Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:0
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:0

Sadržaj

članak: 2 od 4  
Back povratak na rezultate
2006, vol. 56, br. 2, str. 1-8
Prikaz softverske podrške za izbor novog proizvoda
aUniverzitet u Novom Sadu, Tehnički fakultet 'Mihajlo Pupin', Zrenjanin
b'Metro Cash and Carry' d.o.o., Beograd
Ključne reči: softverska podrška; izbor novih proizvoda; višekriterijumska analiza; prehrambena industrija
Sažetak
U radu su predstavljene osnovne karakteristike i prednosti softvera koji podržava postupak izbora novog proizvoda. Izbor novog proizvoda ovde se vrši prema originalnom modelu višekriterijumske analize. Takođe, softver uzima u obzir rezultate istraživanja relativnog značaja kriterijuma za izbor novog proizvoda. Istraživanje je izvršeno za prehrambenu industriju Srbije i Crne Gore, pa tako ovde izloženi softver, prvenstveno ima značaj za ovu granu industrije. Softver obezbeđuje bržu, efikasniju i pouzdaniju realizaciju svih potrebnih proračuna, koji su, u ovom slučaju, veoma obimni. Softver daje bolju preglednost i veću objektivnost unosa potrebnih podataka, čime se čitav postupak približava samim korisnicima. Jedna od najznačajnijih osobina softvera je to što se može pratiti stabilnost izlaza u zavisnosti od variranja pojedinih ulaznih veličina. Naime, izmena bilo kog ulaznog parametra automatski se uzima u obzir i odražava na izlazne rezultate (rangovi alternativa za nove proizvode). Primena softvera u praktičnim uslovima pokazala se kao opravdana i veoma korisna.
Reference
Brans, J.P., Mareschal, B., Vincke, P. (1984) A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis. u: Brans J.P. [ur.] Operational Research, Amsterdam: North-Holland
Cooper, R.G., Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1987) Success factors in product innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 16, Issue 3, str. 215-223
Cooper, R.G., Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1987) New products: What separates winners from losers. Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 4, Issue 3, str. 169-184
Enea, M., Piazza, T. (2004) Project selection by constrained fuzzy AHP. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, vol. 3, br. 1, str. 39-62
Farinwata, Sh.S., Filev, D., Langari, R., ur. (2000) Fuzzy control: Synthesis and analysis. New York, itd: Wiley
Henard, D.H., Szymanski, D.M. (2001) Why some new products are more successful than others. Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 38, Issue 3
Hoppner, F., Klawonn, F., Kruse, R., Runkler, T. (1999) Fuzzy cluster analysis. New York, itd: Wiley
Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.S. (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Berlin, itd: Springer Verlag
Laininen, P., Hamalainen, R.P. (2003) Analyzing AHP-matrices by regression. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 148, Issue 3, str. 514-524
Larichev, O.I., Kortnev, A.V., Kochin, D. (2002) Decision support system for classification of a finite set of multicriteria alternatives. Decision Support Systems, vol. 33, Issue 1, str. 13-21
Leskinen, P. (2000) Measurement, scales and scale independence in the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 9, br. 4, str. 163-174
Montoya-Weiss, M.M., Calantone, R. (1987) Determinants of new products performance: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 4, Issue 3, str. 169-184
Nikolić, M. (2004) Quantitative model for selecting a new product with research into relevant criteria. Belgrade: Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, PhD thesis
Nikolić, M., Sajfert, Z. (2004) Widening of Saati's scale for comparison of criteria in pairs. u: 4th International Symposium On Intelligent Manufacturing Systems IMS' 2004, Sakarya, str. 155-165
Nikolić, M., Sajfert, Z., Nikolić, B. (2005) An alternative criteria research methodology for selecting a new product. Organizacija, vol. 38, Issue 9, November, str. 543-553
Nikolić, M., Sajfert, Z., Klarin, M. (2005) Kvantitativni model više-kriterijumske analize baziran na metodama AHP i PROMETHEE. Management - časopis za teoriju i praksu menadžmenta, vol. 10, br. 39, str. 39-50
Noghin, V.D. (1997) Relative importance of criteria: A quantitative approach. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 6, br. 6, str. 355-363
Parry, M.E., Song, X.M. (1994) Identifying new product successes in China. Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 11, Issue 1, str. 15-30
Pedrycz, W., Gomide, F. (1998) An introduction to fuzzy sets: Analysis and design. Cambridge: Bradford Book
Podinovski, V.V. (2002) The quantitative importance of criteria for MCDA. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 11, br. 1, str. 1-15
Royo, A.S., Verdegay, J.L. (2000) Coherence measures on finite fuzzy sets. International Journal of Uncertainly, Fuzziness and Knowledg-Based Systems, vol. 8, br. 6, 641-663
Saaty, T.L. (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. New York, itd: McGraw-Hill
Song, X.M., Sounder, W.E., Dyer, B. (1997) A causal model of the impact of skills, synergy and design sensitivity on new product performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 14, Issue 2, str. 88-101
Triantaphillou, E. (2000) Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study. Dordrecht, itd: Kluwer
Yager, R.R. (1995) Fuzzy logic in control. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology, PhD. thesis
 

O članku

jezik rada: srpski
vrsta rada: izvorni naučni članak
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 02.06.2007.

Povezani članci

Nema povezanih članaka