Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: [1]
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:3
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:0

Contents

article: 5 from 5  
Back back to result list
2003, vol. 8, iss. 1, pp. 51-70
Meting out penalty in law of torts
Criminology and Police Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: law of torts; meting out a penalty; relatively defined penalties; absolutely defined penalties; proportionate penalties
Abstract
This paper describes the manners of meting out a penalty in the law of torts. In contrast to criminal law, the law of torts uses three systems of meting out the tortuous penalty: The system of relatively defined penalties, the system of absolutely defined penalties and the system of proportionate penalties. The system of relatively defined penalties is dominant, but the other two also apply to some torts. This paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of these systems as well as the range of their application in the domestic law of torts. It also points to the differences emerging in our codes of torts to this effect as well as to the need to overcome them in the course of forthcoming reform of our tort-related legislation.
References
Čejović, B.M. (1995) Krivično pravo - opšti deo. Niš, str. 407
Delmas-Marty, M. (1988) Différenciation des systèmes juridiques de sanctions à dominante pénale ou administrative. Revue internationale de droit penal, br. 1-2, str. 35
Dimitrijević, P.J. (2001) Prekršajno pravo - opšti deo - sa sudskom praksom, obrascima za primenu i registrom pojmova. Beograd: Službeni glasnik
Dolcini, E. (1988) Les problèmes juridiques et pratiques posés par la différence antre droit criminel et droit administratif pénal. Revue internationale de droit penal, br. 1-2, 281
Gauthier, J. (1988) Les problèmes juridiques et pratiques posés par la différence antre droit criminel et droit administratif pénal. Revue internationale de droit penal, br. 1-2, str. 409
Grubač, M.V., Perić, O.M., Pihler, S. (1982) Osnovi prava o privrednim prestupima. Beograd: Privredna štampa
Jovanović, L.S., Jelačić, M. (1997) Prekršaji i privredni prestupi. Beograd: Policijska akademija
Jovanović, L.S. (1995) Krivično pravo - opšti deo. Beograd, str. 376
Marino, R., Gatti, G. (1992) Codice penale e leggi complementarii. Napoli: Simone
Miklau, R. (1988) The legal and practical problems posed by the difference between Criminal Law and Administrative Penal Law. Revue internationale de droit penal, br. 1-2, str. 111
Pihler, S. (2000) Prekršajno pravo. Novi Sad: Graphica Academica
Saleilles, R. (1899) L'individualisation de la peine. Paris, str. 54
Schonke, A., Schroder, H. (1976) Strafgesetzbuch, Kommentar. Munchen, itd: Beck, str. 516, i sl
Skuratov, J.I., Lebedov, V.M. (1996) Kommentarii k Ugolovnomu kodeksu v Rossijskoj Federacii. Moskva: Infra M. Norma, str. 106, i sl
Stojanović, Z.P. (2002) Krivično pravo - opšti deo. Beograd, str. 311
Varinard, A., Joly-Sibuet, E. (1988) Les problèmes juridiques et pratiques posés par la différence antre droit pénal et droit administrative pénal. Revue internationale de droit penal, br. 1-2, str. 194
Viktor, D. (1988) The legal and practical problems posed by the difference between Criminal Law and Administrative Penal Law. Revue internationale de droit penal, br. 1-2, str. 392
Weigend, T. (1988) The legal and practical problems posed by the difference between Criminal Law and Administrative Penal Law. Revue internationale de droit penal, br. 1-2, str. 76 i 77
 

About

article language: Serbian, English
document type: unclassified
published in SCIndeks: 02/06/2007

Related records

No related records