- citati u SCIndeksu: [3]
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:2
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:0
|
|
2014, vol. 63, br. 2, str. 175-188
|
Promena paradigme ocenjivanja u nastavi kao elemenat strategije unapređivanja kvaliteta obrazovanja
Changing evaluation paradigm in the teaching process as an element of the strategy for enhancing the quality of education
Projekat: Modeli procenjivanja i strategije unapređivanja kvaliteta obrazovanja u Srbiji (MPNTR - 179060)
Sažetak
Predmet ovoga rada su razlozi i argumentacija za paradigmatsko menjanje ocenjivanja u nastavi radi unapređivanja kvaliteta obrazovanja. U radu se najpre razmatraju aktuelna kretanja u proučavanju ocenjivanja kao kontekst za razumevanje zalaganja za promenu paradigme. Potom se razmatra upotreba pojma naučne paradigme u literaturi o ocenjivanju i pedagoško-didaktički razlozi za paradigmatsku promenu dominantnog načina ocenjivanja. U završnom delu rada ovi podaci se dovode u vezu sa zahtevima za podizanje kvaliteta ocenjivanja i diskutuje se o promeni paradigme kao delu strategije unapređivanja kvaliteta. Podaci iz pregleda pokazuju da ocenjivanje u nastavi suštinski zavisi od polazišta o prirodi obrazovanja, znanja, učenja i podučavanja i da se menja - menjanjem paradigme iz njihove osnove. Današnje prakse ocenjivanja uspostavljene su u prošlosti prema potrebama tadašnjih društava i na znanjima koja su danas prevaziđena i treba ih menjati na način da služe učioničkim procesima podučavanja i učenja i to iz perspektive učenika. Paradigmatsko menjanje ocenjivanja zahteva sistemsku podršku, kvalitet promene je lokalno specifičan, a glavni akteri procesa razumevanja, procenjivanja i građenja kvaliteta ocenjivanja jesu učenici i nastavnici. U procesu menjanja paradigma ima višestruke funkcije.
Abstract
The article deals with reasons and argumentation for a paradigmatic change of evaluation in the teaching process in order to enhance the quality of education. First current developments in the study of evaluation are considered as the context for understanding the advocacy for the paradigm change. Then the use of the term scientific paradigm as found in the literature on evaluation is considered and the reasons for changing the dominant way of evaluation are presented. In the final part of the article these data are related to the requirements for high quality evaluation and the change of the paradigm, seen as part of the strategy for enhancing the quality, is discussed. The data obtained by the analysis reveal that evaluation in the teaching process basically depends upon the nature of education, knowledge, learning and teaching and that it changes - by changing the paradigm in its basis. Current evaluation practices were formed according to the needs of different societies in the past and knowledge that is obsolete today. Evaluation practices should now be changed in order to contribute to class teaching/learning processes from the perspective of the student. Paradigmatic changing of evaluation needs systemic support, the quality of change is locally specific and the main actors of understanding, evaluating and building up the quality of evaluation are students and teachers. In the process of changing the paradigm has multiple functions.
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
*** (2012) Strategija razvoja obrazovanja u Srbiji do 2020. godine. Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije, br. 107
|
1
|
Aikenhead, G.S. (1997) A framework for reflecting on assessment and evaluation. May 2, 2014, http://www.usask.ca/education/people/ainkenhead/seoulassess.htm
|
3
|
Armstrong, T. (2008) Najbolje škole - kako istraživanje razvoja čovjeka može usmjeravati pedagošku praksu. Zagreb: Educa
|
|
Bain, J. (2010) Integrating student voice: Assessment for empowerment. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, Vol. 4, No. 1, 14-29
|
2
|
Gipps, C. (1994) Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: Falmer Press
|
|
Gipps, C. (2002) Sociocultural Perspectives on Assessment. Learning for Life in the 21st Century, str. 73-83
|
7
|
Gojkov, G.S. (1997) Dokimologija. Beograd: Učiteljski fakultet
|
|
Gordon Commission (2013) To assess, to teach, to learn: A vision for the future of assessment: Technical report. May 5, 2014, http://www.gordoncommission.org/rsc/pdfs/gordon_commission_technical_report.pdf
|
19
|
Habermas, J. (1975) Saznanje i interes. Beograd: Nolit
|
|
Hebib, E.Dž. (2013) Kako razvijati školu. Beograd: Institut za pedagogiju i andragogiju Filozofskog fakulteta
|
|
Keesing, S.L. (2003) The relationship between critical pedagogy and assessment in teacher education. May 10, 2014, http://radicalpedagogy.icaap.org/content/issue5_V03_keesing-styles.html
|
11
|
Kun, T. (1974) Struktura naučnih revolucija. Beograd: Nolit
|
4
|
Kuzmanović, D., Pavlović-Babić, D. (2011) Pristupi procenjivanju obrazovnih postignuća učenika - kritički osvrt. Zbornik Instituta za pedagoška istraživanja, vol. 43, br. 1, str. 63-85
|
4
|
Mitrović, M., Radulović, L. (2011) Načini razumevanja i konceptualizovanja kvaliteta obrazovanja u nastavi. u: Kačavenda-Radić N., Pavlović-Breneselović D., Antonijević R. [ur.] Kvalitet u obrazovanju, Beograd: Institut za pedagogiju i andragogiju Filozofskog fakulteta, str. 135-156
|
|
Mitrović, M. (2012) Promene u teoriji i praksi ocenjivanja u nastavi i njihova značenja za istraživanje kvaliteta u obrazovanju. u: Vujisić-Živković N., Mitrović M., Ovesni K. [ur.] Posebna pitanja kvaliteta u obrazovanju, Beograd: Institut za pedagogiju i andragogiju Filozofskog fakulteta, str. 155-172
|
|
Mons, N. (2009) Theoretical and real effects of standardised assessment. March 16, 2014, http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/111en.pdf
|
|
Redecker, C., Johannessen, Ø. (2013) Changing Assessment - Towards a New Assessment Paradigm Using ICT. European Journal of Education, 48(1): 79-96
|
2
|
Rogoff, B. (1994) Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture and Activity, Vol. 1, No. 4, 209-229
|
|
Ryan, A.G. (1988) Program Evaluation within the Paradigms: Mapping the Territory. Science Communication, 10(1): 25-47
|
2
|
Wells, G. (2006) Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge university press
|
|
Wilbrink, B. (1997) Assessment in historical perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(1): 31-48
|
|
|
|