Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:8
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:6

Sadržaj

članak: 8 od 11  
Back povratak na rezultate
2004, vol. 51, br. 1, str. 38-41
Sukob interesa u biomedicini
Institut za onkologiju i radiologiju Srbije, Beograd

e-adresaljvd@ncrc.ac.yu
Ključne reči: nauka; dobra naučna praksa; dobra urednička praksa; sukob interesa; obezbeđenje kvaliteta
Sažetak
Savremenu nauku, izrazito kompetitivnu oblast ljudskog delovanja, obeležavaju multidisciplinarnost i multiprofesionalnost. U svim fazama naučnog istraživanja, od konkurisanja za projekte do publikovanja rezultata istraživanja, učesnici u istraživanju mogu imati zajedničke ili, naprotiv, sukobljene interese. Sukob interesa, bilo finansijske ili nefinansijske prirode, je realnost, a način njegovog rešavanja tokom procesa publikovanja, posebno u biomedicini, je važan deo uredničkog posla. U ovom članku su izneti potencijalni izvori sukoba interesa svih učesnika u procesu publikovanja - autora, recenzenata i urednika biomedicinskih naučnih časopisa, kao i načini rešavanja situacija koje mogu da korumpiraju ovaj proces.
Reference
Campbell, P. (2001) Declaration of financial interests. Nature, 412(6849): 751
Daroff, R.B., Griggs, R.C. (2004) Scientific misconduct and breach of publication ethics. Neurology, 62, str. 352-358
Eisinger, F. (2002) Biomedical research and conflicts of interest. Presse Med, 31(36): 1686-9
Flanagin, A. (2000) Conflict of interest. u: Jones A.H., McLellan F. [ur.] Ethical issues in biomedical publication, Baltimore, MD, itd: Johns Hopkins University Press, str. 137-165
Good, C.D., Parente, S.T., Rennie, D., Fletcher, S.W. (1999) A worldwide assessment of medical journal editors' practices and needs: Results of a survey by the World Association of Medical Editors. S Afr Med J, 89(4): 397-401
Hussain, A., Smith, R. (2001) Declaring financial competing interests: Survey of five general medical journals. BMJ, 323(7307): 263-4
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2001) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to Biomedical Journals. http://www.icmje.org
Levinsky, N.G. (2002) Nonfinancial conflicts of interest in research. N Engl J Med, 347(10): 759-61
Milenković, P. (2001) Good scientific practice in research funding organizations. Archive of oncology, 9 (Suppl 2), str. 31-32
Milenković, P.B. (2002) Editorial communication with authors. Archive of Oncology, vol. 10, br. 2, str. 91-92
Milošević, D., Vučković-Dekić, L. (2003) Good scientific practice, ethical codex of science II. Proposals for safeguarding good scientific practice. Journal of BUON, vol. 8, br. 2, str. 93-95
Ray, J.G. (2002) Judging the judges: The role of journal editors. QJM, 95(12): 769-74
Schneider, C. (2000) Safeguarding good scientific practice: New institutional approaches in Germany. Sci Eng Ethics, 6(1): 49-56
Skolnick, A.A. (1998) SEC going after insider trading based on medical research results. Securities Exchange Commission. JAMA, 280(1): 10-1
Smith, R. (1998) Declaration of competing interest. Br Med J, 31, str. 291-292, www.bmj.com/guides/advice.shtm
Smith, R. (2001) Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record. BMJ, 323(7313): 588
Stojanović, N.N., Borojević, N.D., Vučković-Dekić, L. (2003) Good scientific practice: Ethical codex of science I. Formulating ethical codex of science: a Pan-European initiative. Journal of BUON, vol. 8, br. 1, str. 7-10
The Publications Committee (1999) Ethical guidelines for publications of research. Endocr Rev, 20, str. 1-2
Vučković-Dekić, L. (2000) Kako ja recenziram rukopis naučnog rada. Stomatološki glasnik Srbije, 47, str. 127-31
Vučković-Dekić, L. (2002) Peer review system: Professional ethics. Archive of Oncology, vol. 10, br. 2, str. 95-97
Vučković-Dekić, L. (2004) Role of journals in addressing scientific misconduct - Council of science editors retreat with funding from the Office of Research Integrity, November 7-9, 2003, Lansdowne, Virginia, USA. Croatian Medical Journal, vol. 45, br. 1, str. 104-106
Vučković-Dekić, L. (2004) Combating scientific fraud. Balkan Journal of Stomatology, vol. 8, str. 87-8
Vučković-Dekić, L., Božinović, Lj. (2004) Dobra urednička praksa i sukob interesa. u: Slavković V [ur.] Medicinski članci i časopisi, Beograd
Vučković-Dekić, L. (2002) Dobra naučna praksa - autorstvo/koautorstvo. u: Milenković P. [ur.] Dr Vera Pavlović-Kentera - život i delo, Beograd: Institut za medicinska istraživanja, str. 45-47
Wager, E., Godlee, F., Jefferson, T. (2002) How to survive peer review. London: BMJ Publishing Group
 

O članku

jezik rada: srpski
vrsta rada: članak
DOI: 10.2298/SGS0401038V
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 02.06.2007.

Povezani članci

Tehnika - Kval stand metrol (2006)
Dobra praksa u onkologiji
Jovićević-Bekić Ana, i dr.

Vojnosanitetski pregled (2006)
Autori i 'autori'
Ignjatović Mile

Psihijatrija danas (1998)
Potreba za etičkim kodeksom u istraživanju
Kuschel Rolf

prikaži sve [13]