Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:10
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:6

Sadržaj

članak: 1 od 6  
Back povratak na rezultate
2021, vol. 76, br. 3, str. 379-385
Višekriterijumska ocena obnovljivih izvora energije u Srbiji
aAcademy of Professional Studies Kosovo and Metohija, Leposavić
bUniverzitet u Kragujevcu, Fakultet inženjerskih nauka

e-adresabojan.stojcetovic@akademijakm.edu.rs
Ključne reči: OIE; AHP; PV; vetar; hidro; biomasa
Sažetak
Razvoj današnjih ekonomija nezamisliv je bez energije. Međutim, rezerve fosilnih goriva se smanjuju, klimatske promene se ubrzavaju i potrebne su određene promene u energetskom sektoru. Obnovljivi izvori energije su potencijalno rešenje za mnoge naučnike i praktičare. Međutim, planiranje i realizacija projekata obnovljivih izvora energije zahteva razmatranje brojnih kriterijuma, zbog čega se višekriterijumske metode odlučivanja često koriste za procenu obnovljivih izvora energije/tehnologija. Cilj ovog rada je procena četiri vrste obnovljivih izvora energije (fotonaponska, hidro, biomasa i energija vetra) u Srbiji. Primenjen je analitički hijerarhijski proces i sedam kriterijuma. Na osnovu dobijenih rezultata, hidro izvori su najbolje rangirani. Takođe je sprovedena analiza osetljivosti da bi se utvrdilo da li bi promene prioriteta kriterijuma prouzrokovale promene u rangu alternativa. Utvrđeno je da su potrebne značajne promene u prioritetima da bi došlo do promena ranga, pa se može zaključiti da su dobijeni rezultati relevantni.
Reference
*** (2015) Strategy for Energy Development of the Republic of Serbia Until 2025 with Projections Until 2030. Official Gazette of RS, 101
*** (2017) Cost-Competitive Renewable Power Generation: Potential across South East Europe, International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). Abu Dhabi: IRENA 2017
*** (2019) Renewables 2019 Global Status Report. Paris: REN21 Secretariat, ISBN 978-3-9818911-7-1
Bogdanović, D., Nikolić, Đ., Ilić, I. (2012) Mining Method Selection by Integrated AHP and PROMETHEE Method. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 84(1), 219-233
Chatzimouratidis, A.I., Pilavachi, P.A. (2009) Sensitivity Analysis of Technological, Economic and Sustainability Evaluation of Power Plants Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Energy Policy, 37(3): 788-798
Chatzimouratidis, A.I., Pilavachi, P.A. (2008) Multicriteria Evaluation of Power Plants Impact on the Living Standard Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Energy Policy, 36(3): 1074-1089
Ervural, B.C., et al. (2018) An ANP and Fuzzy TOPSISbased SWOT Analysis for Turkey's Energy Planning. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82: 1538-1550
Evans, A., Strezov, V., Evans, T.J. (2009) Assessment of Sustainability Indicators for Renewable Energy Technologies. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 13: 1082-1088
Francés, G.E., Marín-Quemada, J.M., González, E.S. (2013) RES and Risk: Renewable Energy's Contribution to Energy Security. Aportfolio-based Approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 26: 549-559
Haddad, B., Liazid, A., Ferreira, P. (2017) A Multi-criteria Approach to Rank Renewables for the Algerian Electricity System. Renewable Energy, 107: 462-472
Hoffmann, W. (2014) The Economic Competitiveness of Renewable Energy: Pathways to 100% Global Coverage. Beverly: Wiley-Scrivener
IEA (2008) World Energy Outlook 2020. Paris, https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2020
IRENA (2019) Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2018. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency
Lee, H.C., Chang, C. (2018) Comparative Analysis of MCDM Methods for Ranking Renewable Energy Sources in Taiwan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 92: 883-896
Lucas, J., Francés, G., González, E. (2016) Energy Security and Renewable Energy Deployment in the EU: Liaisons Dangereuses or Virtuous Circle?. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 62: 1032-1046
Meyer, I., Sommer, M.W. (2014) Employment Effects of Renewable Energy Supply: A Meta Analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 10: 1-29
Nikolić, Đ., Spasić, J., Živković, Ž., Đorđević, P., Mihajlović, I., Kangas, J. (2015) SWOT - AHP model for prioritzation of strategies of the resort Stara Planina. Serbian Journal of Management, vol. 10, br. 2, str. 141-150
REmap (2016) Roadmap for a Renewable Energy Future. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA, www.irena.org/remap
Saaty, T.L. (1990) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications
Saaty, T.L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning. New York: McGraw-Hill
Saaty, T.L. (2000) Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Pittsburg: RWS Publications
Schandl, H., et al. (2016) Decoupling Global Environmental Pressure and Economic Growth: Scenarios for Energy Use, Materials Use and Carbon Emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 132: 45-56
Schramski, J.R., Gattie, D.K., Brown, J.H. (2015) Human Domination of the Biosphere: Rapid Discharge of the Earth-space Battery Foretells the Future of Humankind. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(31): 9511-9517
Stojanović, G., Bogdanović, D., Vuković, M., Stojčetović, B. (2019) Supplier ranking in mining systems in terms of quality: Case study: Public company for underground coal exploitation Resavica. Podzemni radovi, br. 35, str. 1-12
Stojčetović, B., Nikolić, Đ., Jevtić, M., Jakšić, U. (2020) Development and Prioritization of Renewable Energy Scenarios Using Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threat Analysis and Fuzzy Analytical Network Process Methodology. Thermal science, accepted paper
Stojčetović, B., Nikolić, Đ., Velinov, V., Bogdanović, D. (2016) Application of Integrated Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats and Analytic Hierarchy Process Methodology to Renewable Energy Project Selection in Serbia. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 8: 035906-035906
Stojčetović, B., Marković, S., Bogdanović, D. (2020) Renewable energy projects assessment using economic criteria. Ekonomski pogledi, vol. 22, br. 1, str. 15-28
 

O članku

jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: prethodno saopštenje
DOI: 10.5937/tehnika2103379S
primljen: 26.04.2021.
prihvaćen: 14.05.2021.
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 10.07.2021.
Creative Commons License 4.0

Povezani članci

Nema povezanih članaka