Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:7
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:3

Contents

article: 3 from 4  
Back back to result list
2019, vol. 14, iss. 2, pp. 1-14
Relationship between principle of process economy and testimony plea bargain
University of Priština - Kosovska Mitrovica, Faculty of Law, Serbia
Keywords: principle of process economy; testimony plea bargain; defendant; witness
Abstract
In recent years, it has been increasingly striving to make the criminal procedure efficient and at the same time economical. In line with the established international legal standards, the Republic of Serbia for the first time, by the Code of Criminal Procedure since 2006, regulated the agreement on the recognition of a criminal offense. The reformed Code of Criminal Procedure since 2011 introduced two similar criminal procedural forms, an agreement on the testimony of the defendant and an agreement on the testimony of the convicted person. In a short time as it exists in our judicial practice, the agreement on the recognition of a crime has yielded very successful results. It proved to be extremely efficient and economical. By the agreement on the defendant's testimony, the defendant acknowledges the commission of a criminal offense and assumes the obligation to testify against the accomplice. The purpose of this institute is that the public prosecutor obtains a reliable prosecution witness who would contribute to the condemnation of his accomplice with his testimony. As in the literature, the agreement on the recognition of the criminal offense and the defendant's testimony, it gives the character of simplified criminal procedural forms, the author aims to determine whether indeed all segments of the principles of the process economy are realized in relation to the defendant.
References
*** (2007) Evropska konvencija za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda. in: Ljudska prava - osnovni međunarodni dokumenti, Požega: Epoha
*** (2007) Međunarodni pakt o građanskim i političkim pravima. in: Ljudska prava - osnovni međunarodni dokumenti, Požega: Epoha
*** (2015) Zakon o zaštiti prava na suđenje u razumnom roku. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 40
*** (2011-2019) Zakonik o krivičnom postupku. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 72/2011, 101/2011, 121/2012, 32/2013, 45/2013, 55/2014 i 35/2019
Bejatović, S. (2015) Efikasnost krivičnog postupka kao međunarodni pravni standard i reforma krivičnog procesnog zakonodavstva Srbije - norma i praksa. Nauka, bezbednost, policija, vol. 20, br. 2, str. 27-53
Delibašić, V. (2016) Osnovne novine u Zakoniku o krivičnom postupku iz 2011. godine. Beograd: Partneri za demokratske promene Srbija
Ilić, P.G., Majić, M., Beljanski, S., Trešnjev, A. (2013) Komentar Zakonika o krivičnom postupku. Beograd: Službeni glasnik
Knežević, S., Đukić, M. (2017) Sporazum o svedočenju okrivljenog u krivičnom procesnom zakonodavstvu Srbije. in: Naučni skup sa međunarodnim učešćem 'Nacionalno i međunarodno pravo - aktuelna pitanja i teme', Pravni fakultet Priština - Kosovska Mitrovica, Kosovska Mitrovica, Tom I, str. 429-445
Knežević, S. (2012) Osnovna načela krivičnog procesnog prava. Niš: SKC
Saverda, J.C. (1990) Accomplices in federal court: A case for increased evidentary standards. Yale Law Journal, 100(3), p.p. 785-804
Stojadinović, D. (2017) Sporazum o priznanju krivičnog dela. Iustitia, 1, str. 52-55
Škulić, M. (2015) Organizovani kriminalitet - pojam, pojavni oblici, krivična dela i krivični postupak. Beograd: Službeni glasnik
Weinstein, I. (1999) Regulating the market for snitches. Buffalo Law Review, vol. 47, pp. 563-644
Žugić, S. (2017) Efikasnost i ekonomičnost krivičnog postupka. Iustitia, 1, str. 61-63
 

About

article language: Serbian
document type: Review Paper
DOI: 10.5937/ekonsig1902001Q
published in SCIndeks: 26/02/2020
Creative Commons License 4.0

Related records

No related records