Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:1
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:0

Sadržaj

članak: 2 od 3  
Back povratak na rezultate
2013, vol. 50, br. 10-12, str. 7-23
Na raskršću 'tvrdog' i 'mekog' prava - savremeni regulatorni okviri korporativnog upravljanja
Univerzitet Crne Gore, Pravni fakultet, Crna Gora
Ključne reči: korporativno upravljanje; meko pravo; tvrdo pravo; dobrovoljna primena; društveno odgovorno poslovanje; podstreci
Sažetak
Ovaj članak se pretežno fokusira na sve pristupnije tzv. 'meko pravo korporativnog upravljanja' i predstavlja pokušaj da se analizira njegova i efikasnost regulatornih okvira koji na njemu zasnivaju nastojanja da se promovišu i primijene najviši standardi korporativnog upravljanja, a u odnosu na efikasnost tradicionalno prisutnih pravnih instrumenata koji čine tzv. 'tvrdo pravo korporativnog upravljanja'. Ipak, na početku, imajući u vidu njihovu nedorečenost, autor pokušava preciznije da utvrdi sadržinu navedenih ključnih pojmova. Konačno, nakon sprovedene analize prednosti i nedostataka oba regulatorna pristupa, u članku se iznosi zaključak kako su, nezavisno od tendencije rasta obima i značaja instrumenata mekog prava korporativnog upravljanja, makar u ovom trenutku, regulatorni okviri korporativnog upravljanja s pravom i dalje utemeljeni na pravnim instrumentima koji pripadaju kategoriji tvrdog prava korporatinog upravljanja. Najzad, iznijet je i stav kako je, u svijetlu očigledne konvergencije dva analizirana regulatorna pristupa, ključno pitanje danas kako pronaći pravu ravnotežu pri istovremenoj primjeni oba regulatorna pristupa.
Reference
*** (2002) Final report of the group on a modern regulatory framework for company law in Europe. Winter report
*** Zakon o reformi računovodstva javnih kompanija i zaštiti investitora (engl. Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act)
*** Cadbury report: Report of the committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance
Alen, N. (2008) Corporate social responsibility: Governance gain or laissez-faire figleaf?. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, str. 445-446
Anand, I.A. (2006) An analysis of enabling vs. mandatory corporate governance: Structures post-Sarbanes-Oxley. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, br. 31, 235-236
Coffee, J.C. (2002) Racing towards the Top?: The Impact of Cross-Listings and Stock Market Competition on International Corporate Governance. Columbia Law Review, 102(7): 1757
Girvin, S., Frisby, S., Hudson, A. (2005) Charlesworth's company law. London: Sweet & Maxwell
Guzman, A.T., Meyer, T.L. (2010) International Soft Law. Journal of Legal Analysis, 2 (1): 174
Hopt, K.J. (2011) Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and International Regulation. American Journal of Comparative Law, 59(1): 1-73
Jackson, K.T. (2010) Global corporate governance: Soft law and reputational accountability. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, (35): 85-86
Kerr, M., Janda, R., Chip, P. (2009) Corporate social responsibility: A legal analysis. Markham, 19-22
Khanna, M., Damon, L.A. (1999) EPA's Voluntary 33/50 Program: Impact on Toxic Releases and Economic Performance of Firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37(1): 1-25
Kinley, D., Junko, T. (2004) From talk to walk: The emergence of human rights responsibilities for corporations at international law. Virginia Journal of International Law Association, Summer, 931-1023
Klabbers, J. (1998) The Undesirability of Soft Law. Nordic Journal of International Law, 67(4): 381-391
Klaus, H.J. (2008) Oxford handbook of comparative law: Chapter 36. u: Mathias Reimann, Reinhard Zimmermann [ur.] Comparative Company Law, New York, 1182
la Porta, R., de Lopez-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. (2003) What works in securities law?. August, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=430596
Labelle, R. (2002) The statement of corporate governance practices (SCGP): A voluntary disclosure and corporate governance perspective. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=317519,2242002, 10
Meyer, T.L. (2009) Soft Law as Delegation. Fordham International Law Journal, 32 (3): 899-896
Pitts, J. (2009) Corporate social responsibility: Current status and future evolution. Rutgers Journal of Law & Public Policy, spring, 374
Savković, V. (2008) Sarbanes-Oxley Act - ključni instrument reforme američkog sistema korporativnog upravljanja pokrenute bankrotom Enron-a. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta Crne Gore, (37): 293-303
Savković, V. (2009) Društvena odgovornost kompanija - od moralne do pravne obaveze. Pravni život, 532(12): 425-436
Shaffer, G., Pollack, M.A. (2010) Hard vs. Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements and Antagonists in International Governance. Minnesota Law Review, 94: 712-717
Vasiljević, M. (2007) Korporativno upravljanje - pravni aspekti. Beograd: Pravni fakultet
Wouters, J., Chanet, L. (2008) Corporate human rights responsibility: A European perspective. Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights, summer, 11-14
 

O članku

jezik rada: srpski
vrsta rada: članak
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 02.04.2014.

Povezani članci

Nema povezanih članaka