2008, 104/2009, 68/2012 - Odluka Ustavnog suda, 107/2012
|
|
|
*** (2016) Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, L 119/1 od 4. maja, 1-88
|
|
|
*** (2005-2019) Krivični zakonik Republike Srbije. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 85/2005, 88/2005 - ispr., 107/2005 - ispr., 72/2009, 111/2009, 121/2012, 104/2013, 108/2014 , 94/16, 35/19
|
|
|
*** (2000) Povelja evropske unije o ljudkim pravima. Official Journal of the European Communities, C 364/1 od 18. 12
|
|
|
*** (2003) Evropska konvencija o ljudskim pravima i osnovnim slobodama. Službeni list SCG - Međunarodni ugovori, br. 9
|
|
|
*** (2018) Zakon o zaštiti podataka o ličnosti. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 87
|
|
|
*** (2011/2012) Zakon o advokaturi. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 31, 24
|
|
|
*** (2006) Ustav republike Srbije. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 98
|
|
|
*** (2009-2016) Zakon o autorskim i srodnim pravima. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 104/2009, 99/2011, 119/2012 i 29/2016 - Odluka Ustavnog suda
|
|
|
*** (2014) Guidelines on the implementation of the Court of Justice of the European Union judgment on 'Google Spain and Inc v. Agencia española de protección de datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González'. Article 29 Data protection working party, 14/EN WP 225. C-131/12, 2014. [Electronic version]. Retrieved 29, January 2019, from https://www.pdpjournals.com/docs/88502.pdf
|
|
 
|
Arning, M., Moos, F., Schefzig, J. (2014) Vergiss (,) Europa! Ein Kommentar zu EuGH. Computer und Recht, Urt. v. 13. 5. 2014 - Rs. C-131/12 - Google/Mario Costeja Gonzalez, CR 2014, 460. 7. 447-456
|
|
|
Brkan, M. (2016) The Unstoppable Expansion of the EU Fundamental Right to Data Protection: Little Shop of Horrors?. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 5(Vol. 23). 812-841
|
|
3
|
Diligenski, A., Prlja, D., Cerović, D. (2018) Pravo zaštite podataka GDPR. Beograd: Institut za uporedno pravo
|
|
|
Eßer, M., Kramer, P., von Lewinski, K. (2018) Auernhammer DSGVO/BDSG (Datenschutz-Grundverordnung, Bundesdatenschutzgesetz und Nebengesetze: Kommentar). Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag
|
|
|
European Commission Myth-Busting: The Court of Justice of the EU and the 'Right to be Forgotten'. [Electronic version]. Retrieved 28, January 2019, from https://www.inforights.im/media/1187/cl_eu_rtbf_mythbuster.pdf
|
|
|
Floridi, L., i dr. (2015) The Advisory Council to Google on the Right to be Forgotten. [Electronic version]. Retrieved 29, January 2019, from https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/archive.google.com/en//advisorycouncil/advisement/advisory-report.pdf
|
|
|
Gola, P., Hrsg. (2018) Datenschutz-Grundverordnung VO (EU) 2016/679: Kommentar. München: C.H. Beck
|
|
|
Herr, A.C. (2015) Ein Jahr Recht auf Vergessenwerden 'im Zweifel für die Meinungsfreiheit'. Legal Tribune Online, [Electronic version]. Retrieved 29, June, 2019, from https://www.lto.de/recht/hintergruende/h/recht-auf-vergessenwerdenein-jahr-bilanz
|
|
|
Hornung, G., Hofmann, K. (2013) 'Ein Recht auf Vergessenwerden': Anspruch und Wirklichkeit eines neuen Datenschutzrechts. Juristen Zeitung, 4(Vol. 68). 163-170
|
|
|
Kelly, J.M., Satola, D. (2017) Right to be forgotten. University of Illinois Law Review, 1. 1-64
|
|
|
Kubis, M. (2017) Das 'Recht auf Vergessenwerden'. u: Datenschutz und Datensicherheit, 9. 583
|
|
|
Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2009) Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age. Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press
|
|
|
Moos, F., Schefzig, J., Arning, M., Hrsg. (2018) Die neue Datenschutz-Grundverordnung. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter
|
|
|
Sartor, G. (2016) The right to be forgotten: Balancing interests in the flux of time. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 24. 72-98
|
|
|
Schweitzer, D. (2017) Die digitale Person: Die Anrufung des Subjekts im 'Recht auf Vergessenwerden'. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 42. 237-257
|
|
|
Taeger, J., Gabel, D., Hrsg. (2019) Kommentar DSGVO-BDSG. Frankfurt am Main: Fachmedien Recht und Wirtschaft, dfv Mediengruppe
|
|
|
Vodinelić, V.V. (2018) Prava ličnosti - stare i nove dileme o nazivu i još ponečemu. u: Zvonimir Slakoper, Maja Bukovac-Puvača, Gabrijela Mihelčić [ur.] Zbornik radova u čast prof. dr. sc. Aldu Radoloviću - Liber amicorum Aldo Radolović, Sveučilište u Rijeci-Pravni fakultet, 259-300
|
|
|
Voigt, P., von Dem, B.A. (2018) EU-Dateschutz-Grundverordnung (DSGVO) Praktikerhandbuch, unter vollständiger Berücksichtigung des deutschen Datenschutz-Anpassungs-und-Umsetzungsgesetzes EU. Berlin: Springer
|
|
|
Wallisch, C. (2015) Das 'Recht auf Vergessenwerden' im Spannungsfeld von Privatsphäre und Meinungsfreiheit. Universität Wien, Masterarbeit, Betreuer: Hon.-Prof. Dr. Gottfried Korn
|
|
8 
|
Warren, S.D., Brandeis, L.D. (1890) The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5): 193-193
|
|
|
Zakaria, R. (2019) US makes hurdles even higher for visa applicants. [Electronic version]. Retrieved 10, June 2019, from https://edition.cnn.com/2019/06/05/ opinions/visa-applications-social-media-requirements-zakaria/index.html
|
|
|
|
|