Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:1
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:0

Sadržaj

članak: 4 od 11  
Back povratak na rezultate
2015, br. 4, str. 67-78
Nova strategija proširenja Evropske unije i izveštaji o napretku pojedinačnih država - mogu li biti pokretači promena?
Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd

e-adresaakbojovic@gmail.com
Sažetak
U novembru 2015. godine, Evropska komisija je usvojila novu strategiju proširenja i novu metodologiju u izradi izveštaja o napretku pojedinačnih država. Novine koje donose strategija i izveštaji o napretku imaju za cilj da povećaju transparentnost ovog procesa i istovremeno svim ključnim akterima, a naročito predstavnicima nevladinog sektora, olakšaju vršenje nadzora nad reformskim procesima. Šta ovaj novi pristup podrazumeva i kakve bi se promene mogle očekivati u ponašanju i aktivnostima zakonodavaca i nevladinog sektora u državama koje pristupaju Evropskoj uniji.
Reference
*** (2013) National judicial reform strategy for the 2013-208 period. RS Official Gazette, No. 57
*** (2014) Serbia 2014 progress report. SWD, 302 final, 41
*** (2015) Serbia 2015 report. SWD, 211 final
*** (2013/2014) National judicial reform strategy for the 2013-2018 period implementation action plan. RS Official Gazette, No. 71 and 55 and the Third Draft of the Action Plan for Chapter 23, available at http://www.mpravde.gov.rs/tekst/9664/treci-nacrt-posle-tehnickog-usaglasavanja-sa-komentarima-evropske-komisije.php, a
*** (2015) Communication from The Commission to The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions: EU enlargement strategy. COM, 611 final, hereinafter: 2015 Enlargement Strategy
*** (2014) Decision of the Government of Serbia. No. 02-16383/2014 of December 20
Bruszt, L., Langbein, J. (2014) Anticipatory integration and orchestration: The evolving EU governance of economic and regulatory integration during the Eastern enlargement. u: Paper prepared for the APSA Annual Meeting, Washington, August 28‐31, 12, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=2451961, November 16, 2015
Cavoski, el A. (2005) Pristupanje Državne zajednice Srbija i Crna Gora Evropskoj uniji - iskustva deset novoprimljenih država. Beograd: Institut za uporedno pravo
European Commission (2011) Enlargement strategy and main challenges 2011-2012. COM, 666 final
European council Conclusions of the presidency. Copenhagen, For more information, see http:// www.consilium.europa. eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/72921.pdf
Fagan, A., Sircar, I. (2015) Judicial independence in the Western Balkans: Is the EU's 'new approach' changing judicial practices?. No. 11, June, http://www.maxcap-project.eu/system/files/maxcap_wp_11.pdf, 9, November 13, 2015
Knežević-Bojović, A. (2015) Učešće civilnog sektora u procesu pridruživanja Evropskoj uniji i praksa nacionalnog konventa o EU. Strani pravni život, br. 2, str. 131-144
Nechev, Z., i dr. (2013) Embedding rule of law in the enlargement process: A case for EU political conditionality in the accession of the Western Balkan countries. www.kas.de/wf/doc/kas_36352-1522-1-30.pdf
Rakic-Vodinelic, V., Bojovic, K.A., Reljanovic, M. (2012) Judicial reform in Serbia 2008-2012. Belgrade: CUPS
Schimmelfennig, F., Sedelmeier, U. (2004) Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4): 661-679
Vachudova, M.A., Spenzharoda, A. (2012) The EU's cooperation and verification mechanism: Fighting corruption in Bulgaria and Romania after EU accession. Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, 1, www.sieps.se/sites/default/files/2012_1epa%20EN_A4.pdf, 2
Vucic Serbia climbs 32 positions in WB rankings. http://www.tanjug.rs/full-view_en.aspx?izb=209983, accessed on November 16, 2015
 

O članku

jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: izvorni naučni članak
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 04.07.2016.