- citations in SCIndeks: [1]
- citations in CrossRef:0
- citations in Google Scholar:[
]
- visits in previous 30 days:0
- full-text downloads in 30 days:0
|
|
2013, vol. 42, iss. 5, pp. 54-79
|
The rise and decline of universal banking
Uspon i pad univerzalnog bankarstva
Abstract
The contemporary crisis has reopened the old dilemmas about the separation of commercial and investment banking. Indisputable facts about what caused the crisis speak in favor of the thesis that the frenzied exotic operations with securities were the main trigger of the financial breakdown. The biggest roles were played by investment banks, as the main players in this market segment, hence the potential solution for preventing future financial problems imposed itself in the form of separating investment and commercial banking operations. The major argument is not to allow the taxpayers' money to once again heel the problems of private banks, problems caused by bad judgments and decisions on the part of ambitious and imprudent managers. In its first part, the paper focuses on the development of universal banking and the clarification of specific political and social circumstances relevant for the adoption of the first law regulating universal banks. The paper moves on to indicate the advantages and disadvantages of this concept, whereas its final section sums up the frameworks of the new stricter regulations and recommendations in this field of the financial market.
Sažetak
Savremena kriza pokreće stare dileme o razdvajanju komercijalnog i investicionog bankarstva. Nesumnjive činjenice o uzrocima krize govore u prilog tezi da su zahuktali egzotični poslovi s hartijama od vrednosti bili glavni pokretač finansijskog kraha. Najveće role imale su investicione banke i bile su najvažniji akter na ovom segmentu tržišta, pa se kao moguće rešenje za sprečavanje budućih finansijskih problema nametnulo razdvajanje investicionih i komercijalnih bankarskih poslova. Glavni argument je da se ne sme dozvoliti da novac poreskih obveznika ponovo leči probleme banaka u privatnom vlasništvu, probleme prouzrokovane lošim procenama i odlukama ambicioznih i neopreznih menadžera. Rad se u prvom delu fokusira na razvoj univerzalnog bankarstva i na pojašnjenje specifičnih političkih i društvenih okolnosti za nastanak prvog zakona koji reguliše univerzalne banke. Dalje se ukazuje na prednosti i manjkavosti ovog koncepta, da bi se u poslednjem delu sumirali okviri novih oštrih regulatornih propisa i preporuka u ovom segmentu finansijskog tržišta.
|
|
|
References
|
|
Allen, B., Chan, K.K., Milne, A., Thomas, S. (2012) Basel III: Is the cure worse than the disease?. International Review of Financial Analysis, 25: 159-166
|
|
Barber, L. (2013) The fall of universal banks. Economist, http://www.economist. com/news/21566439-exit-rock-star-bossesfall-universal-bank, 03/07/2013
|
|
Ber, H., Yafeh, Y., Yosha, O. (2001) Conflict of interest in universal banking: Bank lending, stock underwriting, and fund management. Journal of Monetary Economics, 47(1): 189-218
|
|
Blundell-Wignall, A. (2011) On the necessity of separating investment and commercial banking. Intereconomics, 46(6): 298-299
|
|
Boyd, J.H. (1999) Expansion of commercial banking powers … or, universal banking is the cart, not the horse. Journal of Banking & Finance, 23(2-4): 655-662
|
|
Cabral, R. (2013) A perspective on the symptoms and causes of the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(1): 103-117
|
|
Casserley, D., Harle, P., Macdonald, J. (2009) Should commercial and investment banking be separated?. London: McKinsey & Company Report
|
|
Dietrich, D., Vollmer, U. (2012) Are universal banks bad for financial stability? Germany during the world financial crisis. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 52(2): 123-134
|
1
|
Greenspan, A. (2007) Age of turbulence. New York: Penguin Press
|
2
|
Heffernan, S. (2005) Modern banking in theory and practice. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons
|
4
|
Krugman, P. (2008) The return of depression economics and the crisis of 2008. W.W. Norton Company Limited
|
|
Mitchener, K.J., Richardson, G. (2013) Does “skin in the game” reduce risk taking? Leverage, liability and the long-run consequences of new deal banking reforms. Explorations in Economic History, 50(4): 508-525
|
|
Mitchener, K.J., Wheelock, D.C. (2013) Does the structure of banking markets affect economic growth? Evidence from U.S. state banking markets. Explorations in Economic History, 50(2): 161-178
|
|
Neal, L., White, E.N. (2012) The Glass-Steagall Act in historical perspective. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 52(2): 104-113
|
|
Neuhann, D., Saidi, F. (2012) The rise of the universal bank: Financial architecture and firm volatility in the United States. http://w4.stern.nyu.edu/finance/docs/pdfs/Seminars/123f-saidi.pdf, 03/07/2013
|
8
|
Pavlović, V., Ljumović, I. (2009) Finansijska regulativa u SAD kao pokretač aktuelne svetske krize. Računovodstvo, vol. 53, br. 5-6, str. 78-93
|
|
Peláez, C.M., Peláez, C.A. (2009) Financial regulation after the global recession. Besingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
|
|
Ross, L. (1997) Financial Development and Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, 2: 717-718
|
|
Rothbard, M. (2002) A history of money and banking in the United States. Ludwig von Mises Institute
|
|
Schilbach, J. Universal banks: Optimal for clients and financial stability. Deutsche bank research, Internet, http://www.dbresearch.com/PROD/DBR_INTERNET_ENPROD/PROD0000000000296976.pdf, 03/07/2013
|
|
Tabarrok, A. (1998) The separation of commercial and investment banking: The morgans vs. The rockefellers. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 1(1): 1-18
|
|
Vallascas, F., Keasey, K. (2012) Bank resilience to systemic shocks and the stability of banking systems: Small is beautiful. Journal of International Money and Finance, 31(6): 1745-1776
|
|
Volcker, P. Ring-fencing banks is not enough. Telegraph, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/ banksandfinance/9561624/Paul-Volckerring-fencing-banks-is-not-enough.html, 03/07/2013
|
|
Walter, I. (2012) Universal banking and financial architecture. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 52(2): 114-122
|
|
|
|