Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:8
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:3

Contents

article: 6 from 9  
Back back to result list
2013, vol. 61, iss. 5-6, pp. 386-400
Importance of institutions in terms of competitiveness improvement and economic success
University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Economy, Department of General Economics and Economic Development
Project:
Challenges and Prospects of Structural Changes in Serbia: Strategic Directions for Economic Development and Harmonization with EU Requirements (MESTD - 179015)

Keywords: institutional environment; competitiveness of the national economy; business environment; economic prosperity
Abstract
In view of the fact that competition constitutes one of the key postulates of the economic prosperity of both the national economy and its economic entities, this paper brings to attention the need for its continuous improvement. Improvement of competitiveness of a national economy is the most reliable way to achieve economic growth and development, and thus improve the prosperity of the citizens. In this regard, the paper discusses different theoretical approaches to this important economic problem and analyzes the key factors of economic competitiveness. In accordance with the subject of this research, the emphasis is given to the importance of institutions, since they are crucial for creating a competitive business environment and improving competitiveness and economic success. The research implies that it is necessary to determine the level of competitiveness, as well as the state of basic economic institutions, in order to identify both strengths and weaknesses of the national economy as preconditions for the creation and implementation of relevant competitiveness and economic success improvement policies. Such approach is particularly important for overcoming devastating economic conditions in Serbia, which have been present for many years. The paper stresses the importance of the enforcement of contracts and property rights, judicial independence, quality and professionalism of public administration, as key institutions in Serbia's economy which must be consistently regulated in order to be able to contribute to improving the national economy competitiveness. Furthermore, it is pointed out that the institutions, by creating a favorable environment for successful development of economic activities, represent a very important factor in improving the competitiveness of the national economy, and hence provide a solid basis for the long-term growth and development.
References
*** (2007-2013) The global competitiveness report (2007-2008; 2008-2009; 2009-2010; 2010-2011; 2011-2012; 2012-2013). Geneva: World Economic Forum / WEF
Ahmetov, T.R. (2004) Konkurentnosposobnost' v uslovijah globalizacii, Institut social'no ëkonomičeskih issledovanij. UNC
Avdaševa, S., Šastitko, A. (2003) Promyšlennaja i konkurentnaja politika: problemy vzaimodejstvija i uroki dlja Rossii. Voprosy ekonomiki, (9): 18-32
Đuričin, D. (2008) Srbija 2007 - stanje i prioriteti reformi. in: Rosić I., Leković V. [ed.] Institucionalne promene kao determinanta privrednog razvoja Srbije, Kragujevac: Ekonomski fakultet, 3-31
Erasova, E.A. (2002) Konkurentnosposobnost' ëkonomiki sovremenoj Rosii: Pokazateli i ëkspernye ocenki. Vestnik SPbGU, Ser, 5. Vyp. 2 (No 13)
Krugman, P. (1996) Making sense of the competitiveness debate. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12(3): 17-25
Kuz'minov, J., Radaev, V., Jakovlev, A., Jasin, E. (2005) Instituty: ot zaimstvovanija k vyraščivaniju. Voprosy ekonomiki, (5): 5-27
Madžar, L. (2013) Institucionalna dinamika kao determinanta privrednog razvitka - sa osvrtom na Kinu. Ekonomika preduzeća, vol. 61, br. 3-4, str. 163-173
Mitrović, B., Stefanović, Z. (2007) Institucionalne pretpostavke povećanja konkurentnosti privrede Srbije. Teme, vol. 31, br. 2, str. 263-272
Mroczkowski, T. (2012) New players in life science innovation: Best practice in research and development from around the world. New Jersey: FT Press Upper Saddle River
North, D.C. (1994) Economic performanse through time. American Economic Review, 84(3), 359-68
Picot, A., Pepperger, T., Wolff, B. (1996) The fading boundaries of the firm: The role of information and communication technology. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 152(1): 56-79
Polterovič, V. (1999) Institucional'nye lovuški i ekonomičeskie reformy. Ekonomika i matematičeskie metody, 35(2): 1-37
Porter, M.E. (1998) The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press
Porter, M.E. (2008) O konkurenciji. Beograd: Fakultet za ekonomiju, finansije i administraciju
Praščević, A. (2013) Dometi ekonomske politike u prevazilaženju efekata globalne ekonomske krize na ekonomiju Srbije. Ekonomski horizonti, vol. 15, br. 1, str. 17-30
Stiglitz, J.E. (2010) Freefall: America, free markets, and the sinking of the world economy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc
 

About

article language: English
document type: Original Scientific Paper
DOI: 10.5937/ekopre1306386L
published in SCIndeks: 15/10/2013