Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:0
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:0

Contents

article: 2 from 11  
Back back to result list
2013, vol. 38, iss. 1, pp. 1-13
Effect of a polymer on mitigating ammonia emission from liquid dairy manure
University of Idaho, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Moscow, USA

emaillchen@uidaho.edu
Keywords: ammonia; emission; emission reduction; dairy manure; polymer
Abstract
Reducing ammonia (NH3) emissions from manure has been a great interest for academic, regulators, dairy farmers, and the general public. Fresh liquid dairy manure was collected from a dairy central pit. A polymer (MTMTM) was tested at five different doses to determine if the polymer had any effects on reducing NH3 emission from the manure. Ogawa NH3 passive samplers were used to trap NH3 emitted from the manure for two, four, six, eight, 12, and 24 hours during two separate tests, respectively. Samples collected via the passive samplers were analyzed for ammonium-N (NH4-N) concentrations by a QuickChem 8500 system. Manure pH values were monitored before and after applying the polymer to the manure. The average concentration reductions of NH4-N in the extractant were 8.1%, 20.7%, 36.5%, 54.5%, and 88.2% for the polymer Treatments 1 to 5 over the entire test period, respectively. Statistically significant differences of the NH4-N concentration and manure pH were detected between the treatments and controls. However, a lower dose treatment (0.5 ml polymer/5 l manure) did not show significant differences of the NH4-N concentration and pH from control for the two-, four-, six-, and eight-hour samples, but showed significant differences for both the 12- and 24-hour samples. The test results have shown that a higher dose of polymer led to a lower manure pH and a lower NH3 emission. Further studies are needed to test if the pH adjustment was the only mechanism for reducing NH3 emission or other effects existed as well.
References
Demmers, T., Burgess, L., Short, J., Phillips, V., Clark, J., Wathes, C. (1998) First experiences with methods to measure ammonia emissions from naturally ventilated cattle buildings in the U.K. Atmospheric Environment, 32(3): 285-293
Erisman, J., Schaap, M. (2004) The need for ammonia abatement with respect to secondary PM reductions in Europe. Environmental Pollution, 129(1): 159-163
Hristov, A.N., Hanigan, M., Cole, A., Todd, R., McAllister, T.A., Ndegwa, P.M., Rotz, A. (2011) Review: Ammonia emissions from dairy farms and beef feedlots 1. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 91(1): 1-35
Hutchinson, G.L., Viets, F.G. (1969) Nitrogen enrichment of surface water by absorption of ammonia volatilized from cattle feedlots. Science (New York, N.Y.), 166(3904): 514-5
Jensen, A.Ø. (2002) Changing the environment in swine buildings using sulfuric acid. Transactions of the ASAE, 45(1): 223-227
Krupa, S. (2003) Effects of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) on terrestrial vegetation: a review. Environmental Pollution, 124(2): 179-221
Leytem, A.B., Bjorneberg, D.L., Sheffield, R.E., de Haro, M.M.E. (2009) Case Study: On-Farm evaluation of liquid dairy manure application methods to reduce ammonia losses. Professional Animal Scientist, 25, 93-98
Lovanh, N., Warren, J., Sistani, K. (2010) Determination of ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from land application of swine slurry: a comparison of three application methods. Bioresource technology, 101(6): 1662-7
McCubbin, D.R., Apelberg, B.J., Roe, S., Divita, F. (2002) Livestock ammonia management and particulate-related health benefits. Environmental science & technology, 36(6): 1141-6
Ndegwa, P.M., Hristov, A.N., Arogo, J., Sheffield, R.E. (2008) A review of ammonia emission mitigation techniques for concentrated animal feeding operations. Biosystems Engineering, 100(4): 453-469
Roadman, M., Scudlark, J., Meisinger, J., Ullman, W. (2003) Validation of Ogawa passive samplers for the determination of gaseous ammonia concentrations in agricultural settings. Atmospheric Environment, 37(17): 2317-2325
Shah, S.B., Westerman, P.W., Arogo, J. (2006) Measuring Ammonia Concentrations and Emissions from Agricultural Land and Liquid Surfaces: A Review. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 56(7): 945-960
Shi, Y., Parker, D.B., Cole, N.A., Auvermann, B.W., Mehlhorn, J.E. (2001) Surface amendments to minimize ammonia emissions from beef cattle feedlots. Transactions of the ASAE, 44(3): 677-682
Sickles, J.E., Hodson, L.L., Vorburger, L.M. (1999) Evaluation of the filter pack for long-duration sampling of ambient air. Atmospheric Environment, 33(14): 2187-2202
Sutton, M.A., Pitcairn, C.E.R., Fowler, D. (1993) The Exchange of Ammonia Between the Atmosphere and Plant Communities. Advances in Ecological Research, 24: 301-393
Thöni, L., Seitler, E., Blatter, A., Neftel, A. (2003) A passive sampling method to determine ammonia in ambient air. Journal of environmental monitoring, 5(1): 96-9
 

About

article language: English
document type: Original Scientific Paper
published in SCIndeks: 24/03/2014

Related records

No related records