Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:9
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:5

Contents

article: 1 from 20  
Back back to result list
2018, vol. 57, iss. 80, pp. 307-324
Alternative measures and sanctions for juveniles
University of Priština - Kosovska Mitrovica, Faculty of Law

emaildragan.blagic@pr.ac.rs
Keywords: juvenile; alternative measures and criminal sanctions; diversionary treatment
Abstract
From the standpoint of contemporary criminal policies, the essence of the application of these policies is to implement successful prevention programs, whose application primarily depends on the demonstrated subjective and objective factors of the minor's personality. Given that certain principles are based on the idea of preventive action and that punishment of minors is the last resort in the suppression of socially dangerous behavior, the observance of the envisaged principles is most pronounced in the protective and guaranty function of criminal law. In that regard, various reactions of the community to the behavior of minors indicate that contemporary trends of criminal policy find their place in the application of alternative criminal sanctions and measures. Thus, instead of conducting a classic criminal procedure, states use various forms of social response in view of resolving and removing negative consequences caused by juveniles. In the contemporary criminal law theory, two basic models are usually distinguished: the welfare model and the justice model, which are mutually opposed by many normative solutions. The restorative justice model and neo-correctionalism appear as subspecies of the previous two models. Thus, a lex specialis, the Act on Juvenile Criminal Offenders and Criminal-law Protection of Juveniles (hereinafter: the Juvenile Justice Act) prescribes that the criminal status of minors is primarily related to the use of measures of diversionary character, in full observance of the basic human rights and freedoms and with the aim of acting in the best interest of juveniles.
References
Ashworth, A. (2002) Responsibilities, Rights and Restorative Justice. British Journal of Criminology, 42(3): 578-595
Ćorović, E. (2013) Neke pravnoteorijske dileme u vezi sa kažnjavanjem maloletnika # Some legal and theoretical dilemmas related to punishment of minors. Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo, vol. 51, br. 1, str. 49-62
Dünkel, F. (2005) Juvenile justice system in Germany. Schriften zum Strafvollzug, Jugendstrafercht und zur Kriminologie, 32/4, Greifswald, 23
Eisenberg, U. (2009) Jugendgerichtsgesetz - Kommentar. München
Heinemann, E. (2011) Diversionsrichtlinien Im Jugendstrafrecht. Südwestdeutsche Verlag für Hochschulschriften, 16-17
Hudson, B. (2002) Restorative Justice and Gendered Violence: Diversion or Effective Justice?. British Journal of Criminology, 42(3): 616-634
Keightley-Smith, L. (2009) The dynamics of multi-agency working in the Final Warning Scheme in the North East of England. Northumbria University at Newcastle, 46
Konstantinović-Vilić, S., Kostić, M. (2007) Diverzioni modeli i alternativne krivične sankcije primenjene prema maloletnicima u sukobu sa zakonom. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, br. 50, str. 87-101
Laubenthal, K., Baier, H., Nestler, N. (2010) Jugendstrafrecht. Würzburg, 2. Auflage, 296-297
Lösching, M.G. (2002) Jugendstrafrecht in Europa. Freiburg: Kriminologische Forschungsberichte aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Ausländisches und Internationales Strafrecht, 273
Maleczky, O. (2008) Österreichisches Jugendstrafrecht. Wien: Kommentar, 17-18
Mrvić-Petrović, N., Đorđević, Đ. (1998) Moć i nemoć kazne. Beograd: Vojnoizdavački zavod
Mrvić-Petrović, N. (2006) Alternativne sankcije i novo zakonodavstvo Republike Srbije. Temida, vol. 9, br. 1, str. 55-59
Radulović, Lj. (2010) Maloletničko krivično pravo. Beograd
Stojanović, Z. (2014) Krivično pravo. Beograd
Streng, F. (2009) Jugendstrafrecht. Heidelber, 2. Auflage, 172
Škulić, M. (2011) Maloletničko krivično pravo. Beograd
Škulić, M. (2009) Alternativne krivične sankcije - pojam, mogućnosti i perspektive. in: Zbornik, Alternativne krivične sankcije i pojednostavljenje forme postupanja, Beograd, 48-49
Wiese, K. (2007) Juvenile Justice: A comparison between the laws of New Zealand and Germany. New Zealand: University of Canterbury, Law, 48-49
 

About

article language: Serbian
document type: Original Scientific Paper
DOI: 10.5937/zrpfni1880307B
published in SCIndeks: 24/01/2019
peer review method: double-blind
Creative Commons License 4.0

Related records

No related records