2010, vol. 7, br. 16, str. 65-74
|
|
Pripovjedačka struktura subjekta i apokalipsa apokalipse ili priča je ovdje izgubila kraj
A narrative structure of the subject and an apocalypse of the apocalypse or the story has lost its end
Sažetak
Osnovna teza ovoga ogleda jeste da se pitanja, prvo: da li se postmoderna desila?, i drugo: ako jeste, u čemu se da prepoznati njeno događanje u srpskoj književnosti?, prevashodno tiču ontološki neporečenog prisustva subjekta i njegova stalnog pripovjedačkog rekonstituisanja u čežnji za novim početkom. Preispitivanje statusa odnosa između postmoderne i moderne se zato, u referenci prema Deredinoj, Fukoovoj, Levinasovoj i Rikerovoj perspektivi, ovdje javlja kao nastojanje da se omogući razumijevanje prirode prelaza i smisla priče o prirodi kraja. Izdvajaju se sljedeće teme: a. Istina, moral i razumijevanje odnosa između ljubavi, bola i smrti. b. humanizam kao sinteza formalne logike i etike, moderna kao moralno-estetička antropologija; c. Linearna struktura vremena, istorija i odsustvo klimaksa; d. Postmoderna i ontološka neutralizacija (drame) subjekta; e. univerzalizacija i neutralnost, ton, govor i stil; f. Apokalipsa i eshatologija, posljednji sud, intoniranje i iznovni problem kraja; g. Metafizička volja za neistinom. ljepota i tajna kao suština istine; h. Subjekt i njegovo pripovjedačko rekonstituisanje. Subjekt i fabuliranje; i. Subjekt, neistina i otvaranje jedne mogućnosti življenja. Apokalipsa apokalipse i priča koja gubi svoj kraj.
Abstract
Postmodern destruction of the narrative structure of grand style and its tendency to overcome an epochal thought escalates in an attempt to annihilate the position of the subject which is established in the constitution of a linear relation between the beginning and the end, birth and death. This paper correspondingly demonstrates that (post)modernity is conditioned by an existentially undeniable presence of the subject and a (dis)continuity of its narrative reconstitution within a desire for a new beginning. An investigation of the status of a relation between post modernity and modernity is conceived here in reference to Derrida's, Foucault's, Levinas' and Riceour's perspectives, and is an attempt to understand the condition of transference and the meaning of the story about the nature of the end. In this attempt the following themes are exposed: a. truth, morality and understanding the relation between love, pain and death; b. humanism as a synthesis of (the)formal logic and ethics, modernity as moral-aesthetical anthropology; c. linear structure of time, history and the absence of climax; d. Post modernity and ontological neutralization of (a drama of) the subject; e. universality, totality and neutrality, tonality, speech and style; f. apocalypse and eschatology, the final judgment, intonation and revival of the problem of the end; g. Metaphysical will for non-truth. Beauty and mystery as the essence of truth; h. The subject and its narrative reconstitution. The subject and plot making; i. The subject, non-truth and the revelation of the possibility of living. an apocalypse of the apocalypse and the story which has lost its end….
|