• citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:3
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:1


article: 4 from 28  
Back back to result list
2019, vol. 35, iss. 80, pp. 1956-1969
Comparison of surface roughness of dental materials as an adhesion factor of oral biofilm
aUniveristy of Niš, Faculty of Medicine, Clinic of Stomatology + Univeristy of Niš, Faculty of Medicine
bUniverzitet u Nišu, Medicinski fakultet, Institut za javno zdravlje, Niš
cUniveristy of Niš, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
dUniveristy of Niš, Faculty of Medicine
eUniveristy of Niš, Faculty of Medicine, Clinic of Stomatology
Introduction: In order for a material to be considered biologically acceptable, it is necessary to have such a surface design that it reacts as little as possible with tissue and environmental agents. No processing method can produce a molecularly flat surface of dental materials. The aim: of the study was to examine the roughness of various dental materials, using a mechanical profilometer. Material and methods: The test included different materials such as composite, hot polymerized acrylate, cold polymerized acrylates used in prosthetics and orthodontics, zirconium oxide ceramics and glass-ceramics. Samples of the research materials were made according to the manufacturer's instructions. The measurement of the roughness of the obtained samples was performed using a Mitutoyo SJ-301 Suftest device, dragging the reader across the samples, in two directions (vertical and horizontal), thus obtaining two measurement values for each material individually. Results: By measuring the roughness of the material, it was found that there were significant differences between the samples tested. The highest roughness was measured for cold polymerized acrylates used in prosthetics, while the lowest roughness was measured for composite materials. Conclusion: The roughness was significantly higher for cold polymerized acrylates than the other tested materials and should, wherever possible, be replaced by hot polymerized acrylates. In order to reduce the roughness of dental materials, the principles of their preparation and in particular the surface treatment (polishing and glazing process) should be followed.
Alves, P.V., i dr. (2007) Surface roughness of acrylic resins after different curing and polishing techniques. Angle Orthodontist, 77; 528-531
Beyth, N., Bahir, R., Matalon, S., Domb, A.J., Weiss, E.I. (2008) Streptococcus mutans biofilm changes surface-topography of resin composites. Dental Materials, 24(6); 732-736
Bhushan, B. (2001) Surface roughness analysis and measurement techniques. CH02.pdf
Bollen, C.M., Lambrechts, P., Quirynen, M. (1997) Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature. Dent Mater, 13(4); 258-69
Bona, D.A., Pecho, O.E., Alessandretti, R. (2015) Zirconia as a dental biomaterial. Materials, 8; 4978-4991
Bremer, F., Grade, S., Kohorst, P., Stiesch, M. (2011) In vivo biofilm formation on different dental ceramics. Quintessence Int, 42; 565-574
Ferracane, J.L. (2011) Resin composite: State of the art. Dent Mater, 27; 29-38
Frazer, R.Q., Byron, R.T., Osborne, P.B., West, K.P. (2005) PMMA: An essential material in medicine and dentistry. J Long Term Eff Med Implants, 15(6); str. 629-639
Gendreau, L., Loewy, Z.G. (2011) Epidemiology and etiology of denture stomatitis. Journal of Prosthodontics, 20(4); 251-260
Hanks, C.T., Watacha, J.C., Sun, Z. (1996) In vitro models of biocompatibility: A review. Dent Mater, 12; 186-193
Kawai, K., Urano, M. (2001) Adherence of plaque components to different restorative materials. Oper Dent, 26; 396-400
Kawai, K., Urano, M., Ebisu, S. (2000) Effect of surface roughness of porcelain on adhesion of bacteria and their synthesizing glucans. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 83(6); 664-667
Kirmali, O. (2012) Dental ceramics used in dentistry. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, 17; 316-324
Konoshi, N., Torii, Y., Kurosaki, A., Takatsuka, T., Itota, T., Yoshiyama, M. (2003) Confocal laser scanning microscopic analysis of early plaque formed on resin composite and human enamel. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 30(8); 790-795
Lindh, L. (2002) On the adsorption behaviour of saliva and purified salivary proteins at solid/liquid interfaces. Swed Dent J Suppl, (152);1-57
Lloyd, C.H., Scrimgeour, N. (1997) Dental materials: 1995 literature review. J Dent, 25; 173-208
Mei, L., Busscher, H.J., van der Mei, H.C., Ren, Y. (2011) Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins. Dental Materials, 27(8); 770-778
Nevzatoglu, E.U., Ozcan, M., Kulak-Ozkan, Y., Kadir, T. (1997) Adherence of Candida albicans to denture base acrylics and silicone-based resilient liner materials with different surface finishes. Int J Prosthodont, 10(5); 473-477
Park, M.S., Chung, J.W., Kim, Y.K., Chung, S.C., Kho, H.S. (2007) Viscosity and wettability of animal mucin solutions and human saliva. Oral Dis, 13(2); 181-6
Persson, A., Claesson, R., van Dijken, J.W. (2005) Levels of mutans streptococci and lactobacilli in plaque on aged restorations of an ion-releasing and a universal hybrid composite resin. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 63(1); 21-25
Radford, D.R., Sweet, S.P., Challacombe, S.J., Walter, J.D. (1998) Adherence of Candida albicans to denture-base materials with different surface finishes. J Dent, 26(7); 577-583
Rashid, H. (2014) The effect of surface roughness on ceramics used in dentistry: A review of literature. European Journal of Dentistry, 8(4); 571-579
Rashid, H. (2012) Comparing glazed and polished ceramic surfaces using confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Adv Microscop Res, 7(3); 208-213
Salerno, C., i dr. (2011) Candida-associated denture stomatitis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 16; e139-43
Shulev, A., Roussev, I., Karpuzov, S., Stoilov, G., Ignatova, D. (2016) Roughness measurement of dental materials. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Sofia, 46; pp. 27-36
Sousa, R.P., Zanin, I.C., Lima, J.P., Vasconcelos, S.M., Melo, M.A., Beltrão, H.C. (2009) In situ effects of restorative materials on dental biofilm and enamel demineralisation. Journal of Dentistry, 37(1); 44-51
Yamauchi, M., Yamamoto, K., Wakabayashi, M., Kawano, J. (1990) In vitro adherence of microorganisms to denture base resin with different surface texture. Dent Mater Journal, 9; 19-24
Zamperini, C.A., Machado, A.L., Vergani, C.E., Pavarina, A.C., Giampaolo, E.T., da Cruz, N.C. (2010) Adherence in vitro of Candida albicans to plasma treated acrylic resin: Effect of plasma parameters, surface roughness and salivary pellicle. Archives of Oral Biology, 55(10); 763-770
Zissis, A.J., Polyzois, G.L., Yannikakis, S.A., Harrison, A. (2000) Roughness of denture materials: A comparative study. Int J Prosthodont, 13(2); 136-140


article language: English, Serbian
document type: Original Paper
DOI: 10.5937/asn1980956S
published in SCIndeks: 18/02/2020
Creative Commons License 4.0

Related records

Acta stomatologica Naissi (2014)
Examination of adherence of dental acrylic polymers in vivo
Kostić Milena, et al.

Acta stomatologica Naissi (2018)
Biofilm formation on dental materials
Stanković-Pešić Jana, et al.

Vojnosanitetski pregled (2015)
Artificial saliva effect on toxic substances release from acrylic resins
Kostić Milena, et al.

show all [23]