Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: [2]
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:61
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:33

Contents

article: 3 from 16  
Back back to result list
2018, vol. 20, iss. 1, pp. 45-59
Biases in the decision-making process and possibilities of overcoming them
University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Economy, Serbia

emailjnikolic@kg.ac.rs
Keywords: decision-making process; decision-makers; bounded rationality; mental strategies; biases
Abstract
Starting from the normative approach, a decision as the outcome of the decision-making process should represent a rational choice made by a completely informed decision-maker. With the development of the behavioral perspective of the decision-making process, certain mistakes in decision-makers' behavior have been noticed, emerging as a consequence of their limited cognitive capacities and the information asymmetry. The application of heuristics as simplified mental strategies, as well as certain deformations in decision-makers' thinking and perception, leads to the different biases that affect their attitudes and approach to problem solving. The aim of the research study is reflected in identifying the biases that most often occur in the decision-making process, as well as their causes and consequences. The qualitative methodology of the research has been applied in parallel with the relevant methods of analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction. On the basis of the conducted empirical studies, the recommendations for overcoming biases have been defined, which represents the main result of the research study. The derived conclusions with respect to the possibilities of overcoming biases can help decision-makers to improve the decision-making process in real situations.
References
Babić, V. (1995) Strategijsko odlučivanje. Beograd: Institut za ekonomiku i finansije
Božović, B., Gvozdenović, V. (2009) Nerealistični optimizam i donošenje odluka. Psihologija, vol. 42, br. 4, str. 567-584
Busenitz, L.W., Barney, J.B. (1997) Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1): 9-30
Campitelli, G., Gobet, F. (2010) Herbert Simon's decision-making approach: Investigation of cognitive processes in experts. Review of General Psychology, 14(4): 354-364
Chi, T., Fan, D. (1997) Cognitive Limitations and Investment 'Myopia'. Decision Sciences, 28(1): 27-57
Chira, I., Adams, M., Thornton, B. (2011) Behavioral Bias Within The Decision Making Process. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 6(8): 11-20
de Neys, W. (2010) Heuristic bias, conflict, and rationality in decision-making. in: Glatzeder B.M., Goel V., Müller A. [ed.] Towards a Theory of Thinking, Berlin: Springer, On Thinking, pp. 22-33, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03129-8_2
Fiedler, K., von Sydow, M. (2015) Heuristics and biases: Beyond Tversky and Kahneman's (1974) judgment under uncertainty. in: Eysenck M., Groome D. [ed.] Revisiting the Classical Studies, Sage Publications, Retrieved March 9, 2018, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280981235_Heuristics_and_Biases_Beyond_Tversky_and_Kahneman%27s_1974_Judgment_under_Uncertainty
Forbes, D.P. (2005) Are some entrepreneurs more overconfident than others?. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(5): 623-640
Golden, J., Milewicz, J., Herbig, P. (1994) Forecasting: Trials and Tribulations. Management Decision, 32(1): 33-36
Hammond, J., Keeney, R., Raiffa, H. (2006) The hidden traps in decision making. Harvard Business Review, 84(1): 118-127
Harrison, E. F. (1996) A process perspective on strategic decision making. Management Decision, 34(1): 46-53
Henman, D.L. (2008) How to avoid the hidden traps of decision making. Retrieved March 9, 2018, from http://www.henmanperformancegroup.com/articles/Avoid-Hidden-Traps.pdf
Hodgkinson, G.P., Maule, A. J., Bown, N.J., Pearman, A.D., Glaister, K.W. (2002) Further reflections on the elimination of framing bias in strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11): 1069-1076
Howard, A.R., Abbas, E.A. (2016) Foundation of Decision Analysis. England: Pearson Education Limited
Huber, G. (1980) Managerial Decision Making. London: Longman Higher Education
Jamieson, K., Hyland, P. (2006) Good Intuition or Fear and Uncertainty: The Effects of Bias on Information Systems Selection Decisions. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 9: 049-069
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 2, 263-291
Korte, R.F. (2003) Biases in Decision Making and Implications for Human Resource Development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(4): 440-457
Levinthal, D.A. (2011) A behavioral approach to strategy-what's the alternative?. Strategic Management Journal, 32(13): 1517-1523
Maitland, E., Sammartino, A. (2014) Decision making and uncertainty: The role of heuristics and experience in assessing a politically hazardous environment. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10): 1554-1578
Maqsood, T., Finegan, A., Walker, D. (2008) Biases and heuristics in judgment and decision making: The dark side of tacit knowledge. Informing Science and Information Technology, 295-301; 1; doi: 10.28945/740
March, J.G. (1994) A primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York, itd: Free Press
McKenzie, J., van Winkelen, C., Grewal, S. (2011) Developing organisational decision‐making capability: a knowledge manager's guide. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(3): 403-421
Menon, A. (2017) Bringing cognition into strategic interactions: Strategic mental models and open questions. Strategic Management Journal, 39(1): 168-192
Mustilli, M., Piccolo, R., d`Angelo Eugenio (2018) Cross-Country Differences in How Behavioral Biases Affect Decision-Making in the Bank Industry: Evidence from Italy and Serbia. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 08(02): 239-249
Parnell, G.S., Bresnick, T.A., Tani, S.N., Johnson, E.R., Bresnick, T.A., Parnell, G.S. (2013) Decision-Making Challenges. in: Handbook of Decision Analysis, Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, str. 22-45
Pavličić, D. (2015) Teorija odlučivanja. Beograd: Ekonomski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu
Riaz, T., Iqbal, H. (2015) Impact of overconfidence, illusion of control, self control and optimism bias on investors decision making: Evidence from developing markets. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(11): 110-116
Roxburg, C. (2003) Hidden flaws in strategy. The McKinsey Quarterly, 27(2), 21-30. Retrieved January 28, 2018, from https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/hidden-flaws-in-strategy
Samuelson, W., Zeckhauser, R. (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1): 7-59
Simon, H.A. (1966) Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioural Science. American Economic Review, 9(3), 253-283
Simon, H.A. (1955) A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1): 99
Simon, M., Houghton, S.M. (2003) The Relationship between Overconfidence and the Introduction of Risky Products: Evidence from a Field Study. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2): 139-149
Sklad, M., Diekstra, R. (2014) The Development of the Heuristics and Biases Scale (HBS). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112: 710-718
Tiwana, A., Wang, J., Keil, M., Ahluwalia, P. (2007) The Bounded Rationality Bias in Managerial Valuation of Real Options: Theory and Evidence from IT Projects. Decision Sciences, 38(1): 157-181
Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1974) Jjudgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131
Wang, P. (1996) Heuristics and normative models of judgment under uncertainty. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 14(4): 221-235
Zlatanović, D. (2010) Strukturiranje upravljačkih problemskih situacija Metodologijom soft sistema. Ekonomski horizonti, 12(2): 95-112
Zlatanović, D., Nikolić, J. (2017) Strategic Decision Making From the Viewpoint of Systems Thinking. IGI Global, str. 98-118
 

About

article language: Serbian, English
document type: Review Paper
DOI: 10.5937/ekonhor1801045N
published in SCIndeks: 11/05/2018
Creative Commons License 4.0

Related records

No related records