Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: [1]
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:2
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:1

Contents

article: 9 from 12  
Back back to result list
2007, vol. 54, iss. 1, pp. 103-118
Privatization in economic theory
School of Economics, University of Montenegro, Institute for Strategic Studies and Prognoses (ISSP), Podgorica, Crna Gora

emailmajad@cg.yu
Abstract
In reality privatization has never occurred according to the handbook rules of ordinary market transactions. Not even in advanced market economies can privatization transactions be described by the Walrasian or Arrowian, or Leontiefian equilibrium models, or by the equilibrium models of the game theory. In these economies transactions of privatization take place in a fairly organic way – which means that those are driven by the dominance of private property rights and in a market economy. But despite this fact Western privatization also some peculiar features as compared to ordinary company takeovers, since the state as the seller may pursue non – economic goals. Changes in the dominant form of property change positions and status of many individuals and groups in the society. That’s why privatization can even less be explained by ordinary market mechanisms in transition countries where privatizing state-owned property have happened in a mass scale and where markets and private property rights weren't established at the time process of privatization began. In this paper I’ll discuss and analyze the phenomenon of privatization in context of different economic theories arguing that empirical results go in favor of the public choice theory (Buchanan, 1978), theory of "economic constitution" (Brennan and Buchanan 1985), (Buchanan and Tullock, 1989), and theory of "collective action" (Olson, 1982). These theories argues that transition from one economic system into another, for example transition from collectivistic, socialistic system into capitalism and free market economy with dominant private property, will not happen through isolated changes of only few economic institutions, no matter how deep that changes would be. In other words privatization can not give results if it's not followed by comprehensive change of economic system because privatized companied wouldn't be able to operate in old environment.
References
Alchian, A.A., Demsetz, H. (1973) The property rights paradigm. Journal of Economic History, 33 (17), 16-27
Boettke, P. (2004) An Austrian. Economist perspective on transitional political economy. Journal of the Hayek Society at London School of Economics, pp 12-15
Brennan, G., Buchanan, J.M. (1985) The reason of rules: Constitutional political economy. Cambridge, itd: Cambridge University Press / CUP
Buchanan, J.M. (1978) Cost and choice: An inquiry in economic theory. Chicago, itd: University of Chicago Press
Buchanan, J.M., Tullock, G. (1989) The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arrbor: University of Michigan Press
Coase, R.H. (1960) The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 3, str. 1-44
Coase, R.H. (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica, vol. 4, br. 5, str. 386-405
Colombatto, E. (2001) Was transition about free market economics. Universita di Torino
Demsetz, H. (1988) Ownership, control and the firm: The organization of economic activity. Oxford, UK, itd: Blackwell, vol. 1
Drakić, M. (2004) Privatization in transition economies. Postgraduate Studies 'Entrepreneurial Economy', Master Thesis
Friedman, M.R. (1997) Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, itd: University of Chicago Press
Hayek, F.A. (2000) Order of liberty. Novi Sad: Global book
Hayek, F.A. (1944) The road to Serfdom. Novi Sad: Global book, (translation, 1997)
Jovanović, A.D. (1998) Uvod u ekonomsku analizu prava. Beograd: Pravni fakultet - Centar za publikacije
Mayor, I. (1993) Privatization in Eastern Europe: A critical approach. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar
Mises, L. (1935) Economic calculation in the Socialist Common-wealth. London: Routhledge
Mises, L., Hayek, F. (1997) Essays on free markets. Zagreb: Mate
North, D.C. (1981) Structure and change in economic history. New York, itd: Norton
North, D.C. (1991) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, itd: Cambridge University Press / CUP
Olson, M. (1982) The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. New Haven, CT, itd: Yale University Press
Pejovich, S. (1990) The basis of American capitalism. Belgrade: Naučna knjiga
Pejović, S., Vukotić, V. (2002) Transition and institutions. Belgrade: Institute of Social Sciences
Pejović, S. (1990) The economics of property rights: Towards a theory of comparative systems. Dordrecht, itd: Kluwer
Prokopijević, M. (2000) Constitutional economy. Belgrade: E press
Smith, A. (1998) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Novi Sad: Global book
Tobin, J. (1971) Monetary policies and the economy: The transmission mechanism. Southern Economic Journal, January, str. 421-431
Vickers, J., Yarrow, G. (1988) Privatization: An economic analysis. Cambridge, MA, itd: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press / MIT Press
Vukotić, V. (1993) Privatization and development of market economy. Belgrade: Institute of Social Sciences - Center for Economic Research
Vukotić, V. (1998) Theoretical foundations of Montenegrin Economic School. Podgorica: Postgraduate Studies 'Entrepreneurial Economy'
Vukotić, V. (2003) Psihophilosophy of business. Podgorica: CID
Vukotić, V. (2003) Is transition heading the wrong way. Postgraduate Studies 'Entrepreneurial Economy'
Williamson, O.E. (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York, itd: Free Press
 

About

article language: English
document type: Review Paper
DOI: 10.2298/PAN0701103D
published in SCIndeks: 03/12/2007