- citati u SCIndeksu: [1]
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:2
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:0
|
|
2015, br. 146, str. 11-25
|
Političnost studija kulture - putevi i stranputice
Political aspect of culture studies: Ways and sideways
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet političkih nauka, Srbija
Sažetak
Ovaj rad polazi od pretpostavke da su Studije kulture impregnirane političnošću. Prate se osnovne teorijske pretpostavke Studija kulture čija je prvobitna uloga bila da se pronađu nova interpretativna sredstva i metodologije da bi velike promene u društvu i kulturi od '60-tih godina prošlog veka mogle da se tumače na nov način. U opreci prema elitističkim koncepcijama kulture one teže da demokratizuju shvatanja kulture običnog čoveka, sprovedu višedimenzionalnu kritiku kulture kapitalizma rukovodeći se levičarskim idejama i iskustvima. Cilj je bio da se mimo zvaničnih institucija otvore novi putevi za obrazovanje javnih intelektualaca. Pod snažnim uticajem postmodernizma i odgovarajućih teorija, one postaju zagovornici radikalnog kulturalizma, i, paradoksalno, talac globalizma i ideologije neoliberalizma. Rad prati koncepte i ideje na koje se studije kulture oslanjaju dovodeći do ove transformacije.
Abstract
This paper proceeds from an assumption that culture studies are impregnated with political meaning. It examines basic theoretical presumptions of culture studies whose original role was to discover new means of interpretation and methodologies in order to explain the big changes in the society and culture in the 1960ies. Opposed to the elitist culture concepts, they aim to democratize the understanding of culture by the common man, carry out a multidimensional criticism of the capitalist culture starting from leftist ideas and experiences. The aim was to pave new ways for education of 'public intellectuals' outside official institutions. Under strong influence of post modernism and related theories, they have advocated radical culturalism and, paradoxically, became hostage to globalism and neoliberal ideologies. This study examines the concepts and ideas that culture studies relied on, leading to such transformation.
|
|
|
Reference
|
1
|
Badiju, A. (2013) Buđenje istorije. Beograd: Univerzitet Singidunum-Fakultet za medije i komunikacije
|
2
|
Couldry, N. (2010) Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. London: Sage
|
|
Edwards, D. (2010) Guardians of power: The myth of the liberal media. u: Eliot J., Attrige D. [ur.] Theory after Theory, London: Pluto Press
|
|
Ferguson, M., Golding, P. (1997) Cultural studies in question. London: SAGE publications
|
|
Gregg, M., Seigworth, G. (2010) The affect theory reader. North Carolina: Duke University Press
|
|
Hall, G., Birchall, C. (2006) New cultural studies: Adventures in theory. Edinburgh University Press
|
|
Hil, Dž., Poter, E. (2011) Prodaja pobunjenika. Beograd: Hedone
|
|
Hill, R. (2012) Is Resistance Futile?: Cultural Studies at the Zenith of Neoliberalism. American Quarterly, 64(2): 345-356
|
|
Lal, V., Nandi, A. (2012) Predgovor. u: Lal V., Nandi A. [ur.] Budućnost znanja i kulture, Beograd: Klio
|
|
Massoumi, B. (2002) Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. North Carolina: Duke University Press
|
|
Mouffe, C., Laclau, E. (1985) Hegemony and socialist strategy, towards radical democracy and politics. London: Verso
|
|
Ramadžu, R.A. (2012) Zapad. u: Lal V., Nandi A. [ur.] Budućnost znanja i kulture, Beograd: Klio
|
|
Samuels, R. (2010) New media, cultural studies and critical theory after postmodernism: Automodernity from Zizek to Laclau. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
|
|
Sayre, H. (1989) The object of performance: American Avant-garde since 1970. University of Chicago Press
|
|
|
|