Akcije

Strategic Management
kako citirati ovaj članak
podeli ovaj članak

Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:[1]
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:15
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:14

Sadržaj

članak: 1 od 51  
Back povratak na rezultate
2019, vol. 24, br. 3, str. 43-54
Indicators of global university rankings: The theoretical issues
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
aUniverzitet u Novom Sadu, Učiteljski fakultet, Sombor
bUniverzitet u Novom Sadu, Ekonomski fakultet, Subotica

e-adresanemanja.lukic@pef.uns.ac.rs
Ključne reči: university; global ranking system; indicators
Sažetak
(ne postoji na srpskom)
The main goal of this paper is to determine the significance of identified university ranking indicators in relation to the overall measurement system of selected global ranking systems. The realisation of the research was divided into two phases. The first phase consists of a systematic overview of the literature that has resulted in the identification of 16 global ranking systems. In the second phase, an empirical analysis of 10 active ranking systems which were selected based on the set criteria. The ranking systems are observed regarding their measurement focus. According to the results of empirical analysis, the research category indicators account for 67.93% of the sum of the weight coefficients in the overall measurement system, followed by the reputation category indicators with 13.5% and the Web performance category indicators with 9.37%. The most significant number of global ranking systems dominantly puts its focus in the context of measuring research performance as the crucial indicator of the quality and competitiveness of universities.
Reference
Aghaei, C.A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., Ale, E.N. (2013) A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5): 18-26
Aguillo, I.F., Bar-Ilan, J., Levene, M., Ortega, J.L. (2010) Comparing university rankings. Scientometrics, 85(1): 243-256
Bolton, C., Machová, V., Kovacova, M., Valaskova, K. (2018) The power of human-machine collaboration: Artificial intelligence, business automation, and the smart economy. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 13(4): 51-56
Bornmann, L., de Moya, A.F. (2014) What proportion of excellent papers makes an institution one of the best worldwide?: Specifying thresholds for the interpretation of the results of the SCImago Institutions Ranking and the Leiden Ranking. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4): 732-736
Buela-Casal, G., Gutiérrez-Martínez, O., Bermúdez-Sánchez, M.P., Vadillo-Muñoz, O. (2007) Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities. Scientometrics, 71(3): 349-365
Çakır, M.P., Acartürk, C., Alaşehir, O., Çilingir, C. (2015) A comparative analysis of global and national university ranking systems. Scientometrics, 103(3): 813-848
Chen, K., Liao, P. (2012) A comparative study on world university rankings: A bibliometric survey. Scientometrics, 92(1): 89-103
Chessell, D. (2018) The jobless economy in a post-work society: How automation will transform the labor market. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 6(2): 74-79
Claassen, C. (2015) Measuring university quality. Scientometrics, 104(3): 793-807, April
Delgado-Márquez, B.L., Hurtado-Torres, N.E., Bondar, Y. (2011) Internationalization of higher education: Theoretical and empirical investigation of its influence on university institution rankings. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad Del Conocimiento (RUSC) / Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 8(2): 265-284
Dill, D.D., Soo, M. (2005) Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems. Higher Education, 49(4): 495-533
Grossman, T. (2018) The rise of an automated jobless society: Do cutting-edge technologies expel workers swifter than the economy can identify new jobs for them?. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 6(2): 62-67
Huang, M.-H. (2011) A comparison of three major academic rankings for world universities: From a research evaluation perspective. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 9(1): 1-25
Khosrowjerdi, M., Kashani, Z.S. (2013) Asian top universities in six world university ranking systems. Webology, 10(2): 1-9, http://www.webology.org/2013/v10n2/a114.pdf, retrieved April, 18, 2019
Kitchenham, B. (2004) Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK: Keele University, 33; 1-26, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d36f/e9d7839596d58fa008121db57dc7cadda338.pdf, retrieved April, 18, 2019
Kitchenham, B., Pearl, B.O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., Linkman, S. (2009) Systematic literature reviews in software engineering: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1): 7-15
Kivinen, O., Hedman, J., Artukka, K. (2017) Scientific publishing and global university rankings: How well are top publishing universities recognized?. Scientometrics, 112(1): 679-695
Kofod-Petersen, A. (2014) How to do a structured literature review in computer science. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265158913_How_to_do_a_Structured_Literature_Review_in_computer_science, retrieved April, 18, 2019
Marginson, S. (2014) University rankings and social science. European Journal of Education, 49(1): 45-59
Millot, B. (2015) International rankings: Universities vs. higher education systems. International Journal of Educational Development, 40: 156-165
Moed, H.F. (2017) A critical comparative analysis of five world university rankings. Scientometrics, 110(2): 967-990
Olcay, G.A., Bulu, M. (2017) Is measuring the knowledge creation of universities possible?: A review of university rankings. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123: 153-160
Shehatta, I., Mahmood, K. (2016) Correlation among top 100 universities in the major six global rankings: Policy implications. Scientometrics, 109(2): 1231-1254
Soh, K. (2015) What the Overall doesn't tell about world university rankings: Examples from ARWU, QSWUR, and THEWUR in 2013. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(3): 295-307
Usher, A., Savino, M. (2007) A global survey of university ranking and league tables. Higher Education in Europe, 32(1): 5-15
van Vught, F.A., Westerheijden, D.F. (2010) Multidimensional ranking: A new transparency tool for higher education and research. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22 (3), 1-26
Vernon, M.M., Andrew, B.E., Momani, S. (2018) Are university rankings useful to improve research?: A systematic review. PLoS One, 13(3): 1-15
Waltman, L., Calero-Medina, C., Kosten, J., Noyons, E.C.M., Tijssen, R.J.W., van Eck, N.J., van Leeuwen, T.N., van Raan, A.F.J., Visser, M.S., Wouters, P. (2012) The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12): 2419-2432
 

O članku

jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: neklasifikovan
DOI: 10.5937/StraMan1903043L
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 15.10.2019.