• citations in SCIndeks: [1]
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:2
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:0


article: 10 from 25  
Back back to result list
2015, iss. 3, pp. 79-96
Legal and institutional perspectives of the European Union
Institute of Comparative Law, Belgrade + University Singidunum, Faculty of Media and Communications, Belgrade
This study focuses on the institutional perspectives of the European Union (EU) through the analysis of the relevant parts of the new Lisbon Treaty on the EU (2009). Special emphasis is put on the specific status of the EU in the international law, bearing in mind that the EU has obtained the legal personality recently, by entering into force of the Lisbon Treaty. This means its capacity to conclude various international agreements on behalf of the whole entity of the Union and to achieve the membership status in international organizations. Furthermore, clear division of the competences between the Member States and the European institutions has been made, together with listing of shared competences. The aim is to secure effective and smooth functioning of the EU. However, the final objective of the institutional improvements is to enable efficient enlargement of the EU. In concluding remarks, the author estimates that the process of the institutional reforms of the EU is not finished, but will depend on achievement of political unity through permanent negotiations within the Union. The current monetary crisis that has shaken the Union over the past few years indicates that the further reforms of the EU law, i.e., its constituent agreements, as well as reforms in the direction of the EU transformation into an important political factor, and not just an economic giant. To the extent that the EU is able to reconcile these contradictions and to fulfill the gap between its own economic success and attractiveness to non-member countries, on the one hand and its political inferiority and a lack of coherence at the EU level, on the other hand, to that extent future economic and legal prosperity of the Union will develop.
*** (2011) Joined Cases C-411/10 and C-493/10, N.S. v Home Secretary and M.E. v. refugee applications commissioner. [2011] EUECJ C-411/10, (21 December 2011),, 18.9.2015
Balibar, E. (2014) 'A New Impulse - But for which Europe?', The Urgency of Thought II. Belgrade Journal of Media and Communications, Volume III, 6, 121-122
Barrass, R., Shobhana, M. (1998) European Economic Integration and Sustainable Development - Institutions, Issues and Policies. London: McGraw-Hill Book Company
Borchardt, K.D. (2000) The ABC of Community Law. Brussels - Luxembourg
Brusis, M., Emmanouilidis, J.A., ur. (2002) Thinking enlarged: The accession countries and the future of the European Union. in: Weidenfeld Werner [ed.] Munich Contributions to European Unification, Bonn: Europa Union Verlag, Volume 7, 27
Cartou, L. (1991) Communautes europeennes. Paris: Dalloz
Corbett, R. (2001) The European Parliament's role in closer EU integration. Great Britain: Palgrave, Foreword by Klaus Hansch, President of the European Parliament, 1994-97
Craig, P., de Burcá, G. EU Law: Text, cases and materials. 5th ed. 395
Dehousse, R., Deloche-Gaudez, F. (2006) Vers une banalisation du vote au Conseil?. in: Dehousse R., Deloche-Gaudez F., Duhamel O. [ed.] Elargissement: Comment l'Europe s'adapte, Paris: Centre d'etudes europeennes, 57-59
Dobre, A., Gistelinck, M., Polacek, M., Hunink, R., ur. (2005) Handbook on EU affairs. Bucharest: European Institute of Romania, EU Project, Sept, 56
Đurković, M. (2013) Kriza, federalizacija i otpori. in: Gajić A., Igrutinović M. [ed.] Kriza EU - okviri, dometi i trendovi, Beograd: IES, 57
European Central Bank (2004) The monetary policy of the ECB. Frankfurt am Main, 41-45
Fondation R. Schuman (2015) The European Democratic Divide. in: Policy Paper No. 363,, 20.07.2015
Gasmi, G. (2013) Pravo i osnovi prava Evropske unije. Beograd, 104
Gasmi, G. (2010) Pravo i osnovi prava Evropske unije. Beograd: Univerzitet Singidunum
Hiks, S. (2007) Politički sistem EU. Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 83
Ilić-Gasmi, G. (2004) Reforme EU - institucionalni aspekti. Beograd: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 204-215
Knežević-Predić, V. (2001) Ogled o suverenosti - suverenost i Evropska unija. Beograd: Institut za političke studije
Mathijsen, P. (1995) A Guide to European Union Law. London, 17
Mouton, J-D., Vandamme, J. (1995) L'Avenir de l'Union Europeenne: Elargir et Approfondir. Bruxelles
Peterson, J., Shackleton, M. (2002) The institutions of the European Union. Oxford University Press, 102-105
Piris, J., Merkel, A. (2009) The Lisbon Treaty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Prokopijević, M. (2014) Menja li se računica članstva u Evropskoj uniji?. Kultura Polisa, posebno izdanje: Izazovi pristupanja Republike Srbije Evropskoj uniji, 110-113
Samardžić, S. (1999) Evropska unija kao model supranacionalne zajednice. Beograd, 54
Sapir, J. (2012) Faut-il sortir de l'euro?. Paris: Seuil, 38
Shaw, J. (1999) The Law of the EU. London, 3rd Edition, 31
Siđanski, D. (2003) At the heart of the European Constitution: A two-headed presidency and bicameral legislative power. Geneva,, May
Siđanski, D. (2002) U traganju za novim evropskim federalizmom. Beograd, 38
Stojanović, R. (1998) Spoljna politika Evropske unije. Beograd: Dosije
Thierry, C., Lefebvre, M. After the Lisbon treaty: Does the European Union finally have a telephone number. 30th November 2009,


article language: Serbian
document type: Original Scientific Paper
published in SCIndeks: 04/07/2016

Related records

No related records