- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:7
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:6
|
|
|
2018, vol. 66, br. 1-2, str. 177-188
|
|
Pravo i ekonomija zloupotrebe dominantnog položaja
The law and economy of the abuse of a dominant position
aCommission for Protection of Competition, Belgrade
bUniverzitet u Beogradu, Ekonomski fakultet, Katedra za poslovnu ekonomiju i menadžment, Srbija
Sažetak
Fer tržišni uslovi su preduslov postojanja razvijenog i slobodnog tržišta, te je predmet ovog rada zaštita konkurencije, odnosno zloupotreba dominantnog tržišnog položaja iz pravno-ekonomskog ugla. Poseban fokus je na razmatranju ciljeva zabrane zloupotrebe dominantnog položaja od strane preduzeća, definisanju relevnantnog tržišta kao ključnog elementa u procesu utvrđivanja povrede konkurencije i utvrđivanju dominantnog položaja. Posebno su obrazloženi primeri iz poslovne prakse u kojima su analizirane različite prakse zloupotrebe dominantnog položaja: odbijanje i prekid saradnje, predatorsko ponašanje, individualno i asortimansko vezivanje proizvoda, definisanje prekomernih cena, neadekvatna rabatna politika, nametanje ekskluzive i diskriminacija kupaca. Pored toga u radu su predstavljene i mere, koje stoje na raspolaganju Komisiji za zaštitu konkurencije, za otklanjanje povreda konkurencije.
Abstract
Fair market conditions are a precondition for the existence of a developed and free market, and the object of this paper is the protection of competition, i.e. the abuse of a dominant market position from the legal and economic points of view. Particular focus is placed on considering the objectives of prohibiting abuse of a dominant position by an enterprise, defining the relevant market as a key element in the process of determining competition rules violation and determining the dominant position. Particularly explained are examples from business practice that analyze various practices of abuse of a dominant position: refusal and termination of cooperation, predatory behavior, tying and bundling, defining excessive prices, inadequate rebate policy, imposing exclusivity and discriminating customers. In addition, the measures, which are available to the Commission for Protection of Competition, are presented in the paper with the aim of eliminating competition rules violations.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
|
*** (1890) Sherman Act. ch. 708, 26 Stat. 289. U.S.C
|
|
6 
|
Begović, B., Labus, M., Jovanović, A. (2017) Ekonomija za pravnike. Beograd: Pravni fakultet: Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje, Osmo izdanje
|
|
2
|
Carlton, D.W., Perloff, J.M. (2005) Modern industrial organization. New York: Addison-Wesley
|
|
|
Commission for Protection of Competition (2010) Eki transfers and tenfore. decision 5/0-02-10/10-1 of 12.01.2010, Retrieved from http://www.kzk.gov.rs/kzk/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/ Resenje-EKI-Transfers-12.01.2010.pdf
|
|
|
Commission for Protection of Competition (2012) Frikom, announcement 2012/12. Retrieved from http://www.kzk.org. rs/kzk/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Saopstenje-Frikom.pdf
|
|
|
Commission for Protection of Competition (2014) JKP Pogrebne usluge, decision5/0-02-27/12-15 of 27.11.2014. Retrieved from http://www.kzk.gov.rs/kzk/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/JKPPogrebne- usluge-Resenje-27.11.2014.pdf
|
|
|
Commission for Protection of Competition (2016) EPS Distribucija, decision5/0-02-563/2016-60 of 23.12.2016. Retrieved from http://www.kzk.gov.rs/kzk/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/ RESENJE-EPS-Distribucija1.pdf
|
|
|
Commission for Protection of Competition (2017) Inter Turs Plus, decision5/0-02-90/2017-131 of 23.10.2017. Retrieved from http://www.kzk.gov.rs/kzk/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ Resenje-InterTursPlus1.pdf
|
|
|
European Commission (1973) Europemballage and continental can company. judgment of 21.02.1973 - Case 6/72. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?u ri=CELEX:61972CJ0006 and from=EN
|
|
|
European Commission (1978) United Brands v Commission. judgment of 14. 2. 1978 - CASE 27/76. Retrieved from http:// eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:61 976CJ0027 and from=EN
|
|
|
Lianos, I., Geradin, D. (2013) Handbook on European Competition Law. Edward Elgar Publishing
|
|
|
Lončar, D., Milošević, S. (2013) Antitrust compliance program as a basic competence of companies. u: Janićijević N., Lovreta S. [ur.] Konkurentnost preduzeća u Srbiji, Belgrade: CID Ekonomskog fakulteta, 261-280
|
|
1
|
Lončar, D., Milošević, S. (2015) Antitrust policy in Serbia: Regulatory framework and enforcement mechanism. Journal of Contemporary Economic and Business Issues, 2(2): 75
|
|
 
|
Lončar, D., Rajić, V., Milošević, S. (2015) Characteristic antimonopoly risks for enterprises operating in Serbia: Identification, appraisal and treatment. Ekonomika preduzeća, vol. 63, br. 7-8, str. 424-434
|
|
1
|
Martin, S. (2006) Industrial organization: A European perspective. Oxford University Press
|
|
|
Obradović, M., Milošević, S. (2017) Competition policy as a driver of economic growth and development in the Republic of Serbia. u: Institutional Changes as Determinants for Economic Growth in the Republic of Serbia, Faculty of Economics, University of Kragujevac, 141-154
|
|
|
Odonoghue, R., Padilla, J. (2013) The law and economics of Article 102 TFEU. Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd, second ed
|
|
|
OECD (1996) Abuse of dominance and monopolisation. Paris
|
|
|
Petit, N., Neyrinck, N. (2010) Behavioral Economics and Abuse of Dominance - A Fresh Look at the Article 102 TFEU Case-Law. u: The Global Competition Law Centre Working Papers Series, 02
|
|
|
|
|