2016, vol. 14, br. 1, str. 81-95
|
|
Govor mržnje i pravni okviri govora mržnje u Srbiji i srpskim medijima
The normative framework of hate speech in Serbia and Serbian media
Sažetak
U radu se analizira pojam govora mržnje, definiše njegova suština i raspravlja o problemima njegove pravne regulacije. Polazi se od činjenice da je potpisivanje međunarodnih dokumenata koji se odnose na govor mržnje, a čiji je potpisnik i Srbija, dovelo do pozitivnih tendencija u pogledu prepoznavanja govora mržnje, njegovog razmatranja i sankcionisanja. Pošto je ovaj koncept definisan, razmatran je kroz analizu različitih pravnih odredbi, a zatim sagledavan kroz pravne okvire Srbije. Poseban deo rada je posvećen regulaciji govora mržnje u zakonima koji se odnose na medije u Srbiji, kao što su: Zakon o javnom informisanju i medijima, Zakon o elektronskim medijima i Zakon o javnim medijskim servisima, kao i Kodeks novinara Srbije. Na kraju rada, daje se sugestija da je za sprečavanje govora mržnje potrebno, najpre, razmotriti korene ove pojave i bolje je sagledati, a takođe se navodi i važna uloga medija i njegovih samoregulatornih tela u pogledu sprečavanja govora mržnje.
Abstract
The paper analyses the concept of hate speech and tries to define its essence and to highlight the problems of its legal regulation. Relying on the fact that the international documents related to hate speech have been signed by many countries (including Serbia), there are prominent positive tendencies towards recognizing, monitoring, and sanctioning hate speech. After providing a conceptual framework of hate speech, the paper first focuses on different legal provisions on hate speech embodied in relevant international documents. The subsequent analysis of the national legislative framework on hate speech includes relevant provisions of the Serbian Constitution, the Anti-Discrimination Act and the Serbian Criminal Code. In particular, the paper focuses on the regulation of hate speech in the media-related legislation in Serbia, including the Public Information and Media Act, the Electronic Media Act, the Public Media Services Act, and the Journalists' Code of Ethics. Finally, the author suggests that a possible solution for suppression of hate speech should be sought in its roots and a better understanding of its ethical aspects. In this respect, the role of media and self-regulatory bodies is very important.
|