- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:6
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Istraživački pristup za formiranje nove tipologije teorije prostornog planiranja
Research approach for forming a new typology of spatial planning theory
Projekat: Uloga i implementacija državnog prostornog plana i regionalnih razvojnih dokumenata u obnovi strateškog istraživanja, mišljenja i upravljanja u Srbiji (MPNTR - 47014)
Ključne reči: teorija prostornog planiranja; istraživački pristup; kvalitativne tipologije; kvantitativne tipologije
Keywords: planning theory; research approach; qualitative typologies; quantitative typologies
Sažetak
U ovom radu predlaže se istraživački pristup za sistematizaciju znanja i klasifikovanje teorijskih doprinosa u naučnoj oblasti prostornog planiranja. Tipologija predstavlja višedimenzionalnu klasifikaciju, odnosno okvir za razumevanje predmetne oblasti, teorije i prakse, ideja i metodologija. Složeni pristup je potreban da bi se uredila kompleksna i raznovrsna oblast teorije prostornog planiranja, koju su oblikovale različite škole razmišljanja i uticaji iz srodnih naučnih disciplina. Predlaže se da istraživački pristup bude most između dve kulture, odnosno sinteza kvalitativnog i kvantitativnog metoda formiranja tipologija. Putem analize postojećih tipologija, koje su kvantitativno izvedene, izabrani koncepti će se unaprediti i dopuniti kroz kompjuterizovanu statističku analizu odgovarajućih bibliometrijskih podataka. Koristiće se i procedura u suprotnom smeru, koja takođe povezuje empirijske tipove sa njihovim konceptualnim ekvivalentima. Cilj je da se takvim pristupom dobije sveobuhvatna klasifikaciona šema, koja će imati ulogu platforme za integraciju interdisciplinarnog pristupa prostornom planiranju.
Abstract
What is being suggested in this paper is the research approach for the classification of theoretical contributions in the scientific domain of the spatial planning. Typology is a multidimensional classification, actually it is the framework for the understanding of the subject area, theory and practice, ideas and methodologies. The complex approach is needed to organize the complex and diverse domain of spatial planning theory, which has been shaped by different schools of thought and the influences of the related scientific disciplines. It has been suggested that the research approach becomes the bridge between two cultures, in other words it should be the synthesis of the qualitative and quantitative methods of the typology construction. With the analysis of the existing typologies, which are quantitatively derived, the chosen concepts will be improved and completed due to the computerized statistical analysis of the appropriate bibliometrical data. Moreover, the procedure in the opposite direction will be used, which also connects empiric types with their conceptual counterparts. With that approach, the main aim is to achieve the comprehensive classification scheme, which will take part of the platform for integration of the interdisciplinary approach in the spatial planning domain. That concept of the research belongs to the wider approach that has got the aim that with the scientific innovations and imaginations bring about the solving of the problems and challenges that the spatial planning faces with. The forming of the new typology is the first step in that direction.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
|
Alexander, E.R. (1997) A mile or a millimeter?: Measuring the planning theory-practice gap. Environmental and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24
|
|
|
Alexander, E.R. (1979) Planning theory: Introduction to urban planning. New York: Mc Graw-Hill
|
|
5
|
Allmendinger, P. (2002) Planning theory. New York-Basingstoke, itd: Palgrave
|
|
|
Archibugi, F. (2004) Planning theory: Reconstruction or requiem for planning?. European Planning Studies, 12(3), 425-444
|
|
|
Bailey, K. (2005) Typology construction, methods and issues: Encyclopedia of social measurement. Amsterdam: Elsevier
|
|
|
Cooke, P. (1983) Theories of planning and spatial development. London: Hutchinson
|
|
4
|
Faludi, A. (1973) Planning theory. Oxford-New York, itd: Pergamon Press
|
|
|
Faludi, A. (1987) A Decision-centred view of environmental planning. Oxford: Pergamon Press
|
|
|
Friedmann, J. (2003) Why do planning theory?. Planning Theory, 2, (1), 7-10
|
|
|
Friedmann, J. (2008) The uses of planning theory: A bibliographic essay. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28
|
|
10
|
Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative planning, shaping places in fragmented societies. London-New York, itd: Macmillan Publishing
|
|
1
|
Healey, P. (2007) Re-thinking key dimensions of strategic spatial planning: Sustainability and complexity, fuzzy planning: The role of actors in a fuzzy governance environment. London: Ashgate
|
|
34
|
Klajn, I., Šipka, M. (2008) Veliki rečnik stranih reči i izraza. Novi Sad: Prometej
|
|
11
|
Kun, T. (1974) Struktura naučnih revolucija. Beograd: Nolit
|
|
|
Lapintie, K. (2010) Planning theory. u: Encyclopedia of Urban Studies, London: Sage
|
|
1
|
Portugali, J. (2011) Complexity, cognition and the city. Berlin: Springer
|
|
1
|
Price, D.J. (1965) Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149 (3683), str. 510-515
|
|
|
Rorter, A., Rafols, I. (2009) Is science becoming more interdisciplinary?: Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81
|
|
4
|
Sager, T. (1994) Communicative planning theory. Aldershot, UK: Avebury
|
|
|
Shiffrin, R.M., Borner, K. (2004) Mapping knowledge domains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101
|
|
1
|
Snow, C.P. (1964) The two cultures: And a second look. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
|
|
|
Taylor, N. (1980) Planning theory and the philosophy of planning. Urban Studies, 17
|
|
4
|
Vujošević, M. (2002) Novije promene u teoriji i praksi planiranja na Zapadu i njihove pouke za planiranje u Srbiji-Jugoslaviji. Beograd: Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije / IAUS
|
|
11  
|
Vujošević, M.L. (2004) The search for a new development planning/policy mode: Problems of expertise in the transition period. Spatium, br. 10, str. 12-18
|
|
|
Yiftachel, O. (1989) Towards a new typology of urban planning theories. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 16
|
|
|
|
|