- citati u SCIndeksu: [1]
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:6
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:3
|
|
2017, vol. 51, br. 1, str. 81-108
|
Upotreba informaciono-komunikacionih tehnologija u svrhu nadziranja u radnim organizacijama - slučaj Srbije
The use of information and communication technologies for the purposes of surveilance in working organizations: The case of Serbia
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Saobraćajni fakultet, Srbija
Sažetak
Predmet izučavanja ovog rada čine savremene tehnologije nadzora koje se primenjuju u radnim organizacijama (RO), kako u svetu tako i u Srbiji. Eksplozivan razvoj informaciono-komunikacionih tehnologija (IKT) omogućio je poslodavcima, pre toga nezabeležene, mogućnosti nadzora nad zaposlenima u RO. U skladu sa tim, osnovna pitanja koja pokreću kroz ovaj rad su, prvo, u kojoj meri i na koji način savremene tehnologije nadzora 'omoćavaju' poslodavce kao vlasnike kompletnog procesa stvaranja kapitala i drugo, da li se njihovom upotrebom konačno ostvaruje davnašnja želja kapitalista da se radna snaga svede jednu u nizu lako predvidljivih komponenti radnog procesa. Pored definisanja teorijskog okvira teme i analize različitih aspekata nadzora u RO sprovedeno je i empirijsko istraživanje u vidu 15 dubinskih intervjua sa zaposlenima u različitim tipovima RO. Rezultati istraživanja i prethodno sprovedena analiza pokazuju da je praksa nadzora široko rasprostranjena kako u inostranim tako i u srpskim RO a da zaposleni, uz sporadične strategije otpora, u najvećoj meri prihvataju nadzor 'zdravo za gotovo' bez preterano razvijene svesti o narušavanju njihovih radničkih ili ljudskih prava. PR Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. 36022.
Abstract
This paper deals with the use of information and communication technologies for the purposes of surveillance in working organizations in general and in Serbia as well. Until now, explosive development of information and communication technologies provided unprecedented possibilities for employee's surveillance. In line with that, fundamental questions that lie in the core of this paper are, firstly, in which way and extent new surveillance technologies empower employers as owners of the complete production process, and secondly, whether usage of new surveillance technologies will fulfill the long-lasting capitalists desire to make workforce a predictable component of the working process. Beside defining theoretical framework and analyzing different aspects of work surveillance, we have conducted an empirical research in the form of 15 in-depth interviews with people employed in different types of Serbian working organizations. The results of our research showed that surveillance practice is widespread in both international and domestic working organizations. What is even more surprising, the employees, with the exception of rare and sporadic resistant strategies, quite readily accept surveillance as a natural fact without any idea that their working and human rights have been violated.
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
Ball, K. (2010) Workplace surveillance: an overview. Labor History, 51(1): 87-106
|
2
|
Bentam, Dž. (2014) Panoptikon. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing
|
5
|
Bolčić, S. (2003) Svet rada u transformaciji lekcije iz savremene sociologije rada. Beograd: Plato
|
1
|
Braverman, H. (1974/1983) Rad i monopolistički kapital. Zagreb: Prometej
|
|
Brustein, J. (2013) The case for wearing productivity sensors on the job. Bloomberg Businessweek, December 19, 2013
|
|
Cavico, F., Mujtaba, B., Muffler, S., Samuel, M. (2013) Social media and the workplace: legal, ethical, and practical considerations for management. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, Vol. 12(1), 1-46
|
10
|
Damjanović, M.D. (1990) Menadžerska revolucija - stanje i perspektiva teorije organizacije i teorije upravljanja. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva
|
|
Fuchs, C., Trottier, D. (2012) The Internet as Surveilled Workplayplace and Factory. u: Gutwirth, Serge; Leenes, Ronald; de Hert, Paul; Poullet, Yves [ur.] European Data Protection: Coming of Age, Dordrecht: Springer Nature, str. 33-57
|
9
|
Fuko, M. (1997) Nadzirati i kažnjavati. Beograd: Prosveta
|
|
Fuko, M. (2014) Oko moći. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing
|
54
|
Gidens, E. (1998) Posledice modernosti. Beograd: Filip Višnjić
|
|
Graham, S., Wood, D. (2003) Digitizing Surveillance: Categorization, Space, Inequality. Critical Social Policy, 23(2): 227-248
|
|
Gregg, M. (2011) Work's Intimacy. Malden, MA: Polity
|
|
Koeppel, D. (2011) More people are using smartphones to secretly record office conversations. Business Insider, July 28, 2011
|
3
|
Marks, K. (1973) Kapital. Bigz, 1-3
|
|
Marx, G. (2002) What's New About the ‘New Surveillance'?, Classifying for Change and Continuity. Surveillance & Society, Vol. 1(1): 9-29
|
|
Marx, G.T. (2005) Soft surveillance: The growth of mandatory volunteerism in collecting personal information: ‘Hey buddy can you spare a DNA?'.
|
|
Milošević, B. (2014) Naučnotehnološka revolucija ili onaučavanje rada organizacije - tehnologija, virtuelno poslovanje i društveni progres. u: Todorović D.; Petrović D.; Prlja D. [ur.] Internet i društvo, Niš: Filozofski fakultet, 2014, str. 183-194
|
|
Ramasastry, A. (2012) Can employers legally ask you for your Facebook password when you apply for a job?. Verdict.Justia.com. https://verdict.justia.com/2012/03/27/canemployers-legally-ask-you-for-your-facebook-password-when-you-apply-for-a-job
|
|
Rosenblat, A., Kneese, T., Iboyd, A. (2014) Workplace Surveillance. u: Open Society Foundations' Future of Work Commissioned Research Papers
|
1
|
Sánchez, A.P., Levin, A., del Riego, A. (2012) Blurred Boundaries: Social Media Privacy and the Twenty-First-Century Employee. American Business Law Journal, 49(1): 63-124
|
|
Saval, N. (2014) Cubed: A Secret History of the Workplace. New York, NY: Doubleday
|
|
Schlehahn, E., Hansen, M., Sterbik-Lamina, J., Samaniego, J.S. (2013) Report on surveillance technology and privacy enhancing design. u: Surveillance, Privacy and Security: A large scale participatory assessment of criteria and factors determining acceptability and acceptance of security technologies in Europe
|
|
Sewell, G., Barker, J. R. (2006) Coercion versus care: using irony to make sense of organizational surveillance. Academy of Management Review, 31(4): 934-961
|
|
Sewell, G. (1998) The Discipline of Teams: The Control of Team-Based Industrial Work Through Electronic and Peer Surveillance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(2): 397
|
|
Stanton, J.M., Stam, K.R. (2002) Information technology, privacy, and power within organizations: A view from boundary theory and social exchange perspectives. Surveillance & Society, Vol. 1(2): 152-190
|
|
Thompson, P. (2002) Fantasy Island: a Labour Process critique of the ‘age of surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 1(2); 138-151
|
|
Watkins, A.M., Coopman, S.J., Hart, J.L., Walker, K.L. (2007) Workplace Surveillance and Managing Privacy Boundaries. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(2): 172-200
|
|
Wood, D., Ball, K., Lyon, D., Norris, C., Raab, C. (2006) A Report on the Surveillance Society. UK: Surveillance Studies Network
|
|
Yon, D. (2001) Surveillance society. Buckingham: Open University Press
|
|
|
|