Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:7
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:6

Sadržaj

članak: 2 od 6  
Back povratak na rezultate
2018, vol. 66, br. 1-2, str. 177-188
Pravo i ekonomija zloupotrebe dominantnog položaja
aCommission for Protection of Competition, Belgrade
bUniverzitet u Beogradu, Ekonomski fakultet, Katedra za poslovnu ekonomiju i menadžment, Srbija
Ključne reči: zaštita konkurencije; zlouporeba dominantnog položaja; zabranjene prakse
Sažetak
Fer tržišni uslovi su preduslov postojanja razvijenog i slobodnog tržišta, te je predmet ovog rada zaštita konkurencije, odnosno zloupotreba dominantnog tržišnog položaja iz pravno-ekonomskog ugla. Poseban fokus je na razmatranju ciljeva zabrane zloupotrebe dominantnog položaja od strane preduzeća, definisanju relevnantnog tržišta kao ključnog elementa u procesu utvrđivanja povrede konkurencije i utvrđivanju dominantnog položaja. Posebno su obrazloženi primeri iz poslovne prakse u kojima su analizirane različite prakse zloupotrebe dominantnog položaja: odbijanje i prekid saradnje, predatorsko ponašanje, individualno i asortimansko vezivanje proizvoda, definisanje prekomernih cena, neadekvatna rabatna politika, nametanje ekskluzive i diskriminacija kupaca. Pored toga u radu su predstavljene i mere, koje stoje na raspolaganju Komisiji za zaštitu konkurencije, za otklanjanje povreda konkurencije.
Reference
*** (1890) Sherman Act. ch. 708, 26 Stat. 289. U.S.C
Begović, B., Labus, M., Jovanović, A. (2017) Ekonomija za pravnike. Beograd: Pravni fakultet: Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje, Osmo izdanje
Carlton, D.W., Perloff, J.M. (2005) Modern industrial organization. New York: Addison-Wesley
Commission for Protection of Competition (2010) Eki transfers and tenfore. decision 5/0-02-10/10-1 of 12.01.2010, Retrieved from http://www.kzk.gov.rs/kzk/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/ Resenje-EKI-Transfers-12.01.2010.pdf
Commission for Protection of Competition (2012) Frikom, announcement 2012/12. Retrieved from http://www.kzk.org. rs/kzk/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Saopstenje-Frikom.pdf
Commission for Protection of Competition (2014) JKP Pogrebne usluge, decision5/0-02-27/12-15 of 27.11.2014. Retrieved from http://www.kzk.gov.rs/kzk/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/JKPPogrebne- usluge-Resenje-27.11.2014.pdf
Commission for Protection of Competition (2016) EPS Distribucija, decision5/0-02-563/2016-60 of 23.12.2016. Retrieved from http://www.kzk.gov.rs/kzk/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/ RESENJE-EPS-Distribucija1.pdf
Commission for Protection of Competition (2017) Inter Turs Plus, decision5/0-02-90/2017-131 of 23.10.2017. Retrieved from http://www.kzk.gov.rs/kzk/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ Resenje-InterTursPlus1.pdf
European Commission (1973) Europemballage and continental can company. judgment of 21.02.1973 - Case 6/72. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?u ri=CELEX:61972CJ0006 and from=EN
European Commission (1978) United Brands v Commission. judgment of 14. 2. 1978 - CASE 27/76. Retrieved from http:// eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:61 976CJ0027 and from=EN
Lianos, I., Geradin, D. (2013) Handbook on European Competition Law. Edward Elgar Publishing
Lončar, D., Milošević, S. (2013) Antitrust compliance program as a basic competence of companies. u: Janićijević N., Lovreta S. [ur.] Konkurentnost preduzeća u Srbiji, Belgrade: CID Ekonomskog fakulteta, 261-280
Lončar, D., Milošević, S. (2015) Antitrust policy in Serbia: Regulatory framework and enforcement mechanism. Journal of Contemporary Economic and Business Issues, 2(2): 75
Lončar, D., Rajić, V., Milošević, S. (2015) Characteristic antimonopoly risks for enterprises operating in Serbia: Identification, appraisal and treatment. Ekonomika preduzeća, vol. 63, br. 7-8, str. 424-434
Martin, S. (2006) Industrial organization: A European perspective. Oxford University Press
Obradović, M., Milošević, S. (2017) Competition policy as a driver of economic growth and development in the Republic of Serbia. u: Institutional Changes as Determinants for Economic Growth in the Republic of Serbia, Faculty of Economics, University of Kragujevac, 141-154
Odonoghue, R., Padilla, J. (2013) The law and economics of Article 102 TFEU. Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd, second ed
OECD (1996) Abuse of dominance and monopolisation. Paris
Petit, N., Neyrinck, N. (2010) Behavioral Economics and Abuse of Dominance - A Fresh Look at the Article 102 TFEU Case-Law. u: The Global Competition Law Centre Working Papers Series, 02
 

O članku

jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: izvorni naučni članak
DOI: 10.5937/EKOPRE1802177O
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 03.05.2018.

Povezani članci

Nema povezanih članaka