Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:7
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:4

Contents

article: 4 from 21  
Back back to result list
2018, iss. 160, pp. 178-192
Culture and democracy: Clearification of concepts
Institute for Educational Research, Belgrade
Keywords: culture; art; democracy; antidemocracy; freedom; audience
Abstract
This paper deals with the conceptual and historical relationship between culture and (non) democracy. The notion of culture is understood in the wider (way of the whole life of one nation) and narrower (artistic­ creative) sense. As a system that does not prevent freedom of thought, creation and action, democracy represents the expansion of freedom in the artistic field of culture. In every system of public authorities and social relations, culture and art face certain challenges. The search for an art form, which by definition is an artistic gift, is often caught in grip of judicial obstacles. In non­democratic systems, the artist responds with his work to the external pressure of power. The political framework is a challenge for his/her creativity. In democratic societies and countries, the artist and his/her work face the mediators, which are cultural-market organizations and private and public institutions that do (or do not) open up a way to audiences. These brokers have the opportunity to accept or not accept artistic work for reasons of aesthetic judgement, market success or dislike towards the author. Also, the tastes of artistic audiences are different, so they can accept or protest against an artwork. The latest phenomenon is a democratization of culture in digital technology. The experience of cultural and artistic creativity in these two forms of public authority and social relations shows that art, as part of the cultural segment of a society, is not offered a safe haven but constant excitement, being caught in the relations among artist­work-audience-states. In that sense, one must always bear in mind that the democratization of culture can well take place in the institutional field, but not in the creative one. Great creators and their works do not produce any system of public authority, but offer their gift, talent, motivation, imagination and knowledge.
References
Avramović, Z. (2008) Sociologija i književnost. Beograd: Raška škola
Avramović, Z. (2013) Ogledi iz kulture i književnosti. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike
Avramović, Z. (2016) Književnici i politika u srpskoj kulturi (1804-2014). Novi Sad: Pravoslavna reč
Avramović, Z. (1998) Drugo lice demokratije. Beograd: Filip Višnjić
Avramović, Z. (2006) Kultura. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike
de Tokvil, A. (1990) Demokratija u Americi. Sremski Karlovci: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića
Kelner, D. (2004) Medijska kultura. Beograd: Clio
Kin, Dž. (1995) Mediji i demokratija. Beograd: Filip Višnjić
Maksić, S. (1993) Kako prepoznati darovitog učenika. Beograd: Institut za pedagoška istraživanja
Špengler, O. (1989) Propast Zapada. Beograd
Zurovac, M. (2005) Tri lica lepote. Beograd: Službeni glasnik
 

About

article language: Serbian
document type: Review Paper
DOI: 10.5937/kultura1860178A
published in SCIndeks: 06/12/2018

Related records

No related records