- citations in SCIndeks: [1]
- citations in CrossRef:0
- citations in Google Scholar:[
]
- visits in previous 30 days:6
- full-text downloads in 30 days:0
|
|
|
Suppression of terrorism and the Criminal Code of Germany
Suzbijanje terorizma i Krivični zakonik Nemačke
Criminology and Police Academy, Belgrade
Project: Development of Institutional Capacities, Standards and Procedures for Fighting Organized Crime and Terrorism in Climate of International Integrations (MESTD - 179045)
Abstract
We are witnessing the time when terrorist incidents escalate all around the world. During the last several decades the international community has been working on creation of mechanisms to prosecute and punish the offenders of serious crimes such as terrorism. The states are more and more focused on harmonizing national criminal legislations with the international documents in order to unify incriminations of terrorism, as well as terrorism-related crimes. This harmonization includes also the punishments in order to prevent the terrorists to take advantage of favorable conditions which result from the differences among the national legislations. Despite great willingness and increasing consensus among the states regarding the reform and further development of legal solutions, this process faces many challenges. The central part of this paper consists of the answers to the question if the Federal Republic of Germany, faced with the threat of global terrorism, has adequate criminal provisions, i.e. if the implementation of the most important international documents has been made. This paper offers the review of the development of contemporary German criminal law in the field of fighting terrorism and gives the answer to the question if there is a harmony between the measures applied by the German criminal legislation in order to suppress terrorism as well as criteria which are considered consistent with the principles of the rule of law.
Sažetak
Svedoci smo vremena u kome teroristički incidenti eskaliraju širom sveta. Međunarodna zajednica je u poslednjih nekoliko decenija intenzivno radila na kreiranju mehanizama za gonjenje i kažnjavanje učinilaca teških krivičnih dela kao što je terorizam. Države su sve više fokusirane na usklađivanje nacionalnih krivičnih zakonodavstava sa međunarodnim dokumentima u pravcu unifikovanja inkriminacije terorizma, kao i sa njim povezanim krivičnim delima. Harmonizacija obuhvata i zaprećene kazne kako bi se sprečili učinioci krivičnog dela terorizma da koriste pogodnosti koje su posledica razlika između nacionalnih zakonodavstava. Uprkos velikoj spremnosti i sve većem konsenzusu među državama po pitanju reforme i daljeg razvoja zakonskih rešenja, ovaj proces suočen je sa mnogim izazovima. Centralni deo rada predstavlja davanje odgovora na pitanje da li Savezna Republika Nemačka, suočena sa pretnjom globalnog terorizma, ima adekvatne krivičnopravne odredbe tj. da li je izvršena implementacija najvažnijih međunarodnih dokumenata. Ovaj članak nudi pregled razvoja savremenog nemačkog krivičnog prava na polju borbe protiv terorizma i daje odgovor na pitanje da li postoji sklad između mera koje se u nemačkom krivičnom zakonodavstvu primenjuju u cilju suzbijanja terorizma i kriterijuma koji se smatraju doslednim principima pravne države.
|
|
|
References
|
|
*** (1998) Krivični zakonik Savezne Republike Nemačke sa uvodnim zakonom za krivični zakonik i Vojno krivičnim zakonom. Beograd: Centar marketing, str. 1
|
2
|
Bader, M. (2009) Das Geset zur Verfolgung der Vorbereitung von schweren staatsgefährdenden Gewalttaten. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift
|
2
|
Cassese, A. (2006) The Multifaceted Criminal Notion of Terrorism in International Law. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 4(5): 933-958
|
2
|
Kolarić, D. (2008) Krivično delo ubistva. Beograd: Službeni glasnik
|
3
|
Kurth, C.A. (2009) Behind the Curve, Globalization and International Terrorism. in: Russell D.Howard, Reid L.Sawyer, Natasha E.Bajema [ed.] Terrorism and Counter Terrorism: Readings and Interpretations, Boston: Higher education
|
2
|
Nuotio, K. (2006) Terrorism as a catalyst for the emergence: Harmonization and reform of criminal law. Journal of International Criminal Justice
|
2
|
Patané, V. (2006) Recent Italian efforts to respond to terrorism at the legislative level. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 4, 1167
|
|
Radtke, H., Steinsiek, M. (2010) Terrorismusbekämpfung durch Vorfeldkriminalisierung. JR, Heft 3, p. 107
|
1
|
Schäfer, J. (2008) Aus der Rechtsprechung des BGH zum Staatsschutzstrafrecht. Neue Zetischrift für Strafrecht-Rechtsprechungs Report
|
2
|
Sieber, U. (2009) Legitimation und Grenzen von Gefahrdubgsdelikten im Vorfeld von teroristischer Gewalt. Neue Zeitschrift fur Strafrecht, 7, str. 363-364
|
12
|
Stojanović, Z., Kolarić, D. (2010) Krivičnopravno reagovanje na teške oblike kriminaliteta. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta
|
1
|
Stojanović, Z. (2010) Komentar krivičnog zakonika Crne Gore. Podgorica: Misija OSCE u Crnoj Gori
|
1
|
Stojanović, Z. (2007) Ustav Republike Srbije i materijalno krivično zakonodavstvo. in: Ustav Republike Srbije, krivično zakonodavstvo i organizacija pravosuđa, Zlatibor-Beograd: Srpsko udruženje za krivično-pravnu teoriju i praksu, 20
|
95
|
Stojanović, Z.P. (2010) Krivično pravo - opšti deo. Beograd
|
1
|
Weiβer, B. (2009) Über den Umgang des Strafrechts mit terroristischen Bedrohungslagen. ZStW, 121, 1, p. 136
|
|
|
|