kako citirati ovaj članak
podeli ovaj članak


  • citati u SCIndeksu: [3]
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:9
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:1


članak: 2 od 28  
Back povratak na rezultate
2018, vol. 65, br. 3, str. 319-337
Institutionalist versus neoclassical view on income distribution and economic progress: The OECD panel evidence
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Ekonomski fakultet, Subotica

e-adresajosifidis@gmail.com, novicasupic@yahoo.com
Ključne reči: income inequality; savings; economic progress; old institutionalism; neoclassical economics
(ne postoji na srpskom)
Institutionalist and neoclassical views on income distribution are characterized by different assumptions about the inequality - savings - economic progress relationship. By questioning the neoclassical arguments, the paper promotes the attitude that economic progress results not from savings as 'abstain from current consumption' but from society's ability to continuously develop technological arts and crafts. Empirical analysis of panel data from OECD countries using a dynamic GMM model shows a positive relationship between income concentration and aggregate savings, but there is no robust evidence of a positive relationship between aggregate savings and economic progress. Furthermore, we find robust evidence that technology and human capital are the key determinants of economic progress, implying that accumulation of physical and human capital is more important for economic progress than accumulation of financial capital.
Alessie, R., Lusardi, A. (1997) Consumption, saving and habit formation. Economics Letters, 55(1): 103-108
Araujo, R.A. (2013) Cumulative causation in a structural economic dynamic approach to economic growth and uneven development. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 24: 130-140
Arellano, M., Bover, O. (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1): 29-51
Arellano, M., Bond, S. (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297
Arestis, P., Gonzalez-Martinez, A. (2016) Income inequality: Implications and relevant economic policies. Panoeconomicus, vol. 63, br. 1, str. 1-24
Ayres, C.E. (1944) Theory of Economic Progress. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press
Ayres, C.E. (1946) The divine right of capital. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin
Blundell, R., Bond, S. (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1): 115-143
Bowles, S., Park, Y. (2005) Emulation, Inequality, and Work Hours: Was Thorsten Veblen Right?*. Economic Journal, 115(507): F397-F412
Brown, C. (2005) Is There an Institutional Theory of Distribution?. Journal of Economic Issues, 39(4): 915-931
Chowdhury, A. (2015) Terms of trade shocks and private savings in the developing countries. Journal of Comparative Economics, 43(4): 1122-1134
Clark, C.M.A., Kavanagh, C. (1996) Basic Income, Inequality, and Unemployment: Rethinking the Linkage between Work and Welfare. Journal of Economic Issues, 30(2): 399-406
Clark, C.M.A. (2003) Promoting Economic Equity: The Basic Income Approach. u: Tool, Marc R.; Bush, Paul Dale [ur.] Institutional Analysis and Economic Policy, Boston, MA: Springer Nature, str. 133-156
Commons, J.R. (1950) The Economics of Collective Action. New York: Macmillan
Cooper, D., McCausland, W. D., Theodossiou, I. (2013) Income Inequality and Wellbeing: The Plight of the Poor and the Curse of Permanent Inequality. Journal of Economic Issues, 47(4): 939-958
Corneo, G., Jeanne, O. (1999) Pecuniary emulation, inequality and growth. European Economic Review, 43(9): 1665-1678
de Dominicis, L., Florax, R.J.G.M., de Groot, H.L.F. (2008) A meta-analysis on the relationship between income inequality and economic growth. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 55(5): 654-682
Doug, H. (2016) Getting centered and standardized coefficients right. http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~hemken/Stataworkshops/stdBeta/Getting%20Standardized%20Coefficients%20Right.pdf
Dutt, A.K. (2017) Heterodox theories of economic growth and income distribution: a partial survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(5): 1240-1271
Foellmi, R., Zweimüller, J. (2017) Is inequality harmful for innovation and growth? Price versus market size effects. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 27(2): 359-378
Frank, R.H., Levine, A.S., Dijk, O. (2014) Expenditure cascades. Review of Behavioral Economics, 1(1-2): 55-73.
Galbraith,, Kenneth, J. (1977) The Affluent Society. London: Andre Deutsch
Galbraith, J.K. (1967) The new industrial state. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
Garegnani, P. (1970) Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function and the Theory of Distribution. Review of Economic Studies, 37(3): 407
Gilens, M. (2012) Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation
Gordon, W.C. (1973) Economics from an Institutional Viewpoint. Austin: University Stores
Green, F. (1991) Institutional and Other Unconventional Theories of Saving. Journal of Economic Issues, 25(1): 93-113
Harcourt, G.C. (2015) On the Cambridge, England, Critique of the Marginal Productivity Theory of Distribution. Review of Radical Political Economics, 47(2): 243-255
Hayes, G.H. (1946) Spending, saving, and employment. Science and Society, 10(4): 410-412
Hwang, S., Lee, J. (2017) Conspicuous consumption and income inequality. Oxford Economic Papers, str. gpw060
John, B.C. (1899/2013) The distribution of wealth: A theory of wages, interest and profits. Alabama: Ludwig von Mises Institute
John, K.G. (2001) The distribution of income. u: Holt Richard P.F., Pressman Steven [ur.] A New Guide to Post Keynesian Economics, London: Routledge, 32-42
Josifidis, K., Supic, N. (2016) Income Inequality and Workers’ Powerlessness in Selected OECD Countries. Journal of Economic Issues, 50(2): 424-434
Josifidis, K., Supic, N. (2017) The Meritocratic Elite vs. the Common Man: Income Inequality in the Affluent OECD Countries. Journal of Economic Issues, 51(2): 431-439
Josifidis, K., Supić, N., Beker-Pucar, E. (2017) Institutional quality and income inequality in the advanced countries. Panoeconomicus, vol. 64, br. 2, str. 169-188
Kaldor, N. (1955) Alternative Theories of Distribution. Review of Economic Studies, 23(2): 83
Keizer, P., Spithoven, A. (2009) Cultural Foundation of Distribution of Income: The Dutch Case. Journal of Economic Issues, 43(2): 513-522
King, J.E. (2015) Advanced Introduction to Post Keynesian Economics. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing
Krishna, B. (1989) Themes in Value and Distribution: Classical Theory Reappraised. London: Unwin Hyman
Michal, K. (1954) Theory of economic dynamics. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Modigliani, F., Brumberg, R. (1954) Utility analysis and the consumption function: An interpretation of Cross-section data. u: Kurihara Kenneth K. [ur.] Post Keynesian Economics, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 388-436
Neves, P.C., Silva, S.M.T. (2014) Inequality and Growth: Uncovering the Main Conclusions from the Empirics. Journal of Development Studies, 50(1): 1-21
Neves, P.C., Afonso, Ó., Silva, S.T. (2016) A Meta-Analytic Reassessment of the Effects of Inequality on Growth. World Development, 78: 386-400
Oded, G. (2009) Inequality and economic development: An overview. u: Brown University Department of Economics Working Paper 3
Okun, A. (1975) Equity and Efficiency: The Big Trade-Off. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press
Palley, T.I. (2017) Inequality and growth in neo-Kaleckian and Cambridge growth theory. Review of Keynesian Economics, 5(2): 146-169
Park, K.H. (1996) Income Inequality and Economic Progress. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 55(1): 87-96
Pasinetti, L.L. (1969) Switches of Technique and the 'Rate of Return' in Capital Theory. Economic Journal, 79(315): 508
Peach, J.T. (1987) Distribution and Economic Progress. Journal of Economic Issues, 21(4): 1495-1529
Piketty, T., Saez, E. (2006) The Evolution of Top Incomes: A Historical and International Perspective. American Economic Review, 96(2): 200-205
Piketty, T. (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press
Robinson, J. (1959) Accumulation and the Production Function. Economic Journal, 69(275): 433
Rodriguez, C.B. (2000) An Empirical Test of the Institutionalist View on Income Inequality Economic Growth within the United States. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 59(2): 303-313
Setterfield, M., Kurz, H.D., Salvadori, N. (2010) The Post-Keynesian Theories of Growth and Distribution: A Survey. u: Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth, Edward Elgar Publishing
Sraffa, P. (1960) Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Stanfield, J.R. (1999) The Scope, Method, and Significance of Original Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 33(2): 231-255
Stiglitz, J.E. (2012) The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers the Future. New York: W. W. Norton
Stockhammer, E., Wildauer, R. (2015) Debt-driven growth? Wealth, distribution and demand in OECD countries. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(6): 1609-1634
Stockman, D.A. (2013) The Great Deformation: The Corruption of Capitalism in America. New York: Public Affairs Press
van Lear, W. (2016) The Capital-to-Income Ratio: Thoughts Engendered by the Work of Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez. Journal of Economic Issues, 50(4): 1131-1144
van Treeck, T. (2015) Inequality, the crisis, and stagnation. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 12(2): 158-169
Veblen, T. (1899/2009) The theory of the leisure class. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Veblen, T. (1919/2014) The vested interest and the common man. Eastford: Martino Fine Books
Vickers, D. (1995) The Monetary and the Real: Sectoral Interdependence and Market Outcomes. u: Wells, Paul [ur.] Post-Keynesian Economic Theory, Boston, MA: Springer Nature, str. 49-72
Wade, R.H. (2014) The piketty phenomenon and the future of inequality. Real-World Economics Review, 69(4): 2-17
Watkins, J.P. (2009) Corporate Profits and Personal Misery: Credit, Gender, and the Distribution of Income. Journal of Economic Issues, 43(2): 413-422
Windmeijer, F. (2005) A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126(1): 25-51
Wisman, J.D. (2017) Politics, Not Economics, Ultimately Drives Inequality. Challenge, 60(4): 347-367

O članku

jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: izvorni naučni članak
DOI: 10.2298/PAN1803319J
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 13.07.2018.
Creative Commons License 4.0