Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:19
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:18

Contents

article: 8 from 22  
Back back to result list
2019, vol. 22, iss. 2, pp. 239-254
The frame and name of the medical treatment and their influence on health decisions
aUniversity of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy
bUniversity of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Laboratory for Experimental Psychology
cUniversity of Belgrade, Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation

emailkdamnjan@f.bg.ac.rs
Project:
Identification, measurement and development of the cognitive and emotional competences important for a Europe-oriented society (MESTD - 179018)

Keywords: health decision; shared decision making; risky choice; framing effect; medical treatment; surgery; radiation; prospect theory; fuzzy-trace theory; patient
Abstract
Decisions about one's own health range from everyday easy ones, such as taking a vitamin pill, to those made in the situations of life-threatening diseases. When it comes to choosing treatments, patients have difficulty understanding statistical information about the possible outcomes of alternative treatments, such as probabilities and risks. These challenges are especially important in the context of the shared decision-making. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of the labelling of the treatment in risky choice decision tasks. The risky choice framing effect (FE) pertains to the systematic preference reversal because different aspects of formally identical situations are emphasized. In the present study, the participants made a forced choice between a non-risky and risky treatment presented in terms of gains and losses. In the first condition surgery was the risky option and in the second it was radiation. In the third condition, the treatments' labels were replaced with ' A' and 'B'. Chi-square tests revealed a significant difference in the proportions of risky choices between the three conditions. The FE was registered only in the first and the second condition, and it was moderate and strong, respectively. When choosing between surgery and radiation, participants' choices were indeed influenced by the naming of the treatment, but not exclusively-they generally preferred surgery, and when it was offered in terms of losses, they preferred it even more.
References
Almashat, S., Ayotte, B., Edelstein, B., Margrett, J. (2008) Framing effect debiasing in medical decision making. Patient education and counseling, 71(1): 102-107
Appelbaum, P.S., Grisso, T. (1988) Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment. New England journal of medicine, 319(25): 1635-1638
Bigman, C.A., Cappella, J.N., Hornik, R.C. (2010) Effective or ineffective: Attribute framing and the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. Patient education and counseling, 81: S70-S76
Blumenthal-Barby, J.S., Krieger, H. (2015) Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: A critical review using a systematic search strategy. Medical decision making, 35: 539-557
Brewer, N.T., Weinstein, N.D., Cuite, C.L., Herrington, J.E. (2004) Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behavior. Annals of behavioral medicine, 27(2): 125-130
Coulter, A., Collins, A. (2011) Making shared decision-making a reality. London: King's Fund
Covey, J. (2007) A meta-analysis of the effects of presenting treatment benefits in different formats. Medical decision making, 27(5): 638-654
Damnjanovic, K., Gvozdenovic, V. (2016) Influence of the probability level on the framing effect. Psychological topics, 25(3); 405-429; Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/169520
Damnjanović, K. (2013) Framing effect and domain of decision. in: Book of abstracts of the Scientific; Professional Conference: Current Trends in Psychology; 2013 October 11-13, Novi Sad, Serbia, Novi Sad: Faculty of Philosophy, pp 113-115; Available from: http://psihologija.ff.uns.ac.rs/repository/puni. php?sifra=stup2013081#page=115
Dawson, N.V., Arkes, H.R. (1987) Systematic errors in medical decision making. Journal of general internal medicine, 2(3): 183-187
Edwards, A., Elwyn, G., Covey, J., Matthews, E., Pill, R. (2001) Presenting risk information a review of the effects of framing and other manipulations on patient outcomes. Journal of health communication, 6(1): 61-82
Elwyn, G., Laitner, S., Coulter, A., Walker, E., Watson, P., Thomson, R. (2010) Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ, 341(14 2), 5146-5146
Fagley, N.S., Miller, P.M. (1997) Framing effects and arenas of choice: Your money or your life?. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 71(3): 355-373
Ferrer, R.A., Klein, W., Lerner, J.S., Reyna, V., Keltner, D. (2014) Emotions and health decision making: Extending the appraisal tendency framework to improve health and health care. in: Behav econ public health
Ferrer, R.A., Klein, W.M. (2015) Risk perceptions and health behavior. Current opinion in psychology, 5: 85-89
Fischer, G.W., Hawkins, S.A. (1993) Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility, and the prominence effect. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 19(3): 580-597
Garcia-Retamero, R., Galesic, M. (2010) How to reduce the effect of framing on messages about health. Journal of general internal medicine, 25(12): 1323-1329
Haward, M.F., Murphy, R.O., Lorenz, J.M. (2008) Message framing and perinatal decisions. Pediatrics, 122(1): 109-118
Horne, R., Weinman, J. (1999) Patients' beliefs about prescribed medicines and their role in adherence to treatment in chronic physical illness. Journal of psychosomatic research, 47(6): 555-567
Huang, Y., Wang, L. (2010) Sex differences in framing effects across task domain. Personality and individual differencess, 48(5): 649-653
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2): 263-263
Levin, I.P., Schnittjer, S.K., Thee, S.L. (1988) Information framing effects in social and personal decisions. Journal of experimental social psychology, 24(6): 520-529
Levin, I.P., Gaeth, G.J., Schreiber, J., Lauriola, M. (2002) A new look at framing effects: Distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 88(1): 411-429
Marsh, K., Ijzerman, M., Thokala, P., Baltussen, R., Boysen, M., Kaló, Z., Lönngren, T., Mussen, F., Peacock, S., Watkins, J., Devlin, N. (2016) Multiple criteria decision analysis for health care decision making-emerging good practices: Report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA emerging good practices task force. Value in health, 19(2): 125-137
Mazur, D.J., Hickam, D.H. (1996) Patient preferences for management of localized prostate cancer. Western journal of medicine, 165(1-2), 26-30; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1307537/pdf/westjmed00347-0028.pdf
McNeil, B.J., Pauker, S.G., Sox, H.C., Tversky, A. (1982) On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. New England journal of medicine, 306(21): 1259-1262
Moxey, A., o'Connell Dianne,, McGettigan, P., Henry, D. (2003) Describing treatment effects to patients. Journal of general internal medicine, 18(11): 948-959
Ozdemir, S., Finkelstein, E.A. (2018) Cognitive bias: The downside of shared decision making. JCO Clinical cancer informatics, 2(2): 1-10
Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R., Johnson, E.J. (1988) Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 14(3): 534-552
Peters, E., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C.K., Mazzocco, K., Dickert, S. (2006) Numeracy and decision making. Psychological science, 17(5): 407-413
Petrova, D., Garcia-Retamero, R., Cokely, E.T. (2015) Understanding the harms and benefits of cancer screening: A model of factors that shape informed decision making. Medical decision Making, 35(7): 847-858
Reyna, V.F., Brainerd, C.J. (2007) The importance of mathematics in health and human judgment: Numeracy, risk communication, and medical decision making. Learning and individual differences, 17(2): 147-159
Reyna, V.F., Brainerd, C.J. (1995) Fuzzy-trace theory: Some foundational issues. Learning and individual differences, 7(2), 145-162
Reyna, V.F. (2008) A theory of medical decision making and health: Fuzzy trace theory. Medical decision making, 28(6): 850-865
Reyna, V.F., Brainerd, C.J. (2008) Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learning and individual differences, 18(1): 89-107
Reyna, V.F., Nelson, W.L., Han, P.K., Dieckmann, N.F. (2009) How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychological bulletin, 135(6): 943-973
Reyna, V.F., Nelson, W.L., Han, P.K., Pignone, M.P. (2015) Decision making and cancer. American psychologist, 70(2): 105-118
Reyna, V.F., Brainerd, C.J. (1991) Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in choice: Gist extraction, truncation, and conversion. Journal of behavioral decision making, 4(4): 249-262
Reyna, V.F., Lloyd, F.J., Brainerd, C.J. (2003) Memory, development, and rationality: An integrative theory of judgment and decision making. in: Schneider S.L., Shanteau J. [ed.] Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research, New York: Cambridge University Press, 201-245
Saposnik, G., Redelmeier, D., Ruff, C.C., Tobler, P.N. (2016) Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: A systematic review. BMC Medical informatics and decision making, 16(1)
Slade, M. (2017) Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care. World psychiatry, 16(2): 146-153
Steginga, S.K., Occhipinti, S., Gardiner, R.A., Yaxley, J., Heathcote, P. (2002) Making decisions about treatment for localized prostate cancer. BJU International, 89(3): 255-260
Stokes, W.A., Bronsert, M.R., Meguid, R.A., Blum, M.G., Jones, B.L., Koshy, M., Sher, D.J., Louie, A.V., Palma, D.A., Senan, S., Gaspar, L.E., Kavanagh, B.D., Rusthoven, C.G. (2018) Post-treatment mortality after surgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Journal of clinical oncology, 36(7): 642-651
Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481): 453-458
Wang, X.T. (1996) Domain-specific rationality in human choices: Violations of utility axioms and social contexts. Cognition, 60(1), 31-63
Wang, X.T. (1996) Framing effects: Dynamics and task domains. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 68: 145-157
 

About

article language: English
document type: Original Scientific Paper
DOI: 10.5937/PSISTRA22-23375
published in SCIndeks: 30/01/2020
peer review method: double-blind
Creative Commons License 4.0

Related records

Anali Pravnog fak Beograd (2019)
Empirical study of the framing effect as a cognitive bias
Mojašević Aleksandar S.

Psihologija (2007)
Valence framing of political preferences and resistance to persuasion
Žeželj Iris, et al.

Psihologija (2009)
Unrealistic optimism and decision making
Božović Bojana, et al.

show all [15]