Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:1
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:0

Contents

article: 9 from 89  
Back back to result list
2018, vol. 13, iss. 2, pp. 25-39
Experience of judicial systems of 'new' EU economies and Serbia towards EU Standard 23
Visoka ekonomska škola strukovnih studija Peć, Leposavić

emailmatovic.ana@gmail.com
Keywords: monitoring; justice; standard 23; system; European Union
Abstract
EU chapter 23 is a major challenge for Serbia but also 'new' EU Bulgaria and Romania that are in the process of monitoring, even though they became members of the EU back in 2007. Chapter 23 is some what new, introduced after the fifth and sixth enlargement wave of the European Union in 2004 and 2007. Previously, there was a chapter in the field of justice and internal affairs, which was separated in the case of the Croatian accession negotiations. The aim of this presentation is to highlight the individual experience of 'new' EU economies in creating a system that would enable an effective implementation of the law, reduce the backlog of cases, determine a clear number of holders of judicial functions and thereby strengthened the legal security of citizens.
References
*** (2016) EU 2016 Justice Scoreboard: Bulgarians with Lowest Levels of Faith in Convicting Corrupt Officials. Anti-corruption newsletter, 30 (May), Dostupno na internet strani: Seldi.Net
*** Justice and Home Affairs discussed at EU-Western Balkans Ministerial Forum. podaci i informacije dostupni: www.roc.int/news/243/justice - and-home-affairs-discussed, dostupno dana 31.12.2016
*** Rumunska pravosudna reforma - studija slučaja za buduće članice EU. Podaci i informacije preuzeti sa sajta http-//www.euractiv.com/section/central.europe/news/ro manias/judici, dostupno dana 25.12.2016. godine, Podaci preuzeti iz studije Andrei Schwartz, Peopleis Pala
*** Hrvatsko pravosuđe i dalje pri dnu EU, a imamo dvostruko više sudaca od Austrije. podaci i informacije dostupni na adresi http //www.vecernji.hr/hrvatsk a/hrvatsko-pravosuđe-dalje-pridnire. dostupno dana 2.1.2017. godine. Podaci preuzeti iz analize Evropske komisije EU za 2014. god
Evropska komisija za efikasnost pravosuđa (CEPEJ) (2016) Evropski pravosudni sistemi - izveštaj CEPEJ. 23, 8, podaci su dostupni na adresi http://www.coe.int/cepe
Fagan, A. (2017) Judical reform in Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina: Is EU Support and Assistance Augmenting Independence?. in: Bez radikalne reforme pravosuđa nema izlaza iz višeslojne krize, Berlin: Freie Universitat Berlin, N24, Podaci i informacije dostupni na adresi http://creative.net/?-p=54338, dostupno dana 1.1.2017. godine
Pring, C. (2016) People and corruption: Europe and Central Asia: Barometar Corruption. Brisel: European Commission, November, 8
Reljanović, M., Knežević, B.A. (2014) Pravni zapisi. Beograd: Univerzitet Union - Pravni fakultet, (Vol. 1) 243
Stoica, F. (2016) The evolution of Romanian judical system seen through the last monitoring report. Challenges of the Knowledge Society, Bucharest, Public law, Nicolae Titulescu University of Bucharest, (Vol.6) 497-502
World Bank (2015) Serbia's Judicial System Needs to Address Under-Performance, says World Bank. podaci i informacije dostupni na adresi http-//www.worldbank.org/en/N EWS/press/release/2015/02/03/serbia-j. February 3. 2015, dostupno dana 25.12.2016
 

About

article language: Serbian
document type: Review Paper
DOI: 10.5937/ekonsig1802025M
published in SCIndeks: 04/06/2019
Creative Commons License 4.0

Related records

No related records