Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: [1]
  • citations in CrossRef:[3]
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:6
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:1

Contents

article: 4 from 5  
Back back to result list
2019, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 139-154
Causes of failure of the Phillips curve: Does tranquillity of economic environment matter?
Istanbul University, Turkey

emailyhlas.sovbetov@ogr.iu.edu.tr
Keywords: The Phillips Curve; inflation; recession; tranquility
Abstract
Although empirical literature regarding the Phillips curve is sizeable enough, there is still no wide consensus on its validity and stability. The literature shows that the Phillips relationship is fragile and varies across countries and time periods; a statistical relationship that appears strong during one decade (country) may be weak the next (other). This variability might have some grounds for idiosyncrasy of a country and its economic environment. To address it, this paper scrutinizes the Phillips relationship over 41 countries over the period 1980-2016, paying attention to how inflation dynamics behave during tranquil and recessionary periods. As a result, the paper confirms the variability of the Phillips relationship across countries, as well as time periods. It documents that the relationship holds in the majority of developed countries, while it fails to hold in emerging and frontier economies during tranquil periods. On the other hand, the relationship totally collapses during recessionary periods, even in developed markets. This shows that tranquillity of economic environment is significantly important for the Phillip trade-off to work smoothly. Moreover, both backwardand forward-looking fractions of inflation remarkably increase during recessionary periods as a result of the Phillips coefficient loses its significance within the model. This indicates that markets become more inflation-sensitive during these periods.
References
Ball, L., Mazumder, S. (2011) Inflation Dynamics and the Great Recession. IMF Working Paper, No: 11/121
Ball, L., Mazumder, S. (2015) A Phillips Curve with Anchored Expectations and Short-Term Unemployment. IMF Working Papers, 15(39): 1-1
Bernanke, B. (2010) The Economic Outlook and Monetary Policy. in: Speech delivered at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Symposium, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, 27 August
Clerc, L., Dellas, H., Loisel, O. (2010) To Be or Not to Be in Monetary Union: A Synthesis. SSRN Electronic Journal, 30-30
Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y. (2015) Is the Phillips Curve Alive and Well after All? Inflation Expectations and the Missing Disinflation. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 7(1): 197-232
Daly, M., Hobijn, B., Lucking, B. (2012) Why Has Wage Growth Stayed Strong?. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Letter, 2012-2022
Del, B.A., Fratianni, M., Spinelli, F., Trecroci, C. (2010) The Phillips curve and the Italian lira, 1861-1998. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 21: 182-197
Doser, A., Nunes, R., Rao, N., Sheremirov, V. (2017) Inflation Expectations and Nonlinearities in the Phillips Curve. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, WP No.17-11
Fendel, R., Lis, E.M., Rülke, J. (2011) Do professional forecasters believe in the Phillips curve? Evidence from the G7 countries. Journal of Forecasting, 30: n/a-n/a
Friedman, M. (1968) The Role of Monetary Policy. American Economic Review, 58(1): 1-17
Friedrich, C. (2016) Global inflation dynamics in the post-crisis period: What explains the puzzles?. Economics Letters, 142(2): 31-34
Hall, R.E. (2011) The Long Slump. American Economic Review, 101(2): 431-469
Hodrick, R.J., Prescott, E.C. (1997) Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 29(1): 1-1
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2013) The Dog That Didn't Bark: Has Inflation Been Muzzled or Was It Just Sleeping?. World Economic Outlook, Washington, DC, 79-96, April
Karan, S.B., Kanakaraj, A., Sridevi, T.O. (2011) Revisiting the empirical existence of the Phillips curve for India. Journal of Asian Economics, 22(3): 247-258
Lucas, E.R.Jr. (1976) Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. in: Brunner, K. Meltzer, A. [ed.] The Phillips Curve and Labor Markets: Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, New York: American Elsevier, Vol. 1. 19-46
Murphy, A. (2018) The Death of the Phillips Curve?. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas-Research Department, Working Paper 1801
Nub, P. (2013) An Empirical Analysis of the Phillips Curve: A Time Series Exploration of Germany. Linnaeus University, Thesis
Ojapinwa, T.V., Esan, F. (2013) Does Philips Relations Really Exist in Nigeria? Empirical Evidence. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(9): 123-133
Paul, B.P. (2009) In search of the Phillips curve for India. Journal of Asian Economics, 20(4): 479-488
Phelps, E.S. (1967) Phillips Curves, Expectations of Inflation and Optimal Unemployment over Time. Economica, 34(135): 254-254
Phillips, A.W. (1958) The Relation between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wage Rates in the United Kingdom, 1861-1957. Economica, 25(100): 283-283
Ravn, M.O., Uhlig, H. (2002) On Adjusting the Hodrick-Prescott Filter for the Frequency of Observations. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2): 371-376
Russell, B., Banerjee, A. (2008) The long-run Phillips curve and non-stationary inflation. Journal of Macroeconomics, 30(4): 1792-1815
Samuelson, P.A., Solow, R.M. (1960) Analytical Aspects of Anti-inflation Policy. American Economic Review, 50(2): 177-194
Simionescu, M. (2014) Testing the Existence and Stability of Phillips Curve in Romania. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 10(1): 67-74
Sovbetov, Y., Kaplan, M. (2019) Empirical Examination of Stability of NEO-Classical Phillips Curve since 1980. Theoretical and Applied Economics, (forthcoming)
Wimanda, R.E., Turner, P.M., Hall, M.J.B. (2013) The shape of the Phillips curve: The case of Indonesia. Applied Economics, 45(29): 4114-4121
 

About

article language: English
document type: Original Scientific Paper
DOI: 10.5937/EJAE16-21569
published in SCIndeks: 27/10/2019
peer review method: double-blind
Creative Commons License 4.0

Related records

No related records